photo of Facebook / Lech WałęsaLech Wałęsa's case had a crucial turn after the prosecution's decision, but the erstwhile president alternatively of calming down caused a real storm in the net. His immediate consequence to criticism led to a scandal on social media. Emotions on the net have reached a level that has not been seen in a long time.
A high-profile case concerning the authenticity of papers of a secret safety Service associate known as “Bolek” has reached a breakthrough in the territory Attorney's Office in Warsaw. Investigative decision to dismiss the investigation into false evidence by the erstwhile president, who consistently denied authorship and signatures on most of the materials secured in 2016 at the widow of General Czesław Kiszczak. Investigators questioned the earlier opinion of the Institute of Judicial Experts. Jan Sehn in Krakow, and the justification of the decision citing evidence of witnesses about the deficiency of usage of writing by Lech Walesa caused immense controversy in the network.
However, the decision of investigators did not bring the expected calming of the atmosphere around the legend of "Solidarity". The erstwhile head of state began publishing video recordings on social media almost daily, in which he repeatedly returned to the same themes from the past and presented subsequent versions of past events. specified advanced activity brought to the profile a mass of critical statements by net users, to which the erstwhile president decided to respond without any brakes.
Acute dispute under alerts and failure of patience
Instead of ignoring the attack, Lech Wałęsa entered direct verbal pushes with people commenting on his recordings. In consequence to comments about the repeated publication of the same material and suggestions that the lie repeated a 1000 times did not become true, the talker replied in plain words: “The scenes that will come to you.” In another places, he reacted equally briefly to critical opinions, writing to 1 of the participants of the discussion: “The fool is you” and others dissatisfied with the advice of saying, “Don’t listen” or asking, “That’s why you listen.”
The reactions of netizens to the level of discussion presented proved devastating to the image of the erstwhile leader. In consequence to the erstwhile president, there were hundreds of interactions from audiences, among which were dominant icons mocking the full event. The vulgar pushes in the comments section make a long-standing dispute over the historical past fall to the background, giving way to an outrage caused by behaviour in virtual space.
