If individual reads it, they'll catch their head and say, "I knew it was bad, but I didn't. Here is the “work” of a certain Przemysław Witkowski, a doctor from Collegium Civitas. which was praised in the introduction by Jacek Żakowski, erstwhile a average Catholic from the ellipse of the "Wizowski Tygodnik" to the heavens, is now a mad genderist to the limits of humor.
He writes: "Omysław Witkowski wrote a essential and fascinating book". Another thing is that he did not compose it, he edited it, due to the fact that it is simply a collection of interviews with sixteen scientists, journalists, mainly from the ellipse of the alleged fresh left – about how fresh fascism is coming.
What is fascism? Everything to the left, fascists are even communists who protected the household and morality. Although any of the interviewors (mostly historians) believe that fascism is already a past and a history, another interlocutors, ideologists, feminists, genderists, etc. decision on to the agenda. It may not be in the same edition as it utilized to be, but it will be its fresh variation, no little dangerous. Everyone is at hazard but for white heterosexual men, due to the fact that they are the reason for Fascism. There is no threat from Islam, the story of rapes against white women in Europe is propaganda of white men wanting to hold a monopoly on these rapes and enslavement (!).
Islamophobia serves to keep the supremacy of fascists – specified a thesis can be found in the statements of people with technological titles. And that's the most terrifying in this book, these bullshit and mad theories talk with complete conviction about their wisdom people with technological titles representing frequently renovated universities, Polish and foreign! Here are 2 examples:
Example one, Dr hab. (sic!) Ewa Majewska“I late had specified a fascist minute in me. He was beautiful funny. That day I worked a twelve hours in a row, doing a full lot of things. I wrote, I prepared a speech, I had a seminar. And in the evening, I heard from the individual I was having an affair with, and there was a very clear want for us to talk on video. And I was tired of it online. But of course I figured I wouldn't be rude and let's do this video. It was so paralyzing and stressful for me. We agreed it wasn't a good thought and we ended the conversation. And for 2 hours after that event, I started to talk about why I wasn't up for the occupation and I wasn't the perfect mistress. Then I woke up the next morning reasoning I didn't have to. It is my sense of commitment that I gotta execute a million roles and I gotta do politely and obediently what everyone wants from me, that is simply a classically fascist communicative about a woman. I've been a feminist for 20 years, even longer, a individual who tries to fight fascism, but besides analytically look at it. And suddenly, in me and my own behavior, despite all the criticism, there is simply a willingness to comply with the norms of femininity, without reviewing the conditions under which it happens. It wasn't like individual made me do it. This is the inertized fascism in me.”
And the second example of the scientist, previously, as we know, was a "teacher": Dr hab. (sew!) Jacek Kochanowski: "Political homophobia is simply a tool for defending a "insecure nation" in the context of modern change in the political and cultural sphere. Poles in times of precarization of work, turbocapitalism and the breakdown of public education, the bankruptcy of wellness services and a corrupt state, have 1 "stop" – a family. Father, parent will help, borrow, brother will give a ride, brother-in-law will fix, grandson will clean up, etc. This fantasy is their refuge in the chaos of this world. The fantasy of a household as having safe asylum in a terrible planet becomes a central fantasy, resulting in even the name of the erstwhile far right organization – the League of Polish Families. And these right-wingers inform against moral collapse, nihilism, promiscuity, or breaking the integrity of the household and its conventional model. Gays and lesbians became a symbol of emancipation, moral changes and changes in the strategy of values. In addition, as Jews were associated with wealth and greed, gays and lesbians present are associated with the “supposed West” and their sexual orientation is treated as a fantasy of intelligence or a mediate class of the “simple people” threatening “pure morality”.
The terminology complexities, which are de facto pseudoscientific babbling, are intended to cover the primitiveism and foolishness of these “theory”. How was it possible for specified nonsense to get the qualities of discipline and for people representing it to take exposed positions in the academic world? It is known that this came from the West, where these insane circles have powerful financial and media support, and now besides state support. possibly any of these “scientists” and “teachers” do so for money and opportunisticism, but comfort is small. These people do not realize that the intellectual extremism they present, which does not tolerate criticism and reject a different view of the planet – this is simply a real threat of “fascism” or even totalitarianism. The origins of this totalitarianism are visible in the West in part besides in our country.
Finally, a bit humorous, though possibly not for everyone. This is simply a disgraced tip on a judge. Simon MartiniakAnd not just that, Dr Rafał Pankowski from the “Never More” Association discusses whether the “repentance” of erstwhile “fascists” or Michał Kamiński and Romana Giertych, it is sincere (it reminds me of the Inquisition itself, or alternatively the way the lefties represent it, not knowing that they are now the Inquisition, dealing with the "return" and the deficiency of trust whether this "repentance" is sincere, so it is better to burn the guest at the stake with caution). So let's read how these fascists are:
"When it comes to the current popularity of Gierty in the liberal spectrum, it surprises me that Donald Tusk has been legitimizing him for years. However, I will stress very powerfully that I would not take anyone's right to evolution or to ideological change. Only that I have doubts about how real this transformation is in the case of Roman Giertych. I read Giertych's book rather carefully, published erstwhile this evolution was about to take place, and he says in this book that he did not change any views. I besides read a book and many different statements by Michał Kamiński, who started at the NOP and went to Pinochet from scaplerrn with parent of God. And I'll admit that his shift is different. He says straight: yes, I was young, stupid, incorrect about Silky. I accept that and believe that in this case this evolution is, however, more authentic. I say this as a individual who has bad blood for Kamiński, especially in the British media, erstwhile he became head of the Group of European Conservatives and Reformists in the European Parliament. I was frequently quoted with opinions about him at the time, very negative. At the time, I was far from any sympathy for him. However, it seems to me that his various gestures and statements show that this transformation is more authentic in his case."
So Kamiński will be “saved”, Gierty, just in case for the stake.
Jan Engelgard
"Fascism That Coming. Talks by Przemysław Witkowski", Book and Press, Warsaw 2023, p. 341.
Think Poland, No. 35-36 (27.08-3.09.2023)
