from February, 2018
Written by Henry Makow, Ph.D.
" Rape is an expression of [...] male supremacy... eternal economic, political and cultural exploitation of women by men".
Does that sound like a contemporary extremist feminist? Guess again. It comes from a 1948 brochure by the American Communist organization entitled "Woman Against Myth" by Mary Inman.
In a 2002 book "Red Feminism: American Communication and the Making of Women's Liberation" Feminist historian Kate Weigand states: "idees, activists and traditions that originated from the Communist movement of the 1940s and 1950s continued to form the direction of the fresh women's movement in the 1960s and later". (154)
Weigand, a lecturer at Smith College, shows that contemporary feminism is simply a direct consequence of American communism. There is nothing that feminists said or did between 1960 and 1980 that would not be announced in the CPUSA in the 1940s and 1950s. Many feminist leaders of the second wave were "children in red diapers", children of communist Jews.
Communists were pioneers of political and cultural analysis of the oppression of women. They started "studies over women" and advocated public care of children, birth control, abortion, and even children's rights. They have created key feminist concepts specified as "what is individual is political" and techniques specified as "raising awareness".
In the late 1940s, CPUSA leaders realized that the labour movement was becoming increasingly hostile to communism. They started focusing on women and African-Americans. They hoped that the "male supremacy" "will attract more women to the organization and to fight against the interior policies of the Cold War". (80)
Communist women who constituted 40% of the organization wanted more freedom to attend organization meetings. After publication "Woman Against Myth" In 1948, the CPUSA initiated a process of "reeducation" of men, which we know besides well today.
For example, in the organization paper "The regular Worker" The signature under a photograph of a man with a tiny kid proclaimed: "The families are stronger and happier if the father knows how to fix breakfast cereals, tie bibs and take care of the children." (127)
The organization ordered men who did not take women seriously, to carry out "control tasks to survey women's question". In 1954, the Los Angeles branch office punished men disciplinaryly for "cutting discussions at club meetings, avoiding friends in management and making sex jokes humiliating women." (94)
Film "The salt of the earth"who critic Pauline Kael called "communist propaganda," portrayed women playing a decisive function in the labour strike of their husbands. "Despite her husband's will, Esperanza became the leader of the strike and for the first time earned a function for herself outside the home... [her] political successes persuaded Ramon to accept a fresh model of household life". Portraits of strong, assertive women success have become as common in the communist press and schools as in today's mass media.
Communist women formalized a sophisticated Marxist analysis of the "female question". Books "In Women's Defense" (1940) Mary Inman, "Century of Struggle" (1954) Eleanor Flexner and "The Unfinished Revolution" (1962) Eve Merriam described the oppression of women and condemned sexism in mass culture and language. For example, Mary Inman claimed that "artificial femininity" and "excessive emphasis on beauty" keep women in subjection [33].
The founder of modern feminism, Betty Frieden, on the left, was based on those lyrics erstwhile she wrote The Feminine Mystique (1963). All these women hid the fact that they were longtime communist activists. In 1960, their daughters had everything they needed, including an example of deception to establish the Women's Liberation Movement.
COMMUNICATION NATURE OF FEMINISM
The roots of feminism in Marxist communism explain much about this interesting but dangerous movement. It explains:
- Why "female movement" hates femininity and imposes a political-economic concept of "equality" on a personal, biological and mystical relationship.
- Why "female movement" besides includes "race and class equality".
- Why they want a revolution ("transformation") and have a Messianic imagination of utopia without gender.
- Why they believe that human nature is infinitely plastic and can be shaped by indoctrination and coercion.
- Why they engage in endless, dulling theorems, doctrinal disputes, and fractionality.
- Why fact is for them a "social construct" defined by whoever has power, and appearances are more crucial than reality.
- Why they reject God, nature and technological evidence for their political agenda.
- Why they refuse to debate, do not believe in freedom of speech, and suppress different views.
- Why they act like quasi-religious cults or like Red Guards.
It is hard to escape the conclusion that feminism is communism under another name. Communism aims to give power to marionets of central bankers by supporting divisions and conflicts. Divide and conquer. He failed to lead to a class and race war, and alternatively communism promoted sex conflict. In any case, they were conducive to a sense of harm in the mark group. Now the conventional women's function "pressed" women.
(On the left, another communist intellectual operation)
The moves of "diversity" and "multiculturalism" represent a communist effort to strengthen and exploit another minorities, gays and "colored people", to further undermine majority culture (European, Christian). Thus the first CPUSA trio "race, sex and class" is mostly intact, but the class conflict was never a large seller.
The word "political correctness" was created in the Russian Communist organization in the 1920s. Its usage in today's America illustrates the degree of overthrow of society. Feminist activists are mostly communist. The aim of the communists is to destruct Western civilization and establish a veiled dictatorship called the "world government", directed by toads of central bankers.
We saw this demolition in the dismantling of the curriculum for the teaching of liberated arts and the tradition of freedom of speech and investigation at our universities. We've seen this virus spread to government, business, media and the military. This could only happen due to the fact that the financial elite actually sponsors communism.
In communism, the government is the eventual monopolist. It controls everything, not only wealth, but besides power and thought. It is an instrument of monopolistic capital (i.e. Rothschild, Rockefeller). Everyone, starting with the president, works for them.
LOCAL EXAMPLE
"Political correctness" has dulled and disciplined our cultural life. In 2002, here in Winnipeg, Betty Granger, Conservative school curator, referred to the "Asian invasion" which caused home prices to emergence in Vancouver. Granger was ruthlessly placed under a bar in the press. People sent hatred message and threw garbage on her lawn.
At the meeting, the school board president admitted that Granger no She's racist, and the Asians married into her family. Nevertheless, Granger was censored because, I quote, "pretences are more crucial than reality." This slipping from the anchor of nonsubjective fact is simply a hallmark of communism.
The atmosphere at the gathering was loaded. Mildly disposed Canadians, all advocates of "tolerance", behaved like chaotic dogs, willing to rip a trapped rabbit apart. Betty Granger was repentant and She voted in favour of her own condemnation.
These rituals of condemnation and repentance, typical of Stalinist Russia or Maoist China, are becoming increasingly common in America. They're like demonstrational processes to intimidate people into adapting. We have "diversity officers" and "human rights committees" and "sensibility training" to defender feminist slogans. They talk about "discrimination", but they freely discriminate against Christians, white heterosexual men and conventional women. They usage the spectrum of "sexual harassment" to restrain women's-men's relationships and clear their opponents.
CONCLUSION
In 1980, 3 women from Leningrad produced 10 typewritten feminist diary "Almanach". The KGB closed the letter and deported women to West Germany. In the USSR, feminism was mostly exportable. According to prof. Weigand, her "book provides evidence to support the belief that at least any communists considered the overthrow of the sex strategy [in America] an integral part of the wider conflict to overthrow capitalism".In conclusion, the feminist pursuit of "equal rights" is simply a mask for the hostile communist agenda. The Communist MO has always been fraud, infiltration and subversion, utilizing the issue of social justice as a pretext. Communism can take any form that will strengthen the marionettes of central bankers. The goal is to destruct Western civilization and make a fresh planet order governed by monopolistic capital. This has been mostly achieved.
Red Feminism Kate Weigand shows that we live in a de facto communist society, and this improvement followed a trick with the engagement of the Masonic establishment controlled by central bankers.---
Related: The icon of feminism was crazy, says her sister
Maków - What is Communism?
Watson----- A leading feminist (Jewish) calls for a "collective" revolution
TWH's first comment:
I have no uncertainty that the bankers are behind the many nonsense we are witnessing present in terms of social engineering. I utilized to work for 1 of the top 5 banks in Canada, and I can personally attest that they were constantly pushing this communist propaganda on workers. If the company did not praise the advantages of global Women's Day, it was just talking about homosexuality or how "living" minorities created us. The full strategy was to share people, while telling us that we are all the same (and, of course, making the white, heterosexual majority feel like novice and useless). Only by engaging in any serious cognitive dissonance could you actually swallow their bullshit.
I think the part about Betty Granger in your article is peculiarly conspicuous. She was told that "looks are more crucial than reality." It's been telling me quite a few times since the management I worked for. erstwhile I answered with reason and logic, they simply repeated their line.
When you're the only sane individual in a group of mentally ill, you start reasoning you might be the crazy one. I don't know how people can just keep quiet about it.
I utilized to compare the bank to the countries of the erstwhile east bloc due to the fact that they had their Stasi/KGB in the form of besides nosy and abusive HR representatives (they only enforced what management wanted to enforce and rejected any real concerns raised by white workers – if you work for a large corporation, NEVER Trust H.R.), they had their propaganda arm that permeated everything. They had their legal department, which had papers the size of a novel, so that all worker could be charged with misconduct erstwhile it suits him, and made workers afraid for their jobs if they always decided on any of them. I'm glad he's gone!
Translated by Google Translator
source:henrymakow.com
