General Andrzejczak is simply a supporter of the CPK

On Saturday, Krzysztof Stanowski spoke in Channel Zero with General Rajmund Andrzejczak, who late won many supporters. erstwhile Chief of General Staff of the Polish Army, who resigned most likely as a consequence of a conflict with then Minister of National Defence Mariusz Błaszczak, captured many people with his insight, a modern look at Polish armed forces, reasoning strategically about Poland's development.

In this conversation General Andrzejczak spoke positively about the CPK:

– If we want to play a crucial function in this part of Europe, it is hard to find a different answer than, of course, yes to the CPK. This investment is primarily crucial from a national point of view, and it is only later that we can go further. As we look historically, we see the function of flows, transport, communication. I don't know what kind of mention points the Republic is looking for here. possibly erstwhile we built Gdynia or even highways... After all, the road network has improved importantly in fresh years. Whether the question of our LNG terminal in Świnoujście, which is not only an component related to energy, but besides to the widely understood communication of resources. If we want to play a crucial role, and we know that we are in the mediate of these systems, between the large Chinese economy, which will undoubtedly push west and the interests of another players who would like to participate, then from this point of view the CPK seems to be an absolutely crucial project. Not just as an airport, smart city, infrastructure around it. But from a strategical perspective, far-reaching Poland seems absolutely crucial.

Significant words from an American expert

Interestingly, besides from Washington, Poland receives interesting opinions on the suitability of CPK:

NATO must focus on improving military mobility, especially on its east border, and projects specified as Via Baltica, Via Carpathia or Central Communication Port should be the highest priority – wrote Andrew Michta, American political scientist, on platform X.

Arguments of the Government Plenipotentiary for CPK

Let us now quote a typical of the camp of power:

— I know that the army can usage any infrastructure for defence purposes. “In a conversation with Business Insider Maciej Lasek, he added that “Opinion on the possible usage of existing or future transport infrastructure is simply a military matter‘. — They are liable for planning actions in the event of a military threat. He stressed.

At the same time, Maciej Lasek is very firm in the assessment of CPK:

— However, looking at the unrealistic timetables for the construction of the CPK (developed by the erstwhile crew – ed.), it would be a large mistake to tie defence plans to this project. Especially given the current political situation “ He comments.

Expert doubts

Contrary to the narratives of the current opposition, not all experts agree in the assessment of the suitability of the CPK:

— The thought of building an airport with all the infrastructure is right. But erstwhile you look at the implementation, there are doubts. “In an interview with Business Insider, General Bogusław Bębenek, a national safety expert associated, among others, with the Vistula University.

Experts frequently point to the fact that so far no shovels have been put into the construction of this megalight, and this task has been discussed for many years. This makes it hard to estimation erstwhile a real possible strategical investment like this could service passengers and possibly the army.