Wine of the PiS

stary-bob.blogspot.com 1 month ago

From the outside of the communists Putin and his Ukrainian banders, and inside the PiS, they pour sand into the coalition mode of the government headed by Prime Minister D. Tusk.And it is to be good in Poland, as external and interior divers interfere?

If, apart from the majority of the parliament, coalition ministers inactive had the power to manage the resorts, neither Putin nor Kaczyński would be an obstacle. due to the fact that these competences do not hold everyone liable but themselves.In the case of KPO, according to what the Prime Minister said is guilty of PiS. The PiS blocked the fund, they said they even liquidated the accounts so that the money could not be transferred. They are stronger in the EU than the Prime Minister, as Tusk said erstwhile they blocked. This communicative Tusk accepts, people with higher education from large cities, or their elite of fools. Did Tusk get acquainted with the message of his organization deputy Trzaskowski? https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1015581773396658 What laws have been changed by the fresh government to unlock the money?None!

There wouldn't be a problem with passing blame if it wasn't for the accident. The cases of distribution of money in the HoReCa industry, which showed the inability and incompetence of the people liable for the project, were revealed. Government spokesperson Adam Trapka whose task is to announce the success of the government and hide its failures came up with the thought of charging the blame of the predecessors. "PiS, Jarosław Kaczyński and all those in the PiS were liable for governing, they should be the last to say anything about it, due to the fact that the HoReC programme itself and what form it has (...) was prepared 100% by Grzegorz Buda". Demagog checked this message and found it false.

By the way, Szlapka in his speech showed the indolence of this government. respective months to regulation knowing that, Tusk "unlocked" the KPO and did not make a transparent program is the first defeat and the second is the spokesperson who in his statements has more defined lies than truth.

Another player, president Nawrocki, entered the game. This extends the scope of the coalition's maneuver to burden president Nawrocki's own ideas. We already have the first example.

"President Nawrocki promised inexpensive electricity and so decided to veto a bill guaranteeing... inexpensive electricity. What don't you understand?" wrote Tusk.

I do not realize how in a harmful wind bill about which I will compose in the close future it is possible to insert "freezing of electricity for the 4th fourth of this year. What don't you understand?