Gender War as a tool for social atomization and combating fertility. Who is the real origin of the conflict between men and women?
Modern Western culture is increasingly presenting relations between men and women in terms of constant conflict. In the media, tv series, political debate and social media, the same pattern returns: a man is to be a oppressor, a female is simply a victim, and a conventional household – a space of hidden force and inequality resulting from the mythical 'patriarchate'.
This communicative is frequently referred to as the "sex war". However, its effects go far beyond online disputes or ideological discussions. It is increasingly evident that the long-term instigation of antagonisms between men and women leads to a breakdown of social ties, household crisis and a dramatic decline in fertility.
Sole Article published by the portal PCh24.pl points out that the "sex war" is not a natural social state but a communicative sustained by the media, pop culture and ideological environments. According to authors, the conflict between a female and a man is frequently artificially exaggerated and portrayed as an inevitable component of modernity.
One cannot neglect to announcement that specified communicative serves the left and globalist political and economical elites highly well. A society based on strong families is harder to control. The household creates a natural community of loyalty, imparts values, builds local ties and provides safety to the individual outside the structures of the state or large corporations. Meanwhile, a single, uprooted and unrestrained individual becomes more dependent on the market, state institutions and media communications.
Gender war perfectly fits into the logic of the modern economical model. A man focused on competition, career and individual consumption is easier to submit his life to economical mechanisms. Putting off marriage, giving up children or breaking up relationships bring immense benefits to many sectors of the marketplace – from the amusement industry, to dating applications, to the real property marketplace and intellectual services. Conflict becomes a product that constantly needs to be sustained due to the fact that it generates emotions, attention and money.
In practice, this means systematically destroying assurance between men and women. Men are frequently portrayed as immature egoists or possible aggressors, while women are encouraged to see household relationships primarily through threats and the conflict for dominance. At the same time, men are told that paternity and work are a regulation of freedom, and women – that motherhood is an obstacle to professional self-fulfilment.
The effects of this cultural revolution are visible throughout Europe. The declining number of married couples, the increasing loneliness of young people and the evidence low fertility rates are no coincidence. erstwhile women's and men's relations are presented as a field of constant conflict, less and less people decide to build permanent families. As a result, societies age and die out.
In this context, any commentators point out that globalist environments see the demographic crisis not as a problem, but as part of a deep social redevelopment. A smaller number of children means a greater dependence of societies on migration, weakening conventional national communities and easier to transform societies according to a model based on a mobile, rooted unit. Critics of this trend argue that the ideology of utmost individualism breaks down natural social ties and replaces them with the relation of the individual with the state and the global market.
At the same time, it is worth noting that the real problems of men and women be and require a fair debate. Conflicts in relations, force or unequal treatment should not be ignored. However, the problem arises erstwhile individual pathologies are presented as evidence of the request for a lasting war between the sexes. This communicative does not solve problems, but deepens them.
The restoration of a culture of cooperation alternatively of conflict may be a rescue. Women and men are not natural enemies, but complement each other. A unchangeable household remains the basic social cell in which man learns responsibility, solidarity and love. Without restoring assurance between the sexes, it will be hard to halt the demographic disaster and the increasing social atomization.
Contrary to the dominant left-wing narrative, most women and men inactive want lasting relationships, family, a sense of closeness to another man and community. The problem is that modern culture is increasingly hampering the realisation of these natural needs. sex warfare is not the way to emancipation or modernity. Rather, it is simply a mechanics of social engineering, consisting in weakening the family, deepening loneliness and accelerating the demographic crisis of the full West.
We besides recommend: “Green funerals”, another stupid fashion among lefties
