
.
Field text with textNot whose Poland, but what Poland ...Łukasz Jastrzębski au “Polish Thoughts”.
.
Commentator ‘Swarorzyc’ Lapidarly he referred to Luke Jastrzębski's text:
Rational Endek Reader “Church, nation, state”, is the warp of the endek (and specified was the young Dmowski and Balicki) and a fast descent into the land of political absurdity.
Why isn't there a name here? Jan Stachniuk and names ‘Zasecond’ ?
With many besides Łukasz Jastrzębski it is appropriate to agree, but 1 cannot pass indifferently on the silence of the prominently negative function of the Jewish-Catholic Church throughout the past of the Polish nation and its state.
O Drug We wrote on the WPS page eleven years ago:https://wiernipolsce1.wordpress.com/2015/10/31/o-drawze/, so now a fewer words about the unfortunate flirt of R.Dmowski with the Jewish-Catholic Church.
“Catholicism is not an addition to Polishness, a coloring of it in a certain way, but lies in its essence ...”
These unfortunate words of R. Dmowski from his brochure Nation and State appeared in 1927. – so already after the May overturn of J. Piłsudski in 1926, erstwhile the people-national camp was removed from power. However, J. Piłsudski ran distant from Dmowski and already in May 1926 ordered to study to Pius XI, whom he met in 1919 as a papal visitator of the process Catholicization of Kresów IIRP (asumpt to Volyn massacre It should not be doubted – the Roman Curia is responsible) that:
“Please tell the Pope that until Piłsudski rules Poland nothing will happen in it, which would harm the Church.” - W. Come on. “Cardinal Aleksander Kakowski in the light of his own memories.” "Our Past" 1958 no. 8 p. 263.
After initially negative assessments of Piłsudski's assassination by insignificant church officials in the IIRP, it was yet justified by the Jewish-Catholic Church as “The highest manifestation of Polish patriotism” – the opinion of Pius XI – Pietrzak was decisive. ‘Or a card. August Hlond was a supporter of the Sanitation“ p. 94 footnote 64
A year earlier, in 1926, another prominent "nationalists" (meaning degenerate nationalism – chauvinism), or chauvinists, B. Mussolini and A.Hitler formulated an identical position towards the Roman Curia and judaic religion. All 3 realized that they did not have the right forces (media, education) to fight the Roman Curia and its political influence on the multitude of believers—the Roman Curia as an anti-national, anti-state, anti-social and anti-social institution, which advocated maintaining feudal dependence besides in the strategy of judaic capitalism (Rerum novarum – Leon XIII) and in favour of expanding its political, financial and intellectual mentor position.
The Roman Curia and her pontific Pius XI accepted the advances and expressed their approval and support only for Mussolini and Hitler and for their political movements, as their policies favored the interests of the Roman Curia. Dmowski, on the another hand, was celebrated with a receipt – II of the Republic of Poland in the plans of the Roman Curia was to service again as a Christian foreground for Orthodoxy and for socialism, which R. Dmowski was no longer a supporter (in the 3rd Republic of Poland this policy is continued on the "Trimorza" and with the support of Zionist USA, large Britain, Israel and the Church). And Poland as a state of the Slavs hated by the Vatican – after all, Poland did not give in to Rome until the 16th century – Oh, my God! – from here Leon XIII stated: “Words are the top enemy of the Church” (and let us not forget about the Czech Republic) -, was to be the supplier of cannon meat in the crusade against the USSR (and as from the end of the mediate Ages until the partitions, present Poland is again set by the same forces against Russia – so modern Poles should not be "a fresh Polish decabrist").
A Pole surrounded by judaic religion and unwarranted respect for the criminal organization, which in fact is the Roman Curia, is an excellent material for the taxation flock not only for Rome, but above all for judaic capitalism and Zionist occupiers from the US, large Britain, Israel and a meek subcontractor for NRF companies (whose companies are owned present – ?) – they don't even gotta export Poles to the Reich for robots, he will gladly go for his own money.
The Church in relation to state order was defined as a separate and independent community.Without giving up on the function of a critical conscience, however, he offered his kindness and friendship, expressed his willingness to cooperate and aid in many fields, especially in the field of education in which the patriotic education of young citizens wanted to extend to the supernatural dimension of faith.The Polish primate August Hlond became the typical and spokesperson of this vision, from the beginning of his ministry drawing out the general pastoral strategy of the Church and in a fresh way striving for the unity of bishops. – Fr Piotr Jaroszkiewicz– https://perspectiva.pl/pdf/p33/04-JAROSZKIEWICZ.pdf
On Question “What Poland is to be” I will answer this: surely it cannot be Catholic (Jewish-Catholic) and it is not about the secularity of the state, but about the mentality of its citizens – they cannot succumb to the influence of the Roman Curia, of course political influence, due to the fact that the spiritual morality of the Roman Curia has never guided. But in order for more than 50% of the electorate to deliberately reject the Church as a political institution, paving the way for Zionism and judaic capitalism – i.e. for reckless integration with the story of the West, to which the Roman Curia has deliberately urged Poles, it must be long years, it must be an educational process spread across generations, only who and how is to carry out this process – here is the question.
There are more questions, for example: shouldn't the Roman Curia be cleared at least politically for its crimes?
Dariusz Kosiur










