During my youth, during the reign of Władysław Gomulka (1956–1970), I participated repeatedly in myths and anti-war marches (e.g. the 1962 Cuban crisis, the 1964 American Lao bombings, from 2 March 1965 – the massive American North Vietnam bombings as part of Operation Rolling Thunder, which lasted until October 1968, etc.).
The political sense inspired during Gomulka's regulation of anti-war protests was between others that in this way Gomulka effectively restricted the anticipation of implicating Poland in unwanted war. Any war! It should be recalled that the russian Union deployed atomic rocket launchers with atomic warheads, not by its own will, in our country! Polish politicians are now asking for the deployment of Polish politicians.
Antiwar Gomulka
As part of the policy pursued, inspiring marches and anti-war meetings, Gomulku questioned the credibility of Poland as an ally of the russian Union, in its possible war escapades. By thus neutralising attempts to completely dominate and vassalize Poland, by comrades from beyond the east border. Poland in the block of socialist states behind Gomulku slowly, carefully broke out of Moscow's curate.
During the period of Gomulka's operation in relation to the Hegemon, which was the power in Moscow, were diametrically different than those that we now see in modern Poland, compared to the Hegemon in Washington!
Tow. Wiesława, due to the fact that specified was the nickname Gomulka, I remember with large estimate, due to the fact that he proved his dedication to Poland his full life. All his active, political life devoted to defending our national interests.
Through prison to autonomy for Poland
After accusations by Boleslaw Bieruta in 1948. of "right-nationalistic deviation", on August 2, 1951, he was arrested and subsequently sentenced to prison. After his release from prison in 1954, he began an active conflict to gain power. On October 19, 1956, he became the first secretary of the PZPR. De facto thus assuming power in the PRL.
Gomulka's success – his coming to power – greatly alarmed Nikita Khrushchev (First Secretary of the KC KPZR), who immediately flew to Poland. During respective hours of negotiations, Gomulka managed to convince Khrushchev that he was not trying to break up with the russian Union. He explained to Khrushchev that his goal was more autonomy for Poland. In November 1956, during his stay in Moscow, he negotiated that any action of the USSR troops stationed in Poland would be agreed with the Polish authorities. He besides negotiated a fresh way of accounting in trade with the russian Union. More beneficial for Poland. In addition, it caused Poland's debt to the russian Union to be remitted as of November 1, 1956.
Lukashenko as Gomulka
In private life, Gomulku was a modest man. His economical policy in the Polish People's Republic was akin to the current policy pursued by the president Alexander Lukashenko Belarus.
I remember Gomulka's radio and tv appearances from periods of his rule, in which the main accents were on the improvement of the country. improvement of free education (the celebrated Gomulk password of 1000 schools per 1000 years!) and free wellness care, improvement of housing, agriculture, industry, etc.
Western propaganda centres, specified as the American Free Europe from Munich, whose head of the Polish Section was Jan Nowak Jeziorański, or the Voice of America from Washington and the Polish BBC Section in London accused Gomulka of both anti-Semitism and fighting the Catholic Church in Poland. I've been a passionate listener of these radios.
Anti-Semitic and anti-ecclesiastical?
The allegation of anti-Semitism was due to the fact that during his reign Polish Jews were allegedly forced to emigrate to Israel. In fact, during the period of his rule, Poland left respective dozen, possibly respective tens of thousands of Jews who mostly left for Israel. The exact figures of this Gomulk wave of emigration from Poland to the West I do not remember. For this emigration lasted rather a long time.
Regarding the fight against the Catholic Church in Poland, it is hard to agree. due to the fact that it cannot be regarded as a “fight” with any church of the fact of building a secular state. Like Józef Piłsudski, Władysław Gomulku did not let any church to co-regulate Poland. He did not let them to influence the results of elections, to blend in with politics, to impose a ban on abortion, etc. He objected to their force to run politics, to co-manage... Was that a fight against the Catholic Church?? I uncertainty it.
Letter of Bishops – in whose name?
And they, the hierarchs, powerfully appealed to power, to influence the form of Polish politics. The remarkable proof is that he sent from Rome on 18 November 1965, The message of Polish bishops to their German brothers in Christ's pastoral office, whose meaning was to the celebrated phrase: “...we grant forgiveness and ask for it”.
In whose name did they forgive the Germans? Who asked them to? Who authorized them? Here is simply a political initiative of Polish hierarchs...
The Hierarchs of the Catholic Church are usually carefully educated people, frequently excellent diplomats, excellent oratories, etc. They're very intelligent, predictable! Their bold action proves that they were not afraid of repression by the then government. This contradicts the explanation proclaimed about Gomulku's alleged fight with the Catholic Church.
Who inspires Russian propaganda?
Here you should ask yourself advanced quality questions. Do we now have a class of politics in modern Poland that would courageously build a secular state? Which would argue abroad dominance in Poland? Who would fight for peace for Poland and Poles???? And so on, and so on, you can ask... Will we always have any more?
Currently, I have been carefully and systematically analyzing the latest Russian propaganda for many years. implemented by Russian virtuosos of this art, e.g. Viacheslawa Nikonova, associate of the State Duma of the French Federation (adult of the russian diplomat Viacheslawa Molotov), moving a regular (for 5 days a week) multi-hour “Big Game” program on Russian tv 1. It's a program on political issues. Vladimir Solovev run respective programs of a akin type. Both on Rossija 1 and on radio, broadcast on the channel – Solovev Live. Programme Olga Skabieeva and Evgenija Popowa jointly moving the 60 Minutes programme on Rossija 1. Weekly programme Alexey Puškov. I came to the conclusion that the aggressive, defiant speeches of contemporary Warsaw politicians about Russia and the president Vladimir Putin are propaganda material skillfully utilized not only by the above mentioned propaganda virtuosos. frequently the statements of the Warsaw politicians, and not only these statements, but everything that has to do with Russia and is happening in Poland, is analysed by the Russian Ministry of abroad Intelligence of the Russian Federation, whose manager is Sergei Naryszkin etc.
Poland as a threat
In the current Russian propaganda Poland is presented as a country facing war against Russia and Belarus. I callback this truism due to the fact that the average Russian no longer has any illusions about it. Polish policy for the average Russian appears to be a threat to their state, their statehood. As a serious threat to them LifeOh, my God!
President Putin has absolutely nothing to say to the Russians about the threat of Poland, Polish policy towards Russia and Belarus! Only the statements of the Warsaw top-level politicians will suffice. In the first version.
Polish agents Putin?
In my opinion, these are Putin's best agents, whose statements are passionately publicised by Russian propaganda virtuosos. These statements integrate the Russians into a future, possible conflict for life. A conflict comparable to their 20th century Patriotic War.
It is no surprise to me that in American propaganda we are being presented as a country threatening Europe's security. Threatening the stableness of global governance in Europe. The Americans, who have assigned us a historical function to play, as well as Ukraine, thus already in advance, announce its premiere and dramatic end. akin to Ukraine.
President Putin in December 2021 in his speech clearly announced what he expected from the US and NATO. He besides said that if they did not comply with these Russian demands, they would be forced (read: fought out) by Russia, by all possible means.
Tromtadration Remediation
What do we have? You've done a large occupation of art. Arthur Kalbarczyk, American of Polish origin, in 1 of its newest programs (July 28, 2023): who wins the war – NATO or Russia? For the impatient, I propose you perceive to the indicated program from half to the end. Missing the preliminary part.
In my opinion, as in 1939, contrary to the argument made in the speech Joseph BeckWe'll gotta give everything back. We will not even stay mentioned by this historical minister a virtual button (notabene in a 1939 parliamentary speech, the minister declared that Poland would not give the Germans even a button, let alone a belt). After his speech, European and American politicians no longer had any uncertainty that Poland would fall under the full power of the hordes of Nazi troops...
History Circle
History's a circle. Increasingly bolder, more impudent and provocative speeches by Warsaw politicians bring to head the dramatic past of Poland in the late 1930s.
Currently, in the event of a conflict with Russia and Belarus, we can anticipate NATO to aid us – according to Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, which says, among another things, that NATO countries, according to their capabilities and their choice of form of assistance, can decide, for example, to spread flyers to Poland: “Poles! Hang on! Don't give up! We are with you!’ That's all!
It is highly stupid and naive to think that Americans, Germans or Hungarians will want to die for example for Polish Gdańsk, Warsaw, Poznań, etc.
Prince Charles-Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord, recognized as the creator of modern diplomacy, said “In politics, naivety is worse than crime...”.
Eugeniusz Zinkiewicz
