Or possibly it just went well in Venezuela, and that encouraged an attack on Iran. Only Iran is in many ways a different government than Venezuela. The war in Iran was to last for 2 days. After 2 weeks Trump fundamentally fights not only Iran, but already most countries in the mediate East. The planet leader assured that the mark of the attack was to “release” Iranians from a bloody dictatorship. In the media and in reality, even on the horizon there is no "liberation", but we see president Trump trying to drag NATO into this filthy war.
First, the polite invitation to defend the Strait of Ormuz, and erstwhile the consequence of the Natovian states proved to be unsound to the president, the threats came: "You will regret," "ungrateful," "So much America has done for you, and now you regret the trawlers." From Monday to Tuesday or Friday to Saturday president Trump has repeatedly changed his mind. It cannot be excluded that next week he will praise NATO for a reasonable decision to refuse. I mean, it's common knowledge, and possibly president Trump will find out that NATO is simply a defence pact. While the rule of "all for one" (Article 5) applies, this does not mean that, like 1 NATO member, without asking the others, he will invade a sovereign country, the remaining Natov states are obliged to support the aggressor. Whoever started the war in the mediate East, let them defend Iran's shelled tankers. Let him take work for making the barrels of oil more expensive, let him get utilized to the fact that the attack on Iran will increasingly mention to himself as criminal aggression in the ether. president Trump, in love with himself and his decisions, will proceed to pay attention and proclaim it on all occasion that killing innocent Iranians, including women and children, is simply a “great job”. In Polish right-wing media, the subject of the war in Iran appears in the news of the second plan. On tv Republic or in Poland24 they do not have the courage to call Trump's attack on Iran aggression.
A friend, our top ally, cannot be said but in terms of the Iranian terrorist threat. In the presence of president Nawrocki besides the subject of the war in Iran as if it did not exist. The President's office is busy with another crucial matters. Of course, the president's veto comes first. Each veto (justice or not) is another stroke into the government. In vetoing the bill, president Nawrocki wants to be a evidence holder of all time. president Duda vetoed 21 laws during his 2 term, while president Nawrocka did not sign 29 after 7 months of office. The loudest veto is questioning the SAFE Act, that is, in the feeling of most Poles to deprive Poland of money from the EU for funding, reinforcement and improvement of our army. More than 50 percent of Poles surveyed hoped the president would sign the bill. However, he considered, without any reasonable justification, that the EU debt threatens our sovereignty.
When the president justified vetoing the parliamentary SAFE Act in a message that was badly recorded and even worse assembled (this is the remarks at TVP), in almost all conviction there was a deficiency of conviction and uncertainty about the words spoken ex cathedra. 1 thing was certain – refusal is another act of war against the government. This time, it's a war on the nation. Trump is fighting Iran, president Nawrocki can't aid in the mediate East, it's sustaining war in the country.
