Waldemar Żurek - specified a minister was drawn by Donald Tusk. He told the court that due to gnashing under the writing yoke his teeth had broken. late he advised the writer of the Republic not to get tense and drink mint. Well, what I am curious in is whether he presented to the court investigating his case a receipt from the acquisition of mint that might have calmed him down? due to the fact that if not, he's guilty of this omission and his teeth are broken at his own request. There's no harm in wanting him.
This medical advice took place at a press conference involving the limitation of the jury's draw. I think the ministry has the incorrect idea. He should be a wellness minister, or both ministries should be included. He said that the algorithm was incorrect due to the fact that it did not take into account the burden on judges. As usual, IT specialists are guilty. In average civilization, IT would be commissioned to include data on the current load. specified functionality is not a large deal. burden balancing is very well recognized. Production management algorithms specified as canban can be used/modified. There is simply a JIRA strategy and many others. All you gotta do is introduce random assignments to device tools. This is where you gotta change. There's a space that doesn't come to head with the gnashing teeth. Are there truly only people from another era in the courts?
However, I agree with Leszek Kraskowski's thesis that it is not about efficiency, but about the introduction of partiality in the back door. But I will no longer dig with Kon, nor with the remainder of the menagerie. In the present situation, it is not wise, due to the fact that they cannot be harmed (it is not my intention or task) and it can be harmed, due to the fact that the Kobyla, raised in Kórnik, can bend a parol on me (although it is besides unlikely).
Just in case, I think I gotta close this blog due to the fact that there's always any component of aggression in satire that a court can qualify as a crime. You never know which way the law will go with a government like that. Besides, you can't regulation out bribery in court. Especially erstwhile the judges are appointed. Then bribery will have more degrees of freedom. Is it wise to dig horses with a taboo?
