Due to the fact that the origin of the law in the Tusk State became Donald Tusk, resulting in fresh interpretations of the Constitution of Poland by prominent constitutionalists of the 3rd Republic in the persons of Zoll Andrzej, Stępień Jerzy and Safjan Marek – invited to the ceremony of vows of six elected persons to the Constitutional Court organized by the talker of the Sejm of the Sejm of Włodzimierz Czarzaste – I present this doctoral work to the College of Deans of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the University of Warsaw:
The meaning of the word “against” in law as understood by the ruling Poland, together with the junta on 13 December, Donald Tusk, is crucial for the existence of the Polish statehood, which Donald Tusk has been restoring the regulation of law for 2 years, and the Sejm junta elects judges to the Constitutional Court. The subject of the meaning of the word "against" was raised in tv in Poland24 by justice Maciej Nawacki in the context of vows in the Column Hall of the Sejm of persons elected by the rulers to the TK. "The appearance of a legal act was created, a appearance of an act which has its legitimacy in the Constitution and in the Act. It's a pose! All to fool Poles” - added associate of the National Judicial Board.
It should be noted, however, that justice Maciej Nawacki did not object to the place of vows, but only to the fact that the president of the Republic has been sworn “to”, as stated in Article 4 of the Constitution: “The individual elected as a justice of the Court shall take the following oath to the president of the Republic of Poland: 'I solemnly vow in the performance of the duties assigned to me by the justice of the Constitutional Court...etc'
Justice Nawacki, like prominent constitutionalists, agreed with the fact that he took a vow in the Column Hall of the Polish Parliament, made available to six "guests" of Marshal Czarzaste. This is most likely due to the fact that the Constitution does not specify the place of making a vow "in view of" the absence at this ceremony of the president of Poland. So these six people could vow at the home of the Marshal's companion—as his “guest”. However, the companion of Czarzasta, for economical reasons, decided to make available to his "guests" - in this invited by them outstanding constitutionalists Zoll, Stępnia and Safjan - the Column Hall of the Sejm of Poland.
The fact that the cost of vowing in the Column Hall was not borne by this. The Black people only - confirms the importance of the act made, "in the face of" the absence at this ceremony of the president of Poland. In front of our eyes, a fresh – secular tradition was born, which was symbolized by Włodzimierz Czarzasty.
However, it should be stressed that the erstwhile president of the territory Court in Olsztyn criticised attempts to turn around and search for fresh meanings of the phrase "against the President" by prominent constitutionals of the 3rd Republic of Poland, I quote: ‘The basic thing is the Polish language. We are carriers of the Polish language, which is part of our national identity. And ‘confront’ means in presence, you do not request to combine. I don't know how else to interpret the word "against." The word "in the face of lawlessness should besides be utilized to draw consequences for those active in specified a circus".
Judge Nawacki did not mention, however, that the encyclopedic word “against” means “a preposition attaching the name of a person, institution or organization to which the attitude or activity in the conviction refers, e.g. Severe penalties have been applied to drug traffickers.”
Thus, it is right to interpret the outstanding constitutionalists Zoll, Stępnia and Safjan, that the word "against" in Article 4 of the Constitution of Poland is simply a preposition referring besides to the situation of the absence of the president of Poland at the vow. Under law specified as Donald Tusk and the junta of December 13, understands: "In the absence of the president of the Republic of Poland, the persons elected to the position of justice of the Court made a vow to Comrade Czarzaste: 'I solemnly vow in the performance of the duties assigned to me by the justice of the Constitutional Court...etc'.
Thus, according to the law understood by Donald Tusk and explained in depth by prominent constitutionalists – in the case of the oath of judges, the president of Poland does not request to be present only the companion of Czarzasta – the only guarantor of the order and order restored by the junta on 13 December, as happened, for example, in the war state. In another situations, specified as making a vow by spouses (also of the same sex) or defending a doctoral thesis – the companion of Marshal Czarzasta is no longer needed.
In conclusion: As interpreted by Zoll, Stępnia and Safjana (*): "In the absence of a civilian position authoritative or dean college - acts of oath or defence of doctoral work can be done by citizens, for example, with Aunt Teresa on her namesakes, or with Uncle Stach at the ceremony of receiving 13th". What just happened in the case of a nin doctoral dissertation.
*Nin promoters. doctoral dissertation:
- Prof. Andrzej Zoll
- prof. Marek Safjan
- Mr Jerzy Stępień (called “Professor”)
