Who am I going to vote for in the upcoming election? This question has been asked to me respective times. Sometimes I'd get into problem that my group was the Confederate. All so that I may be provoked, but I will not answer the title question directly, but I want to explain here the issues that are worth considering erstwhile making a decision.
The communicative of the supposedly good intentions of politicians and parties taking part in the election should be inserted between fairy tales. Let us remember, all declarations and promises on any side are deceit and hypocrisy and aim to gain power over us, and surely not to service us. So, for us, only the effects of their actions to date should count, due to the fact that only these are real. Everything else is theatre and pretending. What matters is the informing erstwhile 1 of the politicians accidentally blabbers something and reveals real intentions.
What I mean, erstwhile I compose about the real effects of action, possibly he can explain an example. In many countries, liberals and left, or supposedly defenders of women and advocates of their rights, stood for the introduction of strict and long-term lockdowns. Never head that they were pointless and in the light of all medical cognition of the last 100 years they had no substantive basis. The effects of lockdowns, a crucial increase in force against women and a real limitation of their rights, for example to healthcare, including abortion, are important. In Poland, thanks to misogynist governments, the populist lockdown was milder and thus little negative effects on women. Meanwhile, Liberals and the Left attacked the government for not sufficiently decisive action, demanding stricter restrictions and extending the duration of closure. So it is reasonable to presume that if they ruled, they would have done the same thing as abroad with the same negative effect on women as there. So it becomes clear that there is no translation of the declaration into reality, their contradiction.
I focus on the 2 biggest parties, due to the fact that the voting strategy adopted has a decisive impact on the post-election political scene. Furthermore, the views and objectives of the another parties do not disagree so importantly as to require peculiar treatment. I've already written about the Left and the Confederacy.
I was going to prepare a fewer essays on various subjects that are besides complex to be adequate for a brief calculation. I could then trust on them, explaining my position. It didn't work out much, you can't push the election deadline, and you might end the writing before the voter silence. Only the WHO text was created from the planned series. However, not all is lost, due to the fact that respective earlier texts besides gotta do with the elections, so I will sometimes remind them.
Media
First, let's look at the media. Media shapes opinions, and they translate into support in elections. Of course, they yell at us from everywhere, as the media marketplace has monopolized the ruling organization due to the fact that it owns public media, etc. The veracity of this message depends, of course, on the context, and in this case the appropriate context is the 8 years of the Platform's rule. And remember that regardless of who is in power, the PO has in the media favorable allies in the form of TVN, Electoral Newspaper, weekly Politics and Newsweek, respective radio stations. It is now and it was then. Only then the PO had the public media to add to it, which it totally seized and someway did not bother anyone, at least among its supporters. possibly it was more elegant and not so thick, but it was. During its rule, the Platform had virtually all major media on its side, public and private. It was a real monopoly. possibly that is why we have heard small about the scandals involving the Platform politicians, and now we are being told that these scandals were not there, that it was only about Minister Nowak's watch for respective tens of thousands, alternatively than his participation in respective scandals. erstwhile he ceased to be Minister in Poland, he inactive managed to gain it in another countries. At the time, the Minister explained to everyone that they were justified due to the fact that in Poland it is impossible to live for 6 1000 per period (a fewer years ago).
Similarly with the expertise of government members. For example, the defence minister Bogdan Klich, was surely no better than Błaszczak, but who would remember specified ancient times, and in the media there are fewer traces. Also, different grain scandals, etc., are not the latest invention. Agriculture was managed by a coalitionist, or PSL, but he was besides entitled to this media immunity.
The fact that we now hear so much about scandals involving politicians and PiS appointees is only partially the effect of the number of these scandals. First of all, this is evidence that not all media have been seized by the ruling party, not all of them service against what the opposition claims. Thus, as an nonsubjective assessment leads to the conclusion that the media situation is now healthier in the PiS regulation than it was for the PO.
The situation described is mostly due to the fact that the PO as a spokesperson for the interests of the large global capital has the support of media related to this capital. On the another hand, PiS standing in the way and in these interests the disruptive will always be the enemy of specified media, all thought of it and all action will be criticized. There will always be "independent experts", specified as the finance from a abroad large bank, who are highly critical of his actions, promising disaster. We should remember that. For example, 500+ was going to origin massive inflation and the collapse of the economy, while inflation did not increase, and the programme created respective 100 1000 fresh jobs. On the another hand, this allowed to absorb the unexpected influx of Ukrainian workers.
An uneven optical assessment of access to the media can be demonstrated by the example of local newspapers. Recently, Orlen began buying out various local newspapers, resulting in a terrible outrage at the monopoly of the local press market. It may be right, but erstwhile the Electoral paper (Agora Company) did so a while ago, only fascists opposed it, and democrats and liberals did not mind. Incidentally, local newspapers have long ceased to matter, fewer people read them, even erstwhile they are free, so the investment will not return to anyone.
The reflection is that for many years the only independent average in Poland was NOT Jerzy Urban. He lived exclusively for sale, practically without advertising. He didn't service anyone. He didn't suck up to anyone. He spared no one, showed scandals and stupidity from all sides. By the way, he exposed hypocrisy to various worthy, elegant and immaculate democrats, for which he was not truly suffering, the greater the hypocrites, the more. They supposedly hated the weekly NO, but in fact they disgusted themselves with their own image, which showed them without falsifications and beautys. Unfortunately, the weekly NOT died a fewer years before the death of his editor-in-chief, that is, he constantly appears, but without a ghost. (Just 1 year after Urban's death his wife died, but specified creatures have no human feelings)
Election promises
Once upon a time in 1 organization there was this saying:
When the organization says he'll take it, he'll take it. And erstwhile the organization says they will, they say.
Now we have more parties, but inactive saying is simply a good characteristic of election promises, a reminder that they are mostly only rhetorical figures for election time. I remember Donald Tusk, with an uplifted voice full of artificial enthusiasm and enthusiasm, the same as on his last march on October 1, 2023, before the 2007 elections promised women miracles of the blind, including the right to abortion. After the election for 8 years of the Platform's rule, there was never a appropriate time for this, and erstwhile the left and women's organizations tried to remind them, they were disciplined. Quiet, baby, we've got crucial things to do here, this is not the time for foster care. I can bet that erstwhile the PO wins now, women's rights, including the right to abortion, will again become a substitute subject to postpone. The greater good will be like the "compromise".
He rapidly forgot a fewer another promises, of which I remember now a warm promise to sign the European Charter of Fundamental Rights. It didn't work out well either. By Wikipedia: Prime Minister Donald Tusk's decision and against pre-election promises, the Charter in Poland is subject to a regulation previously negotiated by the government of Jarosław Kaczyński. That's from the promised partnership agreement, and then it was besides a hot subject of the run like this. And now the same after winning the election will one more time be postponed.
And besides the announcement of the settlement of PiS officers, Mariusz Kamiński, Antoni Macierewicz and respective others. If this promise had been realised then, Macierewicz could not have taken office in 8 years and harmed the Polish army as he did. He is guilty of having PiS put him there, but he is besides guilty of having made it possible. I don't remember any more denied promises right now.
I have already made the announcement that all parties are the same in the implementation of the electoral promises, but I have been made wrong. However, the Law and Justice have made any promises in crucial matters. Withdrawal of the retirement age increase, 500+, withdrawal from junior high. Therefore, it would be good for the fans of the PO, whose life has saved the withdrawal of the pension improvement introduced by the PO, to reflect for a minute on their intellectual integrity. Who truly defends their interests? I'm not talking about gratitude, it's not about that, it's about a sober assessment of reality. And it doesn't substance if we call it actions in the interest of people or buying votes. What matters is the real impact on human fate. The platform, introducing this improvement arrogantly against public opinion, besides bought votes, but not voters she had for nothing, just abroad financiers.
Of course, PiS has not fulfilled the promises of housing, but since the days of Gierek and Jaruzelski no 1 has fulfilled them, including the Union of Freedom, AWS, SLD or PO.
Opinions
Each side wants to give us a distorted image of its opponents. So they give us opinions about them and they want us to take them as facts. Jarosław Kaczyński tries to show Tusk as a abroad agent, German or Russian. He doesn't do well, and he's not credible. The deficiency of the effects of specified propaganda does not mean that Tusk does not service abroad forces, which is further discussed.
Donald Tusk on Kaczyński, in his public speeches, is very clever. In short, this manipulation strategy can be put as follows:
Jarosław Kaczyński likes cats, but does not like dogs. He can even kick a dog! Poles will not vote for individual who kicks dogs!!!
And joyful Poles motion and cheer. late utilizing this style, Tusk said that Kaczyński already had a plan to get Poland out of the European Union. He most likely saw the plan, so he should take a image with his telephone and show it now.
Apart from painting opponents in dark colors, the parties are active in creating their own images. The Law and Justice Act is simple, presenting their actions to date and creating themselves based on a friend of the people. Boring.
The platform is much more sophisticated, trying to convince everyone that it is the only typical and depositary of love, goodness, beauty and truth. This requires a powerful dose of hypocrisy, but she has received this abundant inheritance from the Freedom Union. In order to be more credible, various bright characters are taken under their wing, perfectly serving propaganda purposes. After gaining power, the rudder takes over the organization camera, and the idealists are marginalized or put on a mine. It is very interesting that for years the same trick has managed to trick different smart people, perfect activists, artists or another popular characters. If individual has delusions about the advanced moral standards of the PO, he should remember that the Platform assumed "three tenors" and what happened to the another two.
International institutions
I don't think there's any uncertainty here. Xenophobic Law and Justice are suspicious of everything that is not Polish. Kaczyński already has an exit plan. On the another hand, the Civic Platform is modern, informed and open to the world, it will introduce us even deeper. I deliberately utilized specified an assessment description, due to the fact that in "independent" media this is simply a norm. It is worth considering what these 2 attitudes affect reality. The fundamental question is whether the different global institutions are truly good by definition and their actions are beneficial to us. In the following text, I described how the case is in the case of the WHO. In my opinion, this text must be read before the elections.
I wrote there:
The basic problem is intellectual limitations. The request to note and accept the fact that respectable global institutions are not doing anything for our good, that it is on the contrary. These institutions are rather corrupt and service their powers in carrying out their interests, and our welfare is not even taken into account in the calculations. They're only after us.
It is so besides worth considering whether membership of the European Union is surely a benefit. Unfortunately, I did not have time to make this subject, but it is worth knowing that membership does not work on the rule of everything or nothing. It is simply a number of treaties on various matters. They tell us, thanks to Poland's presence in the Union we can travel freely. That is not true. Free travel is bilateral agreements or the Schengen Treaty. A State may be in the Schengen area without being a associate of the Union. besides not all EU countries are in the Schengen area. In general, there are many agreements that can supply benefits to the association without the request to full subordinate the EU bureaucracy. You can either talk or accept 1 without the other.
Poland's accession to the euro region was considered and it is good that this did not happen. The destiny of Greece is the best evidence of how the failure of its own currency exacerbates economical crises by stripping off state finances of compensation mechanisms. In addition, the intention of EU bureaucrats to introduce a digital euro and liquidate cash is yet another coup against our freedom.
Another tools of full surveillance and control are being prepared and implemented by EU bureaucracy. The anticipation of interception and censorship of electronic communications, including journalists and politicians. Force electronic service providers to censor, etc. In fact, the violation of the right of freedom of expression is widespread in Europe now, and the choice of dissidents is limited to the anticipation of travelling. Many of these initiatives are introduced under the prominent slogans of fighting pedophilia, trafficking in human beings, terrorism, but they come down to 1 thing, namely limiting freedom of speech and criminalising opposition and protests. You're against something, and you express it, which means you're a criminal, a terrorist. You request to be gagged and isolated. Of course, this does not concern legitimate protests specified as those demanding green energy, further restrictions on car traffic, CO2 reductions, etc.
Some time ago, there was hope of defending the regulation of law in Poland. It is good to know that EU courts are actually interfering in the affairs of states, but not necessarily rather impartially. Of course, the actions of the Law and Justices limiting the independency of courts are criticised, but akin actions in another countries, for example in Germany are not necessarily the case. Why? These German companies service large capital, pharmaceutical companies, and not in Poland. And that's the difference, but nobody cares. erstwhile I gave this German example (there are many specified events there), it was completely ignored by readers, boredom.
The German court has given a conviction to a justice for ruling against government orders concerning masks
Are we certain we voted in favour of joining specified a Union in the referendum? She has changed since then and is constantly changing in a dangerous direction.
So possibly Janusz Korwin-Mikke was right, complete integration with the Union of Socialist Republics of Europe is not the best idea? Let us dare examine this subject ourselves and sometimes think about it without repeating stereotypes.
Thank you for reading Substack Jack! Sign up for free to receive fresh posts and support my work.
That's what they're not talking about, that's hidden targets.
I suggested criticism of politicians' opinion of their opponents, but I'm certain Donald Tusk's allegations against the Law and Justice are true. He repeats: they want power for their own benefit. It sounds antipathic, but find a politician who wouldn't want power for his own benefit. If it's expected to be a full demasking of the PiS motives, it looks beautiful innocent. In order to benefit from power, they gotta buy voters from time to time, so they cannot break distant from society and its interests.
It is much worse erstwhile a politician who seeks his own benefits while serving individual else. Therefore, Jarosław Kaczyński's allegations towards Tusk that this works for external forces are much more serious. He speaks of abroad powers, but these times are gone. Transnational corporations are now more powerful than powers. And in this sense, the charges are false, due to the fact that Germany and Russia are not the powers of Tusk, and true, due to the fact that there is an external power, much more powerful than these powers, or global capital through WEF. erstwhile politicians service external powerful forces, they sacrifice the welfare of citizens for their interests. He is little afraid about acquiring citizens due to the fact that he knows that behind him is simply a powerful propaganda device of large capital, which will turn a lie into fact and justify all step of it. The subject is developed here:
Of course, most members of the Civic Platform operate in good religion and are unaware of the entanglements of their leaders. This does not change the fact that political parties are not democratic organisations. Democratic intra-party procedures and the will of organization members have only small impact on the activity. Policy directions, and after winning the government elections, the organization leaders decide. And this is where the function of WEF's pupils becomes conclusive. specified as the Prime Minister may proclaim free and democratic slogans to guide us into the subjection of dystopia created by power-hungry billionaires.
There is increasing opposition in Europe to the current climate narrative, pandemic communicative and further EU integration and the dictatorship of EU bureaucracy. Somehow, it is unusual that specified groups (in Poland, Italy, Hungary, Slovakia, Germany -AfD, or in the Netherlands a fresh organization of farmers) are denied legitimacy, the right to exist, the discrediting patches of nationalists, fascists and accuse of all evil. For any reason, the rulers do not want to admit that they are the same political parties as any another party, that they are doing the will of voters, which does not necessarily gotta surrender to the will of global capital.
Threatening the Union by specified slogans — nationalisms — assumes that the right to self-determination of nations is wrong, whereas the abstract and bureaucratic existence of the European Union is absolutely good. There is no discussion about the fact that possibly increasing infinitely and meticulously controlling bureaucracy is an evil requiring eradication. It represents a threat as a key component easy to corrupt and take over, for example by large corporations. In contrast, a fewer simple treaties are adequate for the compatible and fruitful functioning of countries.
Rafał Trzaskowski does not run for parliament. The organization assigned him more crucial tasks. possibly he'll be put on for president in 2 years. What he's doing now should light a informing light on his goals and real far-reaching PO goals. Just like Donald Tusk, Rafał Trzaskowski is simply a janczor of the school of the young leaders of the WEF and implements its program. It serves global capital, and we're pawns.
All its activities are part of the WEF's global plan to limit freedom and increase control of power. Further changes in Warsaw, as street tightening prepares it to be divided into 15-minute areas. In the close term, it is planned to limit entry for cars not gathering arbitrary criteria.
Immediately before the election, the substance went silent to not spoil the Platform's image, but in the event of its win, restrictions will be introduced overnight. It's nothing that your car was legally allowed to decision in Poland. Only the newest models will enter Warsaw. And don't be fooled that it's just a strict center. This was the case in London, and now the ULEZ region has been extended to almost the full city. Also, stories about clean air can be inserted between fairy tales. Where this has been studied, the differences are within the measurement mistake limits. It is about limiting our freedom of movement. The platform is talking about freedom, but it works to take it from us.
Completion
And the dilemma remains, who to choose?
Should we vote for colored foxes dressed in feathers of liberals and democrats? On elegant, educated and well-placed hypocrites teaching from the tallness of average people how to live. They have proclaimed freedom and democracy, who, under the pretext of eliminating hatred speech and reducing misinformation, saving the climate and protecting us from another pandemic, will deprive us of freedom of speech, freedom of movement or the right to decide about our own body. They will be closed in 15-minute cities, in a strategy of social credit and artificially produced food.
But can he vote for a pack of uncouth, poorly educated, and greedy lowlifes whose disgusting regulation will delay, though the above - described universal happiness will come?
Of course, we can hide our head in the sand and without any distractions in the sense of a well-fulfilled work to vote for any nice-looking game without a chance to enter the parliament.
And finally, a parable from ancient India. The wanderer saw a beggar lying on the side of the side of the side completely covered by flies. He took pity on the unfortunate and branched distant a flock of flies. He expected a word of thanks, but the beggar turned to him with remorse. Well, you did, those flies were already eaten.
