Yeah, I know! We don't know the past of our country, and I want to present any of Iran's past here. But Thierry Meyssan published an highly interesting text on the crux of the current war between Israel and Iran. It besides reveals Anglo-Saxon perfidia. I have already written a fewer times on this blog that, in addition to tribal conflicts somewhere in the jungles of the Amazon or Borneo, there is not a single war in the world, not a single conflict, not a single inflamed place that would be straight or indirectly the consequence of the actions of Britain or the United States. I am horrified by the words of “our” politicians who guarantee that the US is the guarantor of our security! And even greater naivety of a large part, or possibly even the majority, of our society that believes it!!! Just a fewer days ago, an American (!) political scientist, and not just anyone, due to the fact that prof. John Mearsheimer said honestly in a conversation with justice Napolitano:
https://youtu.be/eX2NDHmfJXw?t=351
I think any country on the planet to trust the United States is remarced foolish that includes our close allies "I think all country in the planet that trusts the United States is highly stupid, including our close allies.
But let's decision on to Thierry Meyssan's article.
Start of translation.
Written by Thierry Meyssan
The confrontation between Israel and Iran does not look like the media do. Its roots date back to the times before the muslim Republic, and it has nothing to do with the production of an atomic bomb. It was hailed to cover up Argentinean Rafael Grossi, head of the global Atomic Energy Agency.
Here began the clash between Israel and Persia. Its roots are not in the muslim Republic, but in everything that preceded it. This war will proceed until 1 of the opponents is exhausted.
To realize what is happening and to avoid falling into 1 of the 2 authoritative narratives that mask the reality of the problem, we request to go back a fewer steps.
Enemies of Iran in the 20th Century
All demonstrations in Iran against external enemies end in inevitable "Death of Britain, Death of the United States, Death of Israel!". It's a cry that has come from the depths of Persian suffering since planet War I.
From 1917 to 1919, Iran suffered the top genocide of planet War I [1]. 6 to 8 million people from the population of 18 to 20 million died of starvation, or from a 4th to a 3rd of Iran's population. Iran, though neutral, was crushed by British troops against the rivalry with the Bolsheviks and Osmans. This horror left a traumatic memory that is inactive present in Iran [2]. The Iranians have no uncertainty that Britain is their enemy number one.
The British who colonized Iran utilizing 1 of their officers, Reza Chess (1925-1941), overturned him to give power to his son, Mohammad Rezie Pahlawa (1941-1979). Underneath this coat, they looted Iranian oil. However, in 1951, chess appointed Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh. Mossadegh nationalized oil at the expense of London. There was a quarrel during which the British showed bad intentions and organized a colorful revolution with the aid of the United States. It was Operation Ajax.3]. The fresh government was no longer governed by London, but by Washington. The U.S. Embassy that installed the telephone set up wiretaps on all ministers' lines to eavesdrop on them live, without their knowledge. This strategy was discovered during the 1978 Revolution. The Iranians so have no uncertainty that the United States is their second enemy.
When Mossadegh was overthrown, the British placed General Fazlollah Zahedi in his place. Zahedi was a Nazi who was imprisoned in Cairo, but London hoped to reconstruct “order”. So he created a secret police unit modeled on the Gestapo. He recruited erstwhile Nazis to train them, and respective 100 “revisionist Zionists” were sent by Icchak Shamir (who then worked for Mossad) to supervise them [4]. The Cruelty of Savak, the scariest secret police in the planet at the time, can inactive be seen in her dedicated museum in Tehran [5]. The Iranians have no uncertainty that Israel is their 3rd enemy.
Israel’s Only Enemy in the 20th Century
Contrary to what the people of Israel believe after 25 years of "revisionist Zionist" propaganda, Iran—neither from the time of chess nor from the time of the muslim Republic—was never intended to annihilate the judaic population of occupied Palestine. As president Mahmud Ahmadinejad clearly said, the aim was to destruct the State of Israel in the same way that Russia destroyed the USSR [6].
No, the only enemy of the State of Israel is the 1 who sabotaged all effort to make peace between Jews and Arabs for the last 80 years: Britain. As I frequently explained erstwhile the Ministry of abroad Affairs drew up a plan entitled The Future of Palestine in 1915, it stated that the judaic state should be established in Mandate of Palestine, but under no circumstances should it be able to safe itself. Only 2 years later, David Lloyd George's government drafted the Balfour Declaration announcing the creation of the judaic National House, and Woodrow Wilson's administration pledged to make an independent state for Jews from the Ottoman Empire.
The author of this text, Lord Herbert Samuel, became a British advanced Commissioner in Palestine. On the 1 hand, he favored the “revisionist Zionists” of Żabatoński, and on the other, appointed anti-Semitic Mohammed Amin al-Husseini the large Muftim of Jerusalem. He was then appointed Secretary of State for interior Affairs in the cabinet of Archibald Sinclair.
This policy continues continuously to this day: Britain continues to support, on the 1 hand, the "revisionist Zionist" Benyamin Netanyahu, and on the another hand, the Muslim Brotherhood, whose Palestinian sect is Hamas.
Continuation of the conflict between the "revisionist Zionists" and Iran immediately after planet War II
The United States, Dwight Eisenhower, feared that his Israeli counterpart, Chaim Weizmann, would make “Great Israel”, i.e. it would not recreate the Kingdom of Jerusalem (which was already mostly incorporated into the State of Israel), but the ancient Assyrian Empire (i.e. from Nile to Euphrates). He asked his Secretary of State, John Foster Dulles, to organize an alliance between Syria and Iran to balance Israel's influence.
It was at the request of Washington on 24 May 1953 that Syrian president Adib Chichakli (PSNS) (1953-1954) signed a military cooperation agreement with Iranian monarch Mohammad Reza Pahlavi [7]. Therefore, it is foolish present to condemn the same alliance (now called the opposition Axis) simply due to the fact that both regimes have been decolonized.
But that's what we do. In 1979 president Jimmy Carter overturned Iran's chess and his claim to dominate the mediate East with an atomic bomb provided by French president Valéry Giscard d’Estaing and his Prime Minister Jacques Chirac [8]. To replace him, on the advice of his safety advisor, Zbigniew Brzeziński, he moved Imam Rouhollah Khomeina from France to Tehran. Israel initially supported Iran against Iraq by providing him with as many weapons as needed. Tel Aviv even organized an Iranian part of the Iran-Contra affair. He then gradually changed his strategy [9], retaining any remnants from the chess period. For example, the EAPC-B consortium, half owned by both countries, continues to operate the Ejlat-Aszkelon pipeline, which is crucial for the Israeli economy. In 2018, Kneset passed a bill punishing all publications on the owners of this company punishment 15 years imprisonment [10].
After the Anglo-Saxon invasion of Iraq in 2003, allegedly due to his function in the attacks of 11 September 2001, London and Washington began spreading rumors about alleged Iranian atomic weapons, as did alleged Iraqi weapons of mass demolition [11]. During this time, London and Washington hoped to force Iran to assist them in the fight against Iraq.
This misinformation led to the adoption by the UN safety Council of Resolutions 1737 (23 December 2006) and 1747 (24 March 2007) [12]. Israeli opposition leader Benyamin Netanyahu utilized this propaganda. For twenty-five years, he has constantly condemned the "inevitable" production of Iran's atomic bomb, even erstwhile Tehran filed a motion for a resolution in the United Nations creating a resolution in the mediate East [13] nuclear-free zone.
Anyway, in 2013, William Burns (CIA manager Joe Biden) on behalf of president Barack Obama negotiated in Oman with Iran a Joint Comprehensive Action Plan (JCPOA). This was staged at 5+1 meetings (i.e. 5 atomic powers in the safety Council and Germany) in Geneva. However, the agreement was only signed in Vienna 2 years later and the United States and Iran reserved a long suspension to include a secret additional annex.
In a very long interview [14], just before the end of his second term, Barack Obama explained that he had refused, as a precautionary measure, to halt Iran from starting a atomic bomb race, but that he was willing to intervene if Tehran were to implement a military atomic program. His safety advisor, Susan Rice, said: “The knowing with Iran never aimed primarily at starting a fresh era in relations between the United States and Iran. It was much more pragmatic and minimalist. The goal was simply to make a dangerous country much little dangerous. No 1 expected Iran to become a friendly entity."
United States position [15] has not changed. True, during his first term, president Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew from the JCPOA and the secret annex that negotiated Barack Obama, but orally, alternatively than during negotiations, denied Iran the right to enrich uranium.
During this period Iran began mobilising the Shiite communities of the mediate East to guarantee its own safety. Then, under General Qassem Soleimani, Tehran returned to the chomeinist doctrine of aid alternatively than instrumentalization. By the time Israel destroyed Hamas, Hezbollah and many another organizations, Iran no longer had any "power of attorneys". Each of them became independent.
Events that sparked a confrontation
On June 7, Esmaïl Khatib, Iranian intelligence minister, made public an operation conducted by his secret services. They managed to bargain confidential papers regarding the Israeli atomic program, precisely the same way Mossad managed to bargain Iran's atomic investigation papers in April 2018.16].
On 12 June, the IAEA Board of Governors, chaired by Rafael Grossi, adopted a resolution [17], in which it stated that ‘The Director-General, as stated in paper GOV/2025/25, cannot guarantee that the Iranian atomic programme is purely peaceful’. It so considered that ‘the many negligence of Iran since 2019 in full and timely cooperation with the Agency with respect to undeclared atomic material and activities in many undeclared locations in Iran, as set out in GOV/2025/25, constitutes a breach of its obligations under the safeguards agreement with the Agency within the meaning of Article XII.C of the Statute of the Agency;’. She so referred the substance to the UN safety Council.
However, unless Iranian papers taken over by Mossad, contrary to the statements of Benyamin Netanyahu, revealed any military atomic program [18The first Israeli papers taken over by the Iranian Ministry of Intelligence questioned the neutrality of Argentine Rafael Grossi, manager of the global Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). It follows that he gave Israel the observations made by his organization, even though Israel is not a associate of it. Among the governors of the IAEA, Russia, China and Burkina Faso opposed this resolution.
It turns out that Rafael Grossi had already been accused of unusual silence during a Russian peculiar operation in Ukraine: during a speech at a forum in Davos in 2022, he revealed that the Ukrainian government held 30,000 kilograms of plutonium and 40,000 kilograms of enriched uranium at Zaporozhye Power Plant. Then nothing, despite Russian protests.
The day after the publication of papers seized by Iran, Tel Aviv attacked Iran. This is precisely the same behaviour as during the 2006 war with Lebanon. Israel claimed to have acted after respective of his soldiers were captured by Hezbollah. In fact, he intervened to halt the investigation of Lebanese police and judiciary into an extended network of Israeli espionage and terrorism in Lebanon; an investigation that could lead to a fresh explanation of the execution of erstwhile Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, as shown in my book L’Effroyable imposture 2 [19].
[1] The large Famine & Genocide in Iran, 1917-1919, Mohammad Gholi Majd, University Press of America (2013).
[2] «8-10 million Iranians made over large Famine caused by the British in summertime 1910s, papers reveal», Sadegh Abbasi, Khamenei.Ir, November 4, 2015.
[3] Countercoup, the conflict for the Control of Iran, Kermit Roosevelt, McGraw-Hill (1979). The British function in Iranian home Politics (1951-1953), Mansoureh Ebrahimi, Springer (2016). Mohammad Mosaddeq and the 1953 Coup in Iran, Mark J. Gasiorowski & Malcolm Byrne, Syracuse University Press (2004). The CIA in Iran: The 1953 Coup and the Origins of the US-Iran Trade, Christopher J. Petherick, American Free Press (2006). Iran and the CIA: The Fall of Mosaddeq Revisited, Darioush Bayandor, Palgrave Macmillan (2010).
[4] « SAVAK : A Feared and Pervasive Force », Richard T. Sale, Washington PostMay 9, 1977. SAVAK oder der Folterfreund des Westens. Aus den Akten des iranischen Geheimdienstes, Harald Irnberger (1978).
[5] Fotos von iranischen Führern, die das Museum besuchen, werden von den Volksmudschaheddin vervendet, um den Anschein zu erwecken, dass die rekonstrukierten Folterungen von ihnen gemacht wurden.
[6] ‘Wie Reuters an einer Propagandakampagne gegen den Iran teilgenommen hat“, Übersetzung Horst Frohlich, Voltaire Netzwerk, 14. November 2005.
[7] Syria and the United States, David W. Lesch, Westview (1992).
[8] The Carter Administration and the Fall of Iran’s Pahlavi Dynasty: US-Iran Relations on the Brink of the 1979 RevolutionJavier Gil Guerrero, Palgrave Macmillan
[9] The Secret War With Iran: The 30-Year Clandestine conflict Against the World’s Most Dangerous Terrorist Power, Ronen Bergman, Simon and Schuster (2008).
[10] ‘Israel und Iran beuten gemeinsam die Eilat-Aschkelon Rohrleitung aus“, Übersetzung Horst Frohlich, Voltaire Netzwerk, 3. January 2018.
[11] ‘Wer hat Angst vor der zivilen Atomkraft von Iran?“, von Thierry Meyssan, Übersetzung Horst Frohlich, Voltaire Netzwerk, 5. December 2013.
[12] Checking Iran’s atomic Ambitions, Henry Sokolski & Patrick Clawson, University Press of the Pacific (2004). Iran and the Bomb: The Abdication of global Responsibility, Thérèse Delpech, Columbia University Press (2009). The emergence of atomic Iran: How Tehran Defies the West, Dore Gold, Regnery Publishing (2009). Nuclear Politics in Iran, Judith S. Yaphe, Institute for Narnational strategical Studies, National defence University (2010). Nuclear Iran, David Patrikarakos, Bloomsbury (2012).
[13] « Création d’une region exempte d’armes nucléaires au Moyen-Orient », Réseau Voltaire, 4 Mai 2010.
[14] “The Obama Doctrine” by Jeffrey Goldberg, The Atlantic (USA) , Voltaire Network, March 10, 2016.
[15] Crescent of Crisis: U.S.-European strategy for the Greater mediate East, Ivo H. Daalder & Nicole Gnesotto & Philip H. Gordon, Brookings Institution (2006). The United States and Iran: Sanctions, Wars and the Policy of Dual Content, Sasan Fayazmanesh Routledge (2008). US abroad Policy and Iran: American-Iranian Relations Since the muslim Revolution, Donette Murray, Routledge (2009). Losing an Enemy: Obama, Iran, and the Triumph of Diplomacy, Trita Parsi, Yale University Press (2017). President Obama and Iran: Engagement, Isolation, government Change, Raymond Tanter, Iran Policy Committee (2010).
[16] “Benjamin Netanyahu reveals the “Iranian secret atomic program”“ by Benjamin Netanyahu, Voltaire Network, 30 April 2018.
[17] «Accord de garanties TNP avec la République Islamique d’Iran», Résolution adoptée le 12 juin 2025, à la 1,769 e session, AIEA.
[18] Shock Wave Generator for Iran’s atomic Weapons Program: More than a Feasibility Study, David Albright & Olli Heinonen, Foundation for defence of Democrats, May 7, 2019.
[19] L’Effroyable imposture 2 : Manipulations & Fake News, Thierry Meyssan, Alphae et Demi-Lune (2007).
End of translation.
As for the mediate East, Thierry Meyssan is very well informed. Nevertheless, it seems highly improbable that Israel would wage war with Iran to cover up the machloika of the head of the global Atomic Agency. What is different is the interception of Israeli atomic weapons data by Iranian intelligence. Who cares now erstwhile rockets fall in both countries! That may indeed have been a reason to attack Iran. Everyone is now waiting for Iran to respond after the US attack. Israel demanded the usage of the heaviest American bombs to attack Iran's atomic centers hidden deep in the mountains. But the experts were almost in agreement with the fact that this is impossible due to the fact that they are besides deep. And so far, it looks like they were right. Rather, it seems that there will be an effort to destruct (read: murder) the Iranian government and trigger a civilian war or colored revolution in Iran. Al-Qaeda and the muslim State fighters would be "extracted from naphthalene" and utilized for this operation. Would she have a chance of success? Technically, yes. A large part, if not the majority of Iran's society has had adequate of Ayatollah rule. A friend of Iran's claims, however, that this chance will not be utilized to overthrow them. The information he receives from Iran shows that everyone supports the government due to the fact that it is simply a warrant that the country will not be turned into the second Libya or Syria. The chances of any colorful revolution are so slim.
I am puzzled by the “inaction” of the Iranian anti-aircraft defence during this attack. In addition, the Americans themselves were to inform them that specified an attack would take place! Even for the old Russian S-300s that the Iranians have, the American B2 are an easy target. The Americans and the Jews know that due to the fact that no Israeli aircraft has yet flown into Iranian airspace. All the attacks came from Azerbaijan. In addition, satellite images showed that before the attack many trucks were exporting something from Fordo to be attacked. Who knows if it's all bullshit. The Americans were expected to calmly drop their bombs, which only made quite a few noise, drove off a large success all over the planet and destruction of Iran's atomic programmeTrump could have told the judaic people "I did what you told me to do" and ended the full fuss. I don't know. It's all weird.
Everyone is amazed by Iran's comparatively weak retaliation so far. It's called his weakness. I don't regulation out that this may be the case, but I think it's more like waiting for what the U.S. will do. This besides looks like taking an example from Russia and weakening the opponent by dragging the conflict. Iran has immense rocket supplies and so far it fires the oldest, so that Israel will waste as many anti-aircraft missiles as possible, due to the fact that 1 rocket uses them on average from 3 to 5. And there could be problem with the fresh delivery... But this is mostly motivated by fear of Israel’s erratic steps. Iran is well aware that these criminals and spiritual fanatics are capable of utilizing atomic weapons and the West is inactive accursed!! Iran fears the so-called. Samson Options. It officially foresees the usage of atomic weapons in a situation where the physical existence of the State of Israel would be threatened, so it would be thrown at the opponent. However, I have met many sources, including judaic ones, who claim that all of the healings are the enemy, so that these bombs would be dropped on all the large cities within Israeli scope of their means of delivery.
I just came across article Pepe Escobara About this war. I don't have the best opinion of the author, but 1 message got my attention and I completely agree with it.
Prof. Zhok has succinctly pointed out how no political construction in modern past has accumulated a toxic combination of messianic cultural supremacism; ultimate disregard for human life (everyone else, not “chosen”, is “amalek” anyway); ultimate disability for global law; and unlimited access tolethal firepower.
So what is to be done with specified a pleasant, out of control death cult?
Prof. Zhok He pointed out briefly that no political structure in modern past has accumulated specified a toxic combination of Messianic cultural supremacy, the highest disregard for human life (all others, not "chosen", and so are "amalekites), the highest disregard for global law and unlimited access to deadly firepower.
So what should be done with specified a possessed, out of control death worship?
