On 9 December this year, on the YouTube channel Kol. Kamil Klimczak "Chrobry Trail" a conversation with me appeared. Anti-communism without a commune by “nationals” (link – https://youtu.be/LNldLQtoeCk?si=34VRF7NILGLLu4No) In this conversation, I gave harsh criticism to modern organizations utilizing old or fresh national signs, and in fact they are caricatures of these signs or their complete denial. The comments featured an interesting entry of the viewer (nick suggests that it is you), however, due to the crucial questions he asks, I place it below anonymously.
"I do not full agree with the line of reasoning presented in the above video, due to the fact that communism regardless of whether patriotic or internationalistic is at the very foundation of natural law, which assumes the existence of something specified as private property. Moreover, materialism and atheism are at its philosophical base.
The Church has repeatedly condemned this ideology, among others, Pope Pius XI in the encyclical Divini Redemptoris in 1939 or Holy Oficium in many of its decrees prohibiting Catholics from acting in specified organizations. Pope Leon XIII besides devoted this separate encyclical “about the sect of socialists, communists, nihilists”. The index of prohibited books included publications to reconcile the thought of Catholicism mentioned above.
If we are in favour of rebuilding a Catholic state and I presume that the author of the channel is besides opting for this solution, then we cannot tolerate specified disgusting attacks in public space. A mistake should not have the right to a public existence, as St. Thomas of Aquinas wrote. so organizations specified as the Communist organization of Poland or the Red Front should be banned. Even if we are not motivated by philosophical reasons, it is adequate to follow Article 13 of the Polish Constitution, which expressly prohibits the existence of specified groups.
As far as these celebrations are concerned, I think this is the way to choose the Black 1 as the talker of the Sejm.
And here I agree that the main problem that this individual is emanating is not historical events and membership of the PZPR but a liberal-left worldview combined with internationalist heritage.
I would besides not justice the current All-Polish Youth so low because, as far as I agree, there is simply a very strong russophobia there, however, I would not accuse them of supporting capitalism like the fascination of Marshal Piłsudski. In the ideological declaration they have written that they support national solidarity, and among the members of this organization are supporters, e.g. corporateism.
Could you make this comment if, of course, you read the comment from where this organization is so overly negative that the guest invited by you uses the word "neo Youth of All Poland"?
I answered these questions and doubts as follows:
"Dear Lady, I do not know if you want an answer from me, but I will answer you.
We are not surviving in a zero-one planet and, of course, theoretical reflections on the condemnation of communism have their meaning, but life remains life. Especially the life of a nation, which in all situation and strategy should be protected (not e.g. destruct by uprisings). And it is absolutely never essential to follow the slogan “the worse the better”, i.e. make the lives of the nation worse, exposure it to disasters, losses, etc. in the name of the alleged benefit in the future. The madman, who was 1 of the main ideologists of the January Uprising, Stefan Bobrowski, knew perfectly well that it could not be won. But that's not what he meant. He meant that Poles under the Russian business should endure specified a defeat and become victims of specified repression, so as not to think about the anticipation of reaching a deal with Russia in the future. That was the intent of this madman, mostly accomplished. Fortunately, in the unfortunate state, the nation recovered from this and replaced negativity with the positivism from which the Endite movement grew.
As for the papers of the Church. delight note that despite the existence of many different condemnations of heretics, masonry, communism, Vatican, as a temporal associate in the global game, he maintained and maintains contacts with countries where, especially today, the blooms of the Masonic and anti-Christian ideology have led to the fact that in the West present abortion has become a human (female) right, matrimony has been caricatured, and national identity and national culture have been degraded to advance abroad multi-culturestudents. And the Church does not break up with these countries (because it would gotta break up with most Christian countries, for example), but for the sake of the faithful it keeps them. The same was actual of the alleged communist countries, with which contacts, if only those countries wanted to, were maintained, and even as they were not, the Vatican sought to care for the destiny of Catholics in these countries. People's Poland is an example of a country that has intensified contacts with the Vatican especially since the 1970s.
We can, of course, dispute the construction of a Catholic state (do you realize how many concepts there will be, including mutually exclusive ones?), but the task of a political organization is to tread hard on the ground and live under conditions that be here and now. This was the case in the People's Poland, in which, of course, we had stages of aggression of power towards the Church, but in most of this period, the Church actually developed well against any of the dislikes and problems thrown under his feet. And even during a period of aggression of power he did not call for opposition understood as an open conflict with the state and never denied this country, or People's Poland (I mention to the writings of Cardinal Wyszyński on this matter). Today, the universal Church itself does not talk of building a Catholic state. There have been changes in the planet that have caused specified ideas here and now (this does not mean that besides in the future), are a form of utopia. And a sound, rational national movement cannot be influenced by illusion and the pursuit of utopia.
The delegation of a group completely irrelevant from all point of view [KPP], of course, is just a PR play. At the same time the anti-Polish Ukrainian Union in Poland and full herds of lobbyists working for abroad reasons, both national and international. So he attacks himself with a mosquito cannon to cover his weakness and helplessness.
Wizards, etc., they're not communists. They were not in People's Poland either. They then joined the ZSP or the PZPR, due to the fact that the opportunistic sense and the desire to make a career caused them. That is why any of the alleged post-communists (who are already fewer due to age) after 1989, and especially recently, have performed a akin operation – they did a "copy/paste" of the ideologies and views of the neo-left and considered them their almost overnight. Do these views have anything to do with erstwhile communism, delight justice for yourself.
Speaking of capitalism. I could compose a lot, but there would be no area for YT. 1 quote from Jędrzej Giertych from August 1966 (‘Horizones’): "And after all, capitalism is criticized by immense fractions of Western thought, and in interwar Poland it was fought by national circles on an equal footing with Marxism".
Piłsudski's fascination is absolutely incompatible with the Endecimal thought. There were people before the war, who shared e.g. an endekt position towards Jews, while secretly or not, manifested Piłsudski's fascination and the authoritarian strategy he created, but any of them were not simply nationalists. They were a mirror reflection of the right sanitation, in fact being an enemy of not Piłsudski and the strategy (the enemy of which is the Endeck thought), but only of left, liberal, and Masonic tendencies within it. They were besides partially fascinated by Mussolini and Nazism.
Neo-MW due to the fact that the current slogans that this incarnation of the organization (and the slogans are an expression of ideology) are in gross contradiction with the tradition of the Endecian thought. I cited Dmowski's statements, which were in fact his will for the movement as regards relations with Russia. Today's neo-MW follows a global policy that seeks to guarantee the U.S. hegemony and the demolition of Russia and its acquisition by this global current. Dmowski besides warned against utilizing Poland and Poles to feel bad about Russia and fighting it. He was an enemy of Ukraine (which was not yet there, but opposed the thought of building specified a one) as being a front for the war with Russia and the glee of Russia. He considered the manipulation of the attitude of Poles to Russia to be humiliating to us and servants to strangers. Today, neo-MW puts obsessional hatred of Russia (yes, obsessive, due to the fact that the word "ruskie scum" proves obsession), a community with any non-existent West and de facto supporting hateful Poland Ukraine, goes against the most crucial foundations of national thought. And let me add, to be clear – our attitude towards Russia, Ukraine, the West, the fight that is taking place in the world, is not due to copying literal indications from before the century, but precisely to observing changing reality.
I would add that Roman Gierty in the first years of the existence of the reborn MW (the beginning of the 1990s), preached a highly advanced pro-Russian program. I urge the book Contrrevolution of Youth. He besides made a full ideological volt respective years ago, as did MW.
My sharp wording towards neo-MW is besides due to my individual attitude towards the MW, to which I belonged a long time ago. It is hard for me to accept that this organization, under the old name, introduced completely new/old (because in fact incorporated from the Polish romanticist camp, the right independence, etc.) content, abroad thoughts of Dmowski direction.
Adam Laughter
The background under the title of the entry is simply a collage of photos from FB Youth of the All-Polish – Silesian District.
