For centuries, strength was what everyone wanted, what they sought. Weakness was something contemptible, whether in an individual or in a nation. Showing deficiency of valor in the face of the hardships of life was ridiculous to our ancestors. We are presently dealing with precisely the opposite.
More and more people play the eternal loser, scope out to others, cry loudly over their alleged wrongs. And anyone can be the wrongdoer: another nation, history, husband, wife, boss, society. It's a mechanics akin to the cartoon Tom and Jerry, where all the merciful cheer on the mediocre mouse, not the cat. The race of the victims is to gain individual benefits by exasperating remorse for alleged harm done by the individual or society as such.
The most symptomatic example of this is the strategy adopted by the judaic people. The tragedy of ancestors is an chance for them to make large money. By means of the Holocaust religion, all words of criticism are suppressed. What's incorrect with this arrangement? You must be Hitler's gravestone and anti-Semite. Thanks to the training conducted by the media, we are all to cry over the misery of the Jews, grapple for the moneymakers. The author of this article is of the opinion that if there were a reverse situation, i.e. Jews would have the chance to save Poles during planet War II, there would not be a single righteous hebrew among the nations of the world, but would have condemned us to demolition for a fewer shekels. No scholarly rabbi would keep a Pole hidden to save him from destruction, and Christians did so.
The fundamental evidence to defend this claim is, for example, how “older brothers in faith” are presently treating Palestinians. The gas region is 1 immense concentration camp, where sad grey blocks and craters dominate Israeli rockets. In Golan Hills, there is an action to expropriate Palestinians from their homes. Palestinian fishing boats are blocked so that this mediocre nation cannot gain money. Palestinian farmers are offered different rates for cup of water than for judaic farmers. Let us not forget – society can be destroyed biologically in 2 ways. Short word means chimneys, gas chambers and concentration camps. A long-term approach is to take distant the anticipation of caring for an economical existence. Without the means of life, each of us would gotta face demolition and death under the bridge. A long-term demolition strategy is being applied to Palestinians. In another words, Jews have always had a dual morality: different to their own, different to strangers; they have always been ungrateful to their benefactors.
erstwhile a terrorist attack takes place in Europe, what is the reaction of the peoples of this continent to violence? I'm Charlie. I'm gonna go paint the street with crayons. I'll change the profile image on the social networking site. I'll cry a small and express my outrage. In another words, in view of the demonstration of power, we show weakness, we show how badly we are hurt, unhappy. In this way, we are just adding fuel to the fire, encouraging others to carry out an even more violent attack in the future. And how was this case solved 120 years ago? In the situation of the shooting of Clemens von Ketteler, a German diplomat in China, Wilhelm II Hohenzollern gave a Hun speech, after which he sent an expeditionary company to suppress the uprising of boxers.
But let's decision on to the example from another barrel, going back to the theme. Our favourite climate activist Greta Thunberg said in her hysterical speech at a global body: “How could you? You stole my dreams and childhood with your empty words.” These words are so distasteful that they deserve a broader comment. Firstly, Sweden, from which the protagonist of the speech comes, is 1 of the richest countries in the world. What, then, are the youngest regions of the planet to say? What about their dreams, childhood, and dreams, erstwhile you gotta work in any two-dollar mine? Second, this message is simply a blackmail and mocking of the victim, an example of incredible nerve. I am mediocre and unhappy – and it is your fault. I am the climate Winkielried of nations, suffering in their elegant 5 star hotel in the UN for the natural sins of humanity.
no of us are sacred in ecology. Both the cresus and the poor. We have combustion cars in the garages. We besides produce quite a few waste. Producers and consumers participate equally in this dirty game. But we besides have instalments of loans and bills to pay, due to the fact that we don't want to live in clay huts, we want to live in wealth, in average housing and in single-family homes. And all the people of our planet are seeking this prosperity. An alternate to industrial improvement is to build an agricultural amish society, only that in specified a strategy small Greeks die at first better pneumonia, due to the fact that advanced medicines are the consequence of the work of the advanced pharmaceutical industry. The worst thing about all this environmental fun is hypocrisy, it is that we are taught by degenerate elites, people who decision private jets and yachts. And they're telling us with allegations from large businessmen and actors that we eat besides much meat, or that we're going to work with petrol. In another words, the peaks of consumerism, moral degeneration and loose conduct explain to the mediocre how to live. What nerve and disgustingness!
We analyzed the race of the victims in global matters. But what about a more local shot? Consider the attitude of modern women. How many men are falsely accused of rape, violence, harassment all year? In the west, where the war of the sexes continues throughout, even looking at the girl frequently leads to a charge of microaggression. Modern courts issue biased sentences, as long as the sex of beauty is satisfied. kid care in divorce cases usually falls to mothers, even pathological ones. And women like to confabulate, fabricate evidence, make beautiful eyes, just to rob a player of his wealth.
Young people flee massively from villages and tiny towns, forcefully storming large cities, leading to the expansion of megalopolis. Everyone hopes for large careers and large money, and yet there is only large disappointment. As a consequence of these trends, real property prices scope cosmic levels in capital cities. The cry of “young, educated, and from large centres” immediately appears here: and why did the state not build for my humble, injured municipal dwelling? Later, on the street, they shout, "Landing by law, not by goods." According to them, a man deserves something for living. That's a mistake. All possessions require combat, sacrifices, and hardships of existence.
Theoretically, we are all equal, but equality must, according to progressives, be helped by the alleged affirmative discrimination. If we have besides many men on the board of supervisors or parliaments, then we must introduce a parity. So, where it's good and warm and decent, that's where it takes equality. But there is no request for equality in conventional sectors dominated by blue collars. Consider: waste segregation, construction, sewage works, wood treatment, slaughterhouses – these are industries dominated by men. There's no more hand forest here, so let the gentlemen handle it. Oh, you know, shorter retirement age for women? Done. Is there a war going on? Relax – within equality we will only appoint men. In peacetime, however, we will introduce separate criteria for fitness tests for women and men in recruitment to the uniforms. The enemy won't shoot the ladies! In conclusion, by posing as an injured woman, they search legal privileges, frequently under the cloak of equality.
The simultaneous promotion of egalitarianism and the explanation of affirmative discrimination leads to contradictions. If we give 1 group a privilege, for the another group the same privilege will be to take distant life’s chance and loss. However, the strong pushing of little capable individuals into positions leads to the collapse of standards, to the regulation of mediocrity. For example: if we force minorities into medical studies as part of affirmative action, then in any time we will endure on the operating table as patients, due to the fact that years ago we deprived more ambitious individuals to become surgeons. There is no equality in the planet of nature or in the human world. And why should we prosecute it? For what reason? Who decided, and why?
White people, according to fresh standards, should be collectively ashamed of their history, for racism, for colonialism, for their privilege of white skin. You can't say the incorrect thing about Native Americans or black people. These are naturally injured, so to them you should be leading, you gotta feel sorry for any historical harm. It is nothing that the past of mankind is in fact a past of wars, bloody oppression and conquest of any over others. alternatively of being arrogant of our ancestors, who were clever, operational, resourceful, and battlesome, we are to be ashamed of our roots. According to progressives, wild, pagan and inept cultures represent value in themselves, they represent a higher value than the emanation of technological and method civilization. A society that lives in clay huts without sewers, or any cannibals from the Amazonian wilderness, is expected to have the same meaning as a society that builds powerful factories and respective 100 meters tall towers.
Karol Skorek
The author is president of the Board of the Association of Entrepreneurs and Farmers SWAYAK
