Many countries and political parties in Europe are having difficulty assessing what is happening in the mediate East. 3 attitudes can mostly be distinguished. The first is to support the Palestinians, condemn Israel and abstain from criticism of Hamas.
The second attitude is to support Israel and condemn the crimes of Hamas. Finally, the 3rd attitude is to stay neutral and to request that the earlier peace agreements, including the creation of Palestinian states, be fulfilled.
Of these 3 options, Poland has chosen the 3rd option and this seems optimal for us. Poland retains good relations with the Palestinian Authority, has not interrupted its financial assistance, has not moved the embassy to Jerusalem, while avoiding condemnation of Israel's actions, although it calls for moderation and not attacking civilian targets. erstwhile it comes to the attitudes of political parties, they do not actually talk clearly about this, but we do have sharp divisions among different social groups, celebrities or any journalists. On the 1 hand, the grotesque and uncritical support for Israel is expressed by people like Paweł Kowal is Michał Kamiński. On the another hand, there are left-wing organisations and communities which give full support to the Palestinian side and recognise Israel as a criminal and "fascist" state. The another side seems to have the advantage, at least that's what it looks like on the street. Meetings and news with support for Israel were stout and alternatively few. An interesting situation is in the alleged fresh Left. While Anna Maria Żukowska supported Israel, p. Maciej Necessary He sympathizes with the Palestinians.
What did the right wing or the wider national camp say? In Poland, we are undoubtedly dealing with the alleged legacy of the past, and as we know, the Polish-Jewish relations before 1939 were bad, and this did not concern only the national camp. Bad relations with the judaic community had the folk movement, the chadek movement, then besides the sanitation, and even the PPS. In general, the view that mass emigration of Jews was 1 reasonable solution prevailed. Where? There were various suggestions, but for a minute it was clear that it could only be Palestine. Hence the Zionist movement enjoyed sympathy on the right, and the sanction and partially the national camp supported it actively. The calculation was simple – the judaic national movement will make the Jews make a state to which they will be able to emigrate, become a nation that will know what patriotism is, obligations towards the Homeland, etc. erstwhile you talked to erstwhile ONR activists (e.g. Zygmunt Przetakiewicz or Witold W. Staniszkis), it was their sympathy for Israel and for Zionist activists, before the war, for example, into the movement. Vladimir Żabatoński. Przetakiewicz during the war was friends with Edward Tohari-Warsaw, Zionist activist, with whom he fought in the ranks of the 1st Armoured Division General Stanisław Maczek. On July 24, 1944, they both signed a joint declaration in which they wrote:
"The repopulation of Poland by Jews would not be desirable for Poles or Jews. all formed nation for its life and improvement needs its own state in which it can freely make its national institutions. In Polish lands there must be an independent Polish state, an independent judaic state in Palestine.
It is the moral work of Poles towards Jews with whom they lived for so many generations in their country, to aid them make an independent judaic state. The moral work of Jews is to aid Poles regain the independency of the country in which their fathers and brothers lived and died. These Jews, erstwhile residents and citizens of the country who temporarily want and will be forced to stay in Poland will stay in Poland as citizens of a friendly judaic state, on the rights of friendly foreigners. The period of Polish-Jewish conflict is over. There is now a common conflict before the nations for the same goal: the rule of independent national states in the world. It is in Poland’s interest to have an independent judaic state in Palestine, in the interest of Jews the existence of an independent Polish state.”
When Zionism was condemned in Poland in 1968, people like Przetakiewicz realized that this was not the case. The run under these slogans was seen as an chance to get free of many from Poland presented the most dogmatic part of the apparatus of power, co-in charge of the crimes of 1948-1956. The intent was not to condemn the very existence of the judaic state. That's what these erstwhile ONR activists kept for life. However, for the left, the word "Zionism" has become as pejorative as the word "imperialism" or "fascism". That's inactive the case today.
The left around the planet is usually anti-Israeli. For different reasons. Firstly, Israel is simply a close ally of the United States, so that is enough, secondly, Israel is simply a nationalist state, and this planet left besides does not like, thirdly, it is recognised that Israel is simply a country that is the forerunner of the present West in the mediate East. It is interesting that Israel does not like any Jews either – they are orthodox (or alternatively a part of them), in general rejecting the thought of the state. Israel besides does not like the liberal left, symbolized by e.g. George Soros. His anti-Israeli actions are well known.
Recently, a scandal broke out when, as Israeli newspapers reported, "George Soros was scolded by Israel's ambassador to the UN for giving donations to Hamas support groups". “ According to any information, a full of over $15 million went to terrorist support groups. George Soros' donations to organizations that search to destruct the State of Israel as a judaic state are shameful. Nevertheless, I am not surprised," he said. Gilad Erdan Fox News station. "For years Soros has supported organizations that have tried to isolate Israel". 1 specified organization is BDS (Boycott, Division, and Sanctions campaign). The Parliaments of Germany and Austria classified the BDS as an anti-Semitic movement.
No little confusion was besides caused by statements Elona Muska, who said that the Hungarian-born Soros "reminds me Magneto", a comic villain who performs in the X-Men Marvel series. In his next comment, Musk said: “He wants the erosion of the tissue of civilization itself. Soros hates humanity.” He besides had 1 saying that was unfavorable to the Jews. erstwhile any Israeli politicians (including Israeli MFA) criticized Musk, he took him in defence of the abroad Minister Eli Cohen: "There will be no more specified tweets," said Cohen in an interview with Channel 14, which is simply a uncommon case erstwhile the minister rejects the message of his own ministry.
Amichai Chikli, a associate of the right-wing Likud organization of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and 1 minister of his government, besides stood up for Musk, saying, "As an Israeli minister entrusted with combating anti-Semitism, I would like to explain that the Israeli Government and the vast majority of Israeli citizens see Elon Musk as an amazing entrepreneur and a function model." Criticism of Soros – who finances the most hostile organizations towards the judaic people and the State of Israel – “is not anti-Semitism, on the contrary!” – wrote Chikla.
In turn, the fresh York Post late stated that George Soros, criticized the United States for supporting Israel and not recognizing Hamas after it took control of Gaza. In an article published in 2007 in the Financial Times, Soros criticised Bush's administration's commitment to Israel, calling on the US and the judaic state to cooperate with Hamas. "Israel, with the strong support of the US, refused to recognise the democratically elected Hamas government and halted the payment of millions of taxes collected by Israelis on his behalf," Soros wrote, suggesting that the decision was a mistake that only worsened Israel's relations with the Palestinians.
Against this background, it is better to realize the position of a large proportion of national parties in Western Europe (called "the utmost right" by left-wing media). Leader of the Dutch Freedom organization PVV Geert Wilders He has been a supporter of Israel for years. Not long ago, he called for the Palestinians to be transferred to Jordan, causing outrage in Amman and another capitals. But why? For a simple reason – Jordan has bad experiences with Palestinians. There has already been a bloody war between them and the Kingdom of Jordan (black September 1970). There was no Hamas at the time. Today, any possible of the Palestinians' emigration to Jordan or to Egypt is frightening. respective representatives of countries specified as Saudi Arabia and the United arabian Emirates have late said that the agencies have sympathized with the Israeli operation in Gaza and condemned Hamas. This shows 1 thing, there is something that connects countries like Saudi Arabia and Israel – that thing is nationalism and the desire to preserve the national state. All pan-rabic or pan-Slamic ideologies are for unchangeable kingdoms, emirates or states ruled by the military – an existential threat. To them, Israel is not specified a threat, but an muslim movement.
Let us return to Western Europe. The fact of sympathizing with Israel specified parties as the Wilders Freedom organization or the National Unity Marine Le Pen, finally, the Austrian Free organization – it has 1 another reason behind the thought – there are millions of Muslim communities surviving in these countries, which are a part of their interior judgment. A immense proportion of Jews surviving in France, Austria or Germany shift support from the alleged strategy parties to the “outright right”. This is primarily the case in France. In this situation, it is not a surprise specified as her attitude towards Israel, with Israel ruled by Zionists and to a lesser degree by liberal parties. Another case is Hungary and the organization Viktor Orban Fidesh. Hungary does not have a large Muslim minority, yet Hungary is pro-Israeli. Orban is expected to be about defending the thought of a national state. Hungary has long recognized the Soros Empire and all the ideology it carries. In this war with Soros, Zionist Israel is an ally for Budapest.
Let us besides remember that for national parties in Western Europe, sometimes very different from our right, the precedence is to halt mass immigration and to free ourselves from the bureaucratic grip of Brussels, which has clearly been implementing the George Soros agenda recently. The Israeli issue is secondary to these parties. Therefore, I consider it only motivated by utmost left-wing views to point out to them "prosionism" or to submit to any "Satan plans of Mossad". In the fight against Brussels, the European left shows weakness, so it is better at least not to interfere if it does not want to cooperate with the national right.
Jan Engelgard
photo. Wikipedia
