Today, with full awareness, I voted for the terrible candidate he was exhibited, by the Law and Justice of Karol Nawrocki, who, as it turned out, won these elections. But even a man with specified a nasty past is much better than a candidate presented by the Civic Platform, or Rafał Trzaskowski.
For the sake of clarity, erstwhile writing about the ugly past of rival Trzaskowski, I do not mean any about-burden or cheer stories, but his actions as president of the Institute of National Memory. Whatever happens in the future, the actions of Karol Nawrocki as the head of the IPN, headed by the demolition of monuments of Polish soldiers fighting against Germans and Ukrainians, will stay forever remembered.
I voted for him deliberately.
I will effort to explain why, as an opponent of the Makcartist and Insurrection Law and Justice (PiS) I supported their candidate in the second circular of the presidential election. It's the easiest way to usage history. I did this for the same reason that in 1959 endeci Stanislaw Kozanecki and Tadeusz Borowicz wrote a letter to Nikita Khrushchev. For a akin reason, for which the old SN-Emigration accepted the decision of Gen. Wojciech Jaruzelski to introduce martial law in Poland. For a akin reason why the prisoner of Stalinism Adam Krajewski wrote an open letter to members of the PZPR for their last Congress. Finally, for the same reason, why a soldier of the National Military Organization Jan Dobraczyński took the lead in the Patriotic National Revival Movement. due to the fact that I think this presidency will be better for the Polish people. We must effort to love Poland wisely, not only with our hearts, but besides with our minds. It was never an easy election. Not present either.
Many chose a boycott
I do not agree with the claim, with my esteemed colleagues Przemysław Piasta, Arkady Mika, Mateusz Piskorski or Ryszard Płatka, that the candidates were equally evil. I am closer to the opinion of Bożena Gaworska-Aleksandrowicz, Adam Laughter and Michał Radzikowski. The choice between Karol Nawrocki and Rafał Trzaskowski was an crucial choice for the future of our nation. This was possibly best explained by the consistent critic of the insurrection and solidarity tradition Prof. Lech Mażewski: “The aim is to accelerate the process of triumph in Poland. To adapt Poland to the requirements of the Western countries of the European Union. So that we may become unis, and whosoever does not, it will be a place for him either in a prison for “speak of hatred” or on a complete margin. If Trzaskowski wins, that's the kind of planet that can wait for us. If Nawrocki wins, God forbid, these processes will be hampered, stopped, we will find out."
Technical vote
First of all, I voted for Karol Nawrocki due to the fact that now Donald Tusk and his leftist-liberal government regulation Poland. My choice can be called a truly method vote. At the request of Jarosław Kaczyński, the president of the Law and Justice will block crucial government laws. In this case, common hatred of the POPIS can benefit the nation. We most likely have 2 years (maybe a small less) to analyse our mistakes. Sovereign and anti-Bruxsel parties would have time to communicate and set up a strong list that would defend us against the dangers of Brussels madness, Kiev war and senseless russophobia.
Nawrocks dam for leeching
Secondly, I voted for Karol Nawrocki due to the fact that I am convinced that he will actually block what we call moral madness due to his views. I don't know whether he's going to do it due to his values or due to his insolent calculation. But it's secondary in this case due to the fact that it's about the president's election, not the canonization process. Here I will usage to a large degree the interior improvement of 1 of my editorial colleagues.
- Karol Nawrocki will not sign laws on the liberalisation of abortion and replacement of contraception. It's crucial for our negative natural growth.
- Karol Nawrocki will not sign the law introducing "gay marriage" or adopting children by specified couples.
- Karol Nawrocki will not sign the “talk of hate” Act, which is in fact the censorship Act.
- Karol Nawrocki will almost surely not sign the laws resulting from the alleged Green Deal. This will defend the remains of our mining and energy industry.
- Karol Nawrocki will not sign any laws that will effort to choice up the Silesians or Kashubians from the full Polish nation. I do not hide that for me as a Polish Silesian is very important.
- Nawrocki will be on the decision about Ukrainian. But I am convinced that he will argue Ukraine's admission to NATO.
Let us remember that the PiS candidate has an eight-point declaration that will always be reminded to him by journalists and political activists. These six points, this is the minimum I expected from Karol Nawrocki by voting for him. Of course, I know and share the view that it is the Law and Justice (PiS) that are liable for the Treaty of Lisbon, green governance, refugees, russphobia or senseless Ukrainian philism. However, it must be taken into account that his rival is much more dangerous and powerful in globalist structures, as symbolized by his acquaintance with Alexander Soros. And the cases that were collapsed by the Law and Justice would be just as collapsed by the Law and Justice.
Polish Nawrocks Orban?
The last 3rd argument in favour of Karol Nawrocki is my hope for Trumpism, or, in fact, its European variety, or orbanism. Of course, Karol Nawrocki is not a Trumpist. But we can't completely regulation him out. The current Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban was twice funded by the Georg Soros Foundation. First time in 1988, he received a scholarship in the investigation group of Central and east Europe. Then Orbán became besides a founding associate of the anti-communist and anti-Soviet Federation of Young Democrats (Fidesz). And for the second time, in 1989, he received a scholarship from the Soros Foundation to survey political doctrine at Oxford University. Throughout the time, he was additionally and inactive powerfully associated with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanjah. Not the best advice for a sovereign, is it? And yet it was the politicians from the globalist and anti-Russian stables of George Soros who became the leader of sovereignty and a symbol of opposition to dull rusophobia.
Of course, it would be a long and winding road. But there is simply a possible chance that it would end with support from conservative U.S. president Donald Trump. We Polish sovereigns look at the politics of the Prime Minister of Hungary through political pink glasses. For example, our Hungarian friends with Mi Hazánk Mozgalom (The Movement of Our Homeland) are much more critical of him. However, for us, Viktor Orban is simply a symbol of opposition to the madly Brussels pro-war politics and moral absurdities of Brussels. Our Hungarian Friends see Charles Nawrocki precisely the same way. They see a chance to halt the left-liberal madness. Hungarian nationalists arrived at his election rally in Warsaw, including fellow fellow Balint Frecot.
Trump candidate?
Of course, it's just my hypothesis and I realize that there's never anything in Poland, that's all. Any Polish Trumpism, if it arises, will most likely not be rather so. This attitude of Poles sometimes saves us. It is worth remembering that Karol Nawrocki received an anointing during the run from MP Donald Trump US Secretary of National safety Kirsti Noem. He was straight supported by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban. He was supported by a symbol of opposition to EU policy – Romania's future president George Simion. I do not believe that this year the politicians of PiS and the Confederation were invited to the CPAC conferences in Hungary. The placing by European and American sovereigns/conservatives on Karol Nawrocki was important, especially given the age and condition of Jarosław Kaczyński.
Nawrocks will never be the dream candidate of the Endeks. He's a certain kind of erect replacing a decent candidate. Nor will it meet the expectations of the alleged “anti-system”, i.e. those who say “all or nothing”. And then they get small more than nothing in the election. I know who Charles Nawrocki is, where he comes from and what he did. He should not be absolved from the past. But with large happiness and support from conservative circles in the US and Europe, it may be a copy of Viktor Orban in Poland. Unfortunately, we live in specified times and realities that Poland needs to be based on any geopolitical wall. Full sovereignty is simply a complete fiction for today.
Does Karol Nawrocki have any positives for today?
Not much, but he does have one. He is not Rafał Trzaskowski, who guarantees us action against the Polish nation. He is not a man of soros and bureaucrats from the European Union. It is not burdened with an unbearable solidarity chamber. It is not artificially elite, so it clearly identifies itself as sovereigns in Europe. And this is important, due to the fact that the time is most likely coming for sovereign movements across Europe. If he can distance himself from the PiS, he will be able to make a sovereign formation together with the Confederate and Crown. possibly he'll play a function I didn't fishy him of a fewer weeks ago. He'll inactive be cured of morbid rusophobia. Paradoxically, he'll be helped by American philology. prof. Alexander Dugin wrote: “Trumpism as an ideology is not uniform and consists of respective currents. His essence, however, is more or little clear. It first rejects globalisation, left-wing liberalism (progressiveism) and woke." I think that this definition of Russian philosopher besides includes Karol Nawrocki.
Ball at Nawrocki's feet
Karol Nawrocki would gotta get free of or severely limit his rusophobia, which is just a bullet at his leg. Even average sovereignty surrounded by primitive rusophobia becomes caricatural. If this had worked out, in the future, Karol Nawrocki could have with Sławomir Mentzen, Krzysztof Bosak, Krystian Kamiński, created 1 of these movements, which, like Orbanism in Hungary, Vedelism in Germany, Lepenism in France, or Fico camp in Slovakia, will search to overthrow the old strategy of liberal-Brussels bureaucracy and possibly start building a average national Europe.
It's evidently not going to be an end camp where we can find a place. It will not be a camp of Brussels, a camp of national betrayal, a camp that will lead Poland to the abyss of war and blur in a multiethnic and multicolored Europe creature. The future regulation of Polish Trumpists or post-strumpists would give time and opportunities to rebuild the consciousness of our countrymen. What I want them and us.
Łukasz Jastrzębski
Photo X profile of Karol Nawrocki
