inactive (6.IX) hung somewhere at the bottom on the Invalids my column of a akin subject devoted, and someway not very hoarded by readers (320 input, 5 comments, 7 x 5). Why, then, do I return to this subject? due to the fact that she's getting worse. Something tells me – possibly old age, surpassing all those other, old and rather present. N. p. can be hard to imagine the sum of life experiences – that there is simply a threat to us Poles to imagine the future of the nation, if the school were to be in specified oppression as it is now subjected to the utmost left, not so much to the social 1 as the ideological one, operating with moral lespherism to the degree so far unprecedented. And at the same time, an amazing education with truncated demands, pushed to the siding, offering what weaker students as their benefit. It's just 1 of the threats hanging over us. Since 1989 – aside from the circular table bubela, Magdalena and honours provided to the barons of PRL – successfully worthy of a better case, he defends at the legislature of Polish Judges on 3 September 2016, as 1 woman put it, "extraordinary caste’ t. j. judges of the PRLu era, so politicized, which at legislature could be seen with the bare eye. It was the first year of the regulation of the United Right. And at the same time opposition to this "casta", as it turns out, effectively to this day torpedoing improvement of the judiciary. This “caste” feels bad without belonging to the ruling party. After all, their ancestors were obligatory companions of the PZPR. Bodnar, Żurek, are those who are entitled to enforce according to what Tusk understands. Can you imagine anything more disgusting? Even the "democracy fighting" does not prevail due to the fact that it only fits into a strategy in which democracy served only the function of chaperone for totalitarian power. Well, let's be frank. State impotence is assured of existence as long as the law is violated, and this in turn perpetuates the disorder and inertia of the justice system. Our western neighbors have already been troubled by Tusk's inability to face president Nawrocki. due to the fact that this announces the strengthening or even restoring the sovereignty of Poland. This, in turn, conflicts with the German federalisation of Europe under German leadership. Obstruction from Poland would surely thwart it. The success in this episode could even awaken France. Smaller countries, let alone. However, for many reasons Germany is not an crucial component of defence against Putin's aggression.
The inability with which Poland has been fighting for 2 years under the authority of the “democracy fighting” under the law of its own thought could not be realised without the support of the liberal-left European Union lineup. The Government of the United Right experienced a severe brake in the form of restrictions in granting funds due to Poland. Mrs. von der Leyen naively, although she sincerely awaited Tusk's victory, due to the fact that only she guaranteed to overpower Poland and its submission to German plans. Tusk's location of capital investments in Poland met these expectations. late the EU-Mercosur agreement leaves no uncertainty that the demolition of specified an crucial area for Poland, which is agriculture, is aimed at the final marginalisation of Poland, besides in the economical sphere. Who's gaining? Sure.
What's written below could put that column on the basket. And it should not be surprising, due to the fact that it will be a kind of heresy. In 2004, erstwhile Poland joined the European Union, it was inactive a union of sovereign states that gave up certain areas of the EU community to the EU power but did not undermine the sovereignty of the associate States, forcing them to cede constitutional powers to the EU leadership. The European Union is based on the principles of the regulation of law. This means that the Treaties, which have been adopted voluntarily and democratically by all associate States, are the basis for all its actions. For example, if a policy area is not mentioned in the Treaty, the Commission cannot propose rules for this area. Coincidence or possibly not, the treaty introducing Poland to the Union was signed by Prime Minister Leszek Miller, abroad Minister Vladimir Cimoszewicz and European Minister Danuta Hübner. Prominent communist activists in power in Poland 14 years after the alleged systemic transformation. The treaty was ratified by then president Aleksander Kwasniewski. So we slaughtered the Union at the hands of people with Peerel prowess – a thing symptomatic of the subsequent fates of the 3rd Republic of Poland.
Most Poles did not hide the satisfaction of Poland's presence in the European Union. Of course, they were unaware of what the Union was going towards, and Schuman's principles had long since landed in the basket. The EU's leadership grew more and more to the left, and ideologically moved distant from Christian values and even from the identity of Europe developed and established since the mediate Ages. Careful observers may have noted the reluctance of EU leaders to values specified as the national state, its traditions, and the social order and its institutions. In a word, the Union sought in a broader dimension than before the 3rd Reich to what Hitler called Gleichschaltung and the russian Urawnilovka. The further past of the Union, in the present time, shows how, in practice, the management of the Union aims to limit the sovereignty of the associate States, pre-empting those who are willing to accept globalisation. The thought of superstates advance liberal-left environments aimed not only at political reconstruction of Europe but besides ideological. These opponents give the anti-establishment, populist, nationalist and Eurorealist powers. The criticism of the desire to make a superstate is increasing, but in fresh years the desire to full integrate and centralise European structures, while reducing the subjectivity and decision-making of individual countries within the Union, has besides increased. These efforts of the wheels to make a superstate under the aegis from Europe, it seems, Germany, have been expanding recently. In November 2023, a further breakthrough took place to limit national sovereignty. During the debate in the European Parliament, it was decided to support a number of changes in the EU treaties. These included limiting the sovereignty and decision-making of EU associate States, including by transferring many of their key competences governing interior affairs straight to the EU headquarters. The interference of EU institutions takes the form of a dictatorship in areas that are an interior substance of Poland. The Court of Justice of the European Union yesterday concluded that "the national court is obliged to declare as an unforeseeable judgement a higher court which is not an independent and impartial court.’ He besides stated that "this should happen erstwhile specified an effect is essential to guarantee the primacy of EU law". The bias of EU authorities in favour of left-liberal forces was evident at the time of the governments in Poland of the United Right and then the Civic Coalition, erstwhile even granting funds due to a non-specified party,. But the Polish state was dependent on Tusk and his crew coming to power.
The abuses committed by the left-wing leadership of the European Union and the application of the regulation of law as it understands it should rise the question whether surviving in a Union that is no longer the Union we have joined makes sense? Shouldn't common sense tell us that persevering in something that could consequence in annihilation of our sovereign state is not simply, simply humanly, judging, senseless?
