PiS treated PSL the same way

Of course, if PiS president Jarosław Kaczyński now says that "Elżbieta Witek belongs to a higher culture and the opposition – to a lower culture", then he forgets or does not want to remember how his organization in the erstwhile word of the Sejm stripped Deputy Marshal of the PSL. Ironically, the Law and Justice, in fact presenting wishful thinking, believed until late (at least this was the media message of the politicians of this group) that he would be able to convince the coalition of the people. Among another things, it was through specified treatment of the organization which would be part of the fresh centre-left government that it was a dream.

Let us remind you that erstwhile PiS did not want to grant a seat in the Presidium to a PSL politician, he besides did not agree to the presence of the typical of the then smallest club in the Sejm in the peculiar Services Commission. These actions were perceived by a large part of the public as deficiency of good will.

History of 2001

As far as the government's refusal to take the position of Deputy Marshal by their political opponents is concerned, contrary to appearances, the Polish parliamentary strategy had an equally interesting past more than 2 decades ago. In 2001, the SLD-PSL coalition formed after the election denied the position of Deputy Marshal of PiS. Only after 3 years, in 2004 there was a change. possibly in the erstwhile word of the Law and Justice, the leader of this organization was memorable and did not spare the ruling then specified an insult, as he most likely perceived?

Bosak will be Deputy Marshal

The fact that Krzysztof Bosak, contrary to predictions, will become 1 of the Vice Marshals proves that not so much political views played an crucial function here as individual relations. It seemed a fewer days ago that the rejection of both Elizabeth Witek's candidacy and the Confederacy's policy could be real. As for Bosak, the argument on the opposition side was about as follows: "Confederation is simply a extremist party, especially with a extremist worldview". Meanwhile, Bosak will yet receive this function, which will be a political discrimination for him.

How is Bosak different from Witek?

Bosak, let's give it back to him, he didn't get active in verbal harassment with PiS or PO politicians. Even if he presented extremist views, he tried to be distant from the antagonisms of the Polish-Polish War, presenting an alternate to the PiS-PO duo, which was aimed at – most mostly – right-wing voters, frequently even ultraconservative. Meanwhile, Elżbieta Witek in her time ordered an unauthorised reasumption of the vote on lex TVN, the PiS with her consent could push through crucial projects in the Sejm in rule in 2 hours. These were not standards of good democracy. Moreover, there is simply a frequent interruption of Members at the time of their statements, preventing debate on average terms. Elżbieta Witek was surely not the talker of the Sejm in charge of the fact that there were not very serious scenes in the Polish parliament.

Doesn't the deficiency of a Vice Marshal aid the PiS?

Paradoxically, the rejection of Elizabeth Witek's candidacy by the Sejm, in which the KO, the 3rd Road, the PSL, has the advantage, may let the PiS to narrate the usage of a sanitary cordon to this party, to fuel hostility towards it. specified rhetoric can most likely be maintained by the current electorate, but it seems that he will not convince anyone another than these "folks". For many people will think about the situation with Elizabeth Witek. Her candidacy wasn't lost for no reason.