– The Sejm passed and the legislature adopted the National Judicial Council Act without amendment. Why does it should be changed?
– due to the fact that so far, in 2017, it's unconstitutional. There is clear confusion as to who should yet find the composition of the KRS. In my opinion, 15 judges should choose... of course, the judges and that is consistent with the constitution. We have 3 divisions of power. The Constitution clearly indicates that the judiciary is separate. It is so hard for the judicial power to be confused with that of another authority.
– But not everyone gets it.
– The saddest thing is that it doesn't scope any judges, and I don't know why that happens. Others frequently find it hard to explain delicate constitutional issues; legal cognition is frequently incomprehensible.
– Not everyone wants to go deeper into legal intricacies.
– However, it should be clear to everyone that it was politicians who chose the KRS judicial section. It is besides easy to realize that no typical of the ultimate Court was elected, and that there was no justice of the military court. In the collegiate body of the National Judicial Council, specified defects make it unconstitutional. In the present part of the judiciary, there are people who hold “wonderful” positions. If the judicial section is contaminated with unconstitutionality, the full council is “infected”.
