"Interest well understood" – Tocqueville's old word – meant that it was sometimes worth reducing its own selfishness to gain along with others in the long term. present this thought comes back, but in a completely fresh context: a planet of algorithms, memes and populist emotions.
The state, if it wants to be effective, can no longer act as an omniscient guardian. He must become a community accelerator
– to strengthen bottom-up activities, to make it easier for citizens to decision from observer to associate and moderator, and to reward the regular effort that truly sustains community life.
The old idea
"Interest well understood" appeared in Alexis de Tocqueville's reflection as he watched young American democracy in the 19th century. The French aristocrat was amazed that in a society without conventional hierarchy people could make associations, cooperatives and neighbouring communities. In this he saw not only a demonstration of applicable sense, but besides a school of democracy.
Tocqueville’s well - understood business meant more than a simple calculation of benefits. It's the ability to reduce your own egoism to work together, which in the long word has benefited everyone. The bridge, library or school were created due to the fact that individuals could think not only in terms of ‘me’ but besides ‘we’.
This logic of cooperation was the foundation of American democracy. It has shaped a civic attitude that is resistant to 2 temptations: the egoism of the individual who breaks the community, and the sovereignty of the state which strangles the bottom-up initiative. Business was well understood as a means between these extremes – he taught that freedom and work do not should be exclusive, but reenforce each other.
New Times: infosphere and populism
Modern democracy is becoming little and little like a peaceful deliberalisation and a more and more attention market. It's not who's right, it's who can attract emotion. 1 viral can cancel months of parliamentary debates.
In this environment, populists are doing peculiarly well. Their strength is not solving problems, but the ability to give them dramatic binding and formulating simple passwords.
The deficiency of real origin at local level makes citizens more willing to engage in national, civilian or identity narratives.
Around everyday matters – transport, education, spatial planning – it is hard to build emotions, but easy around “the defence of borders”, “the endangered identity” or “the betrayals of elites”.
In the meantime, the state, alternatively of restoring citizens' sense of cause, frequently acts as a battery of expectations. alternatively of refusing, it fuels the illusion that it can solve any problem: from fuel prices to global crises. specified a political logic of "never refusing" strengthens populism – due to the fact that since the state declares omnipotence, all failure of it becomes evidence of betrayal, incompetence or sick will.
Work!
As a result, a vicious ellipse is formed: citizens, incapable to act locally, invest emotions in national narratives; a country that cannot refuse to fuel these expectations; populism captures attention and the local community remains in the shadows.
And the energy of the citizens is not gone. Today, what could build local ties is analysed in symbolic conflicts. The task for the future is to shift the tracks: redirecting this energy to activities that not only attract attention, but besides solve real problems and build confidence.
Week of civilian Affairs
Since 2020, we have been discovering uncomfortable truths and announcing stories that have the power to change Poland.
Donate and become our contributor
Citizens' Way: From Observer to Moderator
A modern citizen lives in 2 worlds at once: digital and local. In 1 he reacts with a sleigh, comments, gives another; in the another he sees a gap in the pavement, a neglected playground, or a neighbour who nobody helps with shopping. The problem is that it ends very often. In the network he becomes a commentator, in local life – an observer.
And yet this is where the space begins, in which a business well understood can regain its meaning. Just go a step further: alternatively of just criticizing on the Internet, effort to gather others around the case. alternatively of just complaining about the deficiency of benches, effort to convince neighbors and local entrepreneurs to work together. This is simply a minute erstwhile the citizen becomes not only a associate in the discussion, but a moderator – individual who is not waiting for the ready, but is animating the community.
This road looks different. For some, it starts with an online petition that turns into a gathering of residents. For others – from moving a neighbourhood group on Facebook, which over time becomes a real forum for exchanging services and ideas. Others start with simple aid – they store for older neighbors or walk dogs to those who can't – and in time drag others into it.
It's not a large gesture. These are regular practices that require courage to take a step beyond the function of commentator. But that's the strength of the community.
In a planet where attention is easy turned into anger and polarity, each specified step is simply a form of civic prevention – an exercise of how to turn a dispute into conversation and complaining into action.
Welcome to internships, internships and volunteering!
Join us!Community Gamification – feedback
Gamification is the transfer of mechanisms known from games – points, badges, rankings – to everyday life. This has been working flawlessly for years: for all comment or reaction we get an immediate consequence in the form of a sleigh or a notification. It is this mechanic that makes us so easy active in endless scrolling.
So why not usage it where the common good truly is?
The first step is to give position and visibility to people who do things for others.
Moderator of a neighbourhood group that can keep the discussion quiet. A volunteer who regularly helps older residents. A fireman or a teacher whose regular work remains invisible. They should become local mention points – not only by professional obligation, but by the designation that the community gives them.
This is where the function of the community itself begins: to see and reward specified actions. Sometimes a discrimination is adequate at the gathering of the housing council, another time a thank you on social media or a symbolic badge granted by residents. Visibility becomes a reward in itself – and erstwhile the position appears, there is besides motivation for others to follow in their footsteps.
This gives emergence to a affirmative feedback. The more actions are rewarded, the more it pays to engage in them. The visibility mechanics creates a full ladder of position awards – from simple thanks to real authority in the eyes of the community. And the more people enter this path, the stronger the sense of community becomes. It is simply a mechanics that strengthens itself – provided individual initiates the first move.
Local authorities and municipal services are needed in this process. Their function should not be to presume work for all initiative, but to communicate honestly and honestly with residents. If a study of a broken street or a deficiency of lighting ends with the silence of the office, the motivation goes out. If there is simply a clear message instead: “Thank you for the signal, repair in progress, delight be patient”, citizens feel that their voice counts. This is not the failure of authority by the administration – it is an investment in trust.
The Community, which can appreciate its own activists, and the administration, which can communicate its actions and limitations honestly, together make an environment in which a well-understanding interest begins to operate in practice.
It is here that modern power of democracy is born: not in large slogans, but in the regular mechanics of recognition, position and answers.
Accelerator state, not monopolist
The trap of modern democracy is that both sides – state and citizens – have learned to exchange illusions comfortably. The state promises to solve all problem, and citizens are relieved to accept that “they” will deal with it.
They, that is, officials, servants, institutions. This arrangement blocks permanence: expectations accumulate up, inactivity increases at the bottom.
The exit from this trap begins with the designation that local activities are a laboratory of democracy. This is where you can test solutions, practice compromises, check cooperation mechanisms. But only if the initiatives truly stay bottom-up. erstwhile social activity becomes exclusively a domain of professional NGOs, it turns into a marketplace of services and grants. work does not then return to the State, but moves to the marketplace – and the citizen can again stay a passive consumer.
The accelerator state so does not trust on the outsourcing of citizenship. It is about creating a framework that allows those who want to engage.
One of the key elements is the discussion spaces. For some, it is simply a forum or a group in social media, in which officials and experts actively answer the questions of the inhabitants. For others – a common room, a library or a hall in the municipal office, where you can meet and translate the conversation into circumstantial plans. The net is not an enemy – on the contrary, for many people it is the easiest way to combine responsibilities, overcome mobility barriers or have access to debate at all. But it must be tense with physical infrastructure that gives the conversation a real form and entrenched it in place.
Work!
Therefore, it is besides essential to change the logic of the grant system. Today, it is up to citizens and organisations to match their initiatives with top-down "shore conditions". In the model of the accelerator state it should be the opposite: it is the institutions that identify good bottom-up ideas and come with a proposal for their support. "Your task works, we can aid you scale it" – this attitude turns bureaucracy into a partner alternatively than a barrier.
The accelerator state does not pretend to do everything itself. But it has tools at its disposal to velocity up what truly works: to give method facilities, means and visibility to initiatives that have already proven their effectiveness.
This allows local laboratories to transform into strategy solutions – not through central planning, but by strengthening what truly grows out of the community.
Business and social capital
Communityism does not end with citizens and a country. The 3rd actor to be included in the game is business. In the conventional model, his function came down to 2 things: occupation creation and taxation payment. This was adequate to recognise that the company was "full of its responsibility".
It's not adequate today.
The Communities anticipate business not only to have an economical presence but besides a real contribution to building local social capital.
In practice, this means that the company that invests in a given place besides becomes a neighbour. And a neighbour expects more than a monthly transfer.
You're producing electricity? Share free bike loaders and scooters to residents. You run a sawmill? Build benches on the field or equip the skylight with furniture. You got a large industrial plant? Support the local library, sports club or community center. specified gestures are not an old-fashioned philanthropy. It is an investment in reputation – and reputation, based on trust and closeness, is present becoming capital as crucial as financial gain.
Here, too, comes feedback mechanics. The more the local community sees that the company acts as a good neighbour, the more it cooperates, the easier it accepts its presence and even supports development. Trust is not born from ads and billboards, but from the fact that residents see the circumstantial effects of caring about the environment all day.
In the interests of well understood business, therefore, it is not an external player but 1 of the pillars of the community.
It gains not only social acceptance, but besides the "licence for action" that local reputation gives it. It is simply a licence that cannot be bought – it can only be developed by a consistent, visible commitment to the community's life.
Point – the promise of a civic game
Business well understood in the 21st century cannot trust on passive anticipation that “they” will do something. Neither you nor the marketplace will solve all our problems. But together with citizens they can make a deal where regular activity is not a luxury of a fistful of enthusiasts, but a part of the average life of the community.
The state in this strategy becomes an accelerator – it gives tools, facilitates communication, strengthens what works. The community creates position and visibility – it rewards its heroes of everyday life and shows that it is worth getting involved. Business becomes a neighbour who invests in trust, not just in walls and machines.
This is how a strategy is created in which the energy of citizens finds a appropriate outlet. Laikas and memes do not should be the other of real action – they can be their extension and catalyst. The dispute does not should be war – it can be a music in which everyone has a party. And subsidies request not be a tedious conclusion – they can knock on the door of those who have already shown that they can change reality.
This is the fresh promise of a well understood business: not a top-down omnipotence, but a bottom-up game where everyone has a chance to win along with others.
