Who request John Paul II?

In Poland there were marches to defend the good name of Pope John Paul II. Above all, there are average people who refuse to accept what the media are doing about leftist prowess, who have been trying for years to present the full Catholic Church as 1 large gathering of paedophiles.

Now these media decided to “hunt” not for private priests, but for the Pope himself. It was expected to be the “final cut”. Why do they request it? This was explained precisely by 1 of the most "deserved" in this work – Tomasz Sekielski, writing in "Newsweek", at the head of which, as a reward for the success of this action, the Pope's full teaching about household and morality has no meaning, due to the fact that he himself is powerfully suspicious, due to the fact that he himself "hits pedophiles", as he utilized to specify in this degenerate environment. It is understandable that the LGBT Empire wants to remove the last obstacle in the march to a fresh wonderful world, and this obstacle is the teaching of the Catholic Church about the family. John Paul II was peculiarly delicate on this point, he felt that the family, as a union between a female and a man, was the foundation of society and a nation. This is the origin of the attack on the Pope, and not any "seeking to the truth", as hypocritically convinced by the animators of this hucpa.

But there's the another side of the medal. On the other side, self-proclaimed “defendants” of the Pope, politicians of the Law and Solidarity Poland were appointed. For them, John Paul II is simply a politician who led to the “fall of communism”. Andrzej Duda during an interview for TVP showed a photograph of John Paul II and Ronald Reagan. ‘Two people, I have absolute conviction that has given us freedom” – he added. Let me remind you that the Pope besides had many photographs with another politicians, with Wojciech Jaruzelski (who he valued), with Fidel Castro or Augusto Pinochet. And what does that mean? A rhetorical question. Bringing John Paul II to the function of a “failing commune” or a large supporter of the European Union and alleged Western civilization – is an abuse. John Paul II, if he had lived—what is certain—would not have accepted many things not only on the side of the pioneers of the LGBT Empire, which he had already called the “civilization of death”, but besides of what the solidarity camp is doing—the unchristian logic of revenge from the very beginning, would not have accepted all these chaotic mirrors, stigmatizing and destroying people (videos not settled to this day by the written lynching on Archbishop Stanislaw Wielgus). The Pope would besides be opposed to the wars waged by Ronald Reagan's heirs and now, like Francis, would call not to war but to peace. The sad conclusion is that the real Pope John Paul II is not needed today.

Jan Engelgard

photo public domain

Think Poland, No. 15-16 (9-16.04.201023)