In 1951, a predecessor of the current European Union, the European Coal and Steel Community, was set up to co-operate countries, fresh opponents fighting in the Second planet War. In 1957, the European economical Community was established, and in November 1993, the European Union, which now brings together 27 countries, was established. Unfortunately, the current actions of the European Union disagree importantly from the thought that accompanied its founders. The thought of peace, economical cooperation has been drastically broken. To disregard the Treaty provisions, their change in the EP, the financial punishment of opponents of these changes, the example of the Polish KPO, interference in areas where competence and decisions belong to individual countries alternatively than to the EU causes an expanding dislike of Eurocrats from Brussels. Cooperation was to be a guarantor of European peace, and the current EU action has led to an aflame of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. Give me 1 argument in favour of continuing this war, not ending it peacefully. In addition, this peaceful organisation, which has a majority in the EP, makes damaging financial decisions and this, not in accordance with the treaty unanimity, but by a simple majority, which will be borne by all taxpayers of individual countries. European taxpayers are expected to aid the corrupt Ukraine at O.25 % of GDP.
The vast majority of EU associate States are members of NATO, a military pact. EU Eurocrats intend to spend billions of euros on the production of all weapons. In favour of this option, there are peculiarly countries that have disregarded the commitments regarding defence spending. The Germans, whose Bundeswehr was weakened by the current head of the KE von der Leyen, who has been the Minister of Defence for six years.
The EU, weakened militarily and economically, strives to connect with America simply due to the fact that it does not like Trump? He resents him due to the fact that Trump makes them pay what they have committed themselves to, that is, the defence of their own countries. Is Poland, which has carried out the surplus of arms, to be indebted to the weak economies of Germany or France, which will collect most of the "EU" money for the production of weapons and come out of the recession? The EU's conflict with president Trump's administration is detrimental to Europe. Those European "leaders" who search it will regret it sooner or later. Their destiny is indifferent to me, but I am not indifferent to the destiny of the people of Europe whose lives may endanger their decisions.
https://www.liil.eu/promujnotke
