"WHO calls for "simulation" to prepare for next global pandemic"(video)

The proposed simulation would include associate states and key

stakeholders, assessing the draft agreement and amendments International

wellness Organisations (IHR) before the finalisation and adoption in 2024. Expects

will be held later this year, offering insight into the mechanisms of force,

equality, consistency and accountability of the proposed Treaty and amendments.

Joy Phumaphi, co-chair of the GPMB, stressed the urgent need

investigating fresh conditions. "We feel very powerfully that we cannot

wait for another emergency to find out how good it will be

work the pandemic agreement and the IHR amendments; we request to know now" -

said Phumaphi. She proposed that associate States and others

key stakeholders participated in simulation based on

draft agreement and amendment this year.

At the gathering of Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, head of the WHO,

besides stressed the importance of commitment The current generation in such

agreement, highlighting the destructive impact Coronavirus pandemic

Wuhan (COVID-19). (Related: Research shows that American hospitals do not

are prepared for the next pandemic.)

He even warned that the next pandemic was inevitable, calling countries to

take immediate action. "If we don't make the changes that have to

To be introduced, who will? And if we don't do them now, then when?"

NGOs and experts

. wellness protests against negotiations

behind closed doors

While negotiations between 194 nations are ongoing to centralise

pandemic activities within the WHO, this process took place in favour of

locked doors in Geneva.

In April, US delegates, along with their Chinese counterparts, agreed

keep the fresh IHR in public. In consequence to respective non-governmental organisations

The benefits and wellness experts expressed their protest against secrecy in the letter

addressed to the Secretary of wellness and Social Welfare Xavier Becerra and

Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

"The effort to make a veil of mystery surrounding now substantive and technical

negotiations based on the text on the WHO pandemic treaty constitute

a dangerous precedent for setting standards at multilateral level" -

It's written. "It besides undermines assurance in the process at a time erstwhile attacks on WHO and

The pandemic agreement is increasing".

Similarly, Ambassador Pamela Hamamoto, a U.S. representative, stated: "On

I have any concerns about making the task available to everyone.

curious parties, given where we are in this process".

Among the controversy GPMB published Manifest Ready, stressing the need

a coordinated approach to prevention, preparedness and response

pandemics (PPPR) involving all countries, global organisations and

regional, financial institutions and the private sector.

His imagination is consistent with the concept "One Health," which extends the consequence scope to

pandemic, including various factors specified as agriculture, poorness and climate change.

These factors may contribute to or exacerbate the outbreak and affect

the general state of human health.

David Bell, a public wellness doctor and erstwhile WHO worker specializing in

Epidemic politics, explained that "One Health" includes everything in the biosphere that

affects people's well-being. The current negotiated conditions have

intent extending the mandate of the WHO and granting its powers no response

only for real pandemic crisis situations, but besides for

the perception of pandemic threats.