Zbigniew Żak, Thoughts 43/2025: What kind of relationships?
date:24 October 2025 Editor: Anna
All the peoples that you created will come, and they will bow down to you, Yahweh, and will praise your name. For you are large and execute miracles: only You are God. Teach me, O Lord, thy way, that I may follow thy truth; call my heart to fear thy name. I will praise you, Lord, my God, with all my heart, and forever praise your name (Ps 86:9-12).
Do not associate with unbelievers in 1 yoke. What does justice gotta do with injustice? Or what does light gotta do with darkness? Or what is Christ's fellowship with Beliah or the believer with the infidel? What yet connects God’s temple to idols? For we are the temple of the surviving God, according to what God says, I will dwell with them and walk among them, and I will be their God, and they will be my people (2 Cor 6 14-16).
Representatives of post-communists (called left) managed to get PSL politicians to support the draft law on partnerships. The name is camouflaged as it sounds neutral: ‘Law on the position of the closest individual in a relationship’. The alleged left with "care" leans over property relations, the right to housing and alimony, and access to medical information for persons of the same sex surviving together. The intention is definitely different: based on this bill, we want to decision in, as K. Kotula spoke, the partnerships and then adopt children for monosexual couples.
One of the most crucial elements of the fight against Christianity, as presented by the alleged Frankfurt School, is universal sexualisation, the demolition of conventional household ties, the reversal of basic concepts specified as marriage, sex, man, woman, parents, children. Left-liberal parties prosecute this goal continuously, sometimes straight and sometimes in tiny steps pretending that it is something else. And if they can accomplish that, then they grow the scope of this destructive action.
Work on partnerships has been going on for years, and has been conducted by the current government, but during the presidential run has been halted. Work on this task has now resumed and will be presented as a government project.
It is crucial to know that the full concept of "institutionalisation" of partnerships is unnecessary, especially from a legal point of view – due to the fact that the solutions proposed in them are already in force. In the current legal system, there are provisions of civil, household and administrative law that let personal, property and inheritance relations to be shaped in practice.
There is, and this should not be, the anticipation of joint taxation settlement, taxation relief and taxation exemptions for inheritance, entitlement to household pensions or benefits after the deceased partner. taxation relief and fiscal advantages be to advance situations that are applicable to the welfare of the community – specified as marriage. There is no reason to grant the same privileges to 2 persons of the same sex.
According to M. Romanowski (Government Against Common Goods), https://wp.naszdnik.pl/2025-10-22/396452, government-against-good-wspolnem.html): "Marriage as a legal institution finds its justification not only in constitutional order, but further: legal, but besides anthropological and functional. Its essence is the common gift of 2 people and the focus on the procreation and upbringing of children... In another words, matrimony love, which directs a individual to search the welfare of another individual as a individual of different sex, implies the acceptance of the possible motherhood or fatherhood that that individual sacrifices. specified (of course irrevocab and permanent) relation between a female and a man is complementary – biological, emotional, but above all spiritual at the level of a individual relation – which in effect enables harmonious improvement of the kid and the stableness of the community. The same-sex union is deprived of this fundamental dimension – not only biological, but besides individual – which constitutions matrimony as a community of life, love and work directed in its essence besides towards procreation full understood. In particular, the issue of adoption of children by single-sex couples is in flagrant conflict with natural law and Christian morality. The right to parenting is not an absolute right, but a natural relation between a female and a man. And he's highly correlated with his work to the child. The welfare of the kid – not the desire of adults – must be an overriding criterion, and its essential component is the right to be raised by a father being a man and a parent being a woman."
And it is worth quoting the words of Mr. Rafał Dorosiński, who wrote the article: “The apparent equality, the real destruction. On the consequences of institutionalization of informal unions" (https://ordoiuris.pl/civilisation/appropriation-reality-destruction-about-consequences-institutionalisation-union-informal/): "We stand at the threshold of a revolutionary decision to make a breach in the cultural, constitutional and natural institution of marriage. Lobby, which, in turn for revolution, does not hide its eventual aims, which is to deprive a female and a man of any speciality. All functions performed in our cultural ellipse by spouses, including raising children, creating a haven of safety and a first school of responsibility, are to be widely opened to informal unions, without factors supporting stableness and security, without natural female and male patterns. Under the dictatorship of this revolution, all social institutions must change. From schools, through religion and culture, to civil, criminal and even commercial law. It is at this phase that the destructive wave that strikes the household and constitutional and social order of the Republic must be stopped." It is worth listening to the conversation with R. Dorosinski: https://www.youtube.com/embed/WQAPyZDk-jA
What can be done in this situation? An example of the alleged "Health Education" showed that if a preemptive fight is taken against the incorrect solution, it can be won.
By the way, the MEN medal for implementing this subject was awarded to Antonina Kopyt, a sex educator, who was the first to propose to introduce "sexual education" under the name "health education" to Polish schools. The copy besides publically demanded that it be a compulsory object for all students. This reveals the actual intentions of the Minister of Education.
So, before decisions are made, you gotta protest, for example, at: https://stopzkomparterski.pl/. We hope that president Karol Nawrocki will veto specified a bill. However, it is good for the president to have Polish public opinion on this matter. Let us besides address the Members we know who are in the governing coalition to encourage them to reject this project. It is worth pointing out that 1 day they will face the Court of God and gotta consider that they have acted against God’s order. possibly those who inactive have religion will realize the evil behind this project. And pray for the defence of natural order in Poland!
Zb.
One of the most crucial elements of the fight against Christianity, as presented by the alleged Frankfurt School, is universal sexualisation, the demolition of conventional household ties, the reversal of basic concepts specified as marriage, sex, man, woman, parents, children. Left-liberal parties prosecute this goal continuously, sometimes straight and sometimes in tiny steps pretending that it is something else. And if they can accomplish that, then they grow the scope of this destructive action.
Work on partnerships has been going on for years, and has been conducted by the current government, but during the presidential run has been halted. Work on this task has now resumed and will be presented as a government project.
It is crucial to know that the full concept of "institutionalisation" of partnerships is unnecessary, especially from a legal point of view – due to the fact that the solutions proposed in them are already in force. In the current legal system, there are provisions of civil, household and administrative law that let personal, property and inheritance relations to be shaped in practice.
There is, and this should not be, the anticipation of joint taxation settlement, taxation relief and taxation exemptions for inheritance, entitlement to household pensions or benefits after the deceased partner. taxation relief and fiscal advantages be to advance situations that are applicable to the welfare of the community – specified as marriage. There is no reason to grant the same privileges to 2 persons of the same sex.
According to M. Romanowski (Government Against Common Goods), https://wp.naszdnik.pl/2025-10-22/396452, government-against-good-wspolnem.html): "Marriage as a legal institution finds its justification not only in constitutional order, but further: legal, but besides anthropological and functional. Its essence is the common gift of 2 people and the focus on the procreation and upbringing of children... In another words, matrimony love, which directs a individual to search the welfare of another individual as a individual of different sex, implies the acceptance of the possible motherhood or fatherhood that that individual sacrifices. specified (of course irrevocab and permanent) relation between a female and a man is complementary – biological, emotional, but above all spiritual at the level of a individual relation – which in effect enables harmonious improvement of the kid and the stableness of the community. The same-sex union is deprived of this fundamental dimension – not only biological, but besides individual – which constitutions matrimony as a community of life, love and work directed in its essence besides towards procreation full understood. In particular, the issue of adoption of children by single-sex couples is in flagrant conflict with natural law and Christian morality. The right to parenting is not an absolute right, but a natural relation between a female and a man. And he's highly correlated with his work to the child. The welfare of the kid – not the desire of adults – must be an overriding criterion, and its essential component is the right to be raised by a father being a man and a parent being a woman."
And it is worth quoting the words of Mr. Rafał Dorosiński, who wrote the article: “The apparent equality, the real destruction. On the consequences of institutionalization of informal unions" (https://ordoiuris.pl/civilisation/appropriation-reality-destruction-about-consequences-institutionalisation-union-informal/): "We stand at the threshold of a revolutionary decision to make a breach in the cultural, constitutional and natural institution of marriage. Lobby, which, in turn for revolution, does not hide its eventual aims, which is to deprive a female and a man of any speciality. All functions performed in our cultural ellipse by spouses, including raising children, creating a haven of safety and a first school of responsibility, are to be widely opened to informal unions, without factors supporting stableness and security, without natural female and male patterns. Under the dictatorship of this revolution, all social institutions must change. From schools, through religion and culture, to civil, criminal and even commercial law. It is at this phase that the destructive wave that strikes the household and constitutional and social order of the Republic must be stopped." It is worth listening to the conversation with R. Dorosinski: https://www.youtube.com/embed/WQAPyZDk-jA
What can be done in this situation? An example of the alleged "Health Education" showed that if a preemptive fight is taken against the incorrect solution, it can be won.
By the way, the MEN medal for implementing this subject was awarded to Antonina Kopyt, a sex educator, who was the first to propose to introduce "sexual education" under the name "health education" to Polish schools. The copy besides publically demanded that it be a compulsory object for all students. This reveals the actual intentions of the Minister of Education.
So, before decisions are made, you gotta protest, for example, at: https://stopzkomparterski.pl/. We hope that president Karol Nawrocki will veto specified a bill. However, it is good for the president to have Polish public opinion on this matter. Let us besides address the Members we know who are in the governing coalition to encourage them to reject this project. It is worth pointing out that 1 day they will face the Court of God and gotta consider that they have acted against God’s order. possibly those who inactive have religion will realize the evil behind this project. And pray for the defence of natural order in Poland!
Zb.
