“Who are you, Mr. Rafale?”
https://www.salon24.pl/u/opop/1438259,whom-pan-is-pan-rafale
I started listening to the audiobook “Rafal” – the audio version of the book, which is the first interview of the river with Rafał Trzaskowski. This, at least theoretically, an anecdotal communicative about his private life, passions and politics. So much for theory. And it is, but it does not sound like a fascinating communicative of a fascinating man.
It's more of a prose-written poem by Adam Brzechwy: “The self-glory in the corner stood, and she kept saying, ‘I am capable, The most beautiful thing I've got is my clothes, my face is full of health, If I say something, I'll say it, and if I answer it, prudently, at school, I have the best grades, I sing better than at the opera, I ride a bike, I get it. I get it. etc.
In any case, what I listened to from the audiobook is adequate for me to answer Mr Nawrock as a individual bystander to the question that he asked Rafał Trzaskowski during an infamous bill in Koński.
“Who are you, Mr Rafale?”
– Buphon – Trzaskowski should answer. That would be 100% true, due to the fact that as the Grand Dictionary of the Polish Language states, the buffoon is simply a individual who, by his behaviour, shows that he considers himself more crucial and better than others – just as Trzaskowski does. The book “Rafał” not only confirms this buffonada, but it even extends to Baron Münchhausen’s syndrome, as it itself by hair from the swamp pulled out. The full Trzaskowski.
It is not even essential to show that Trzaskowski is simply a flagship product of modern levitation, plunged in the madness of neoliberal, or actually neo-marksist globalism. Soros, Schwab, all these “Bilderbergs” over the years have produced specified “Trzaskowski” dozens, of which about a twelve make or make very crucial political careers. Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Kamala Harris, Justin Trudeau, Ursula von der Layen, Emmanuel Macron, are products of the soros instrumentarium, which in the language of political scholars is called “soft power”. It consists of a network financed by Soros and another (e.g. Schwaba) NGOs. They work in almost a 100 countries of the world. At first glance, they are not political but social, civic or charitable institutions. However, they have the influence of opinion-making, financial resources and the ability to mobilise supporters in liberal-left circles. In times of crisis, they are able to make political events. This can be seen from the example of another countries – to not look far, in Poland it is besides visible.
But in the reflections about Trzaskowski you do not request to say all this – just 1 word: a buffoon. Actually a mega buffoon whose overgrown ego overwhelms his own so hard that Trzaskowski himself does not know who he truly is.
This creates apparent intellectual problems, which Rafał clearly can't cope with and needs an immediate intellectual ambulance like a heart attack. This “cart” became Mrs Natalia de Barbaro – social psychologist, sociologist, social skills trainer, specialist in manipulation techniques and utilizing the word, body speech and all that politicians put in the heads of stupid voters. She was an advisor to Donald Tusk in 2005 and besides for any time later. Lech Kaczyński considered her a master of manipulation – and to make it more fun – it was de Barbaro who praised Lempart's speeches, in which the well-known “You****** pour!”
A psychic buffoon. I hear he likes to pull something up with his nose, but I'm not. Do we truly want a president like that? Seriously, don't we deserve better? You want a president who gets tired of carrying his own ego and “crazy” over it? Then vote for Trzaskowski! It will be fun to watch him get tired of taking work for the state, although in fact – as Krzysztof Stanowski consciously pointed out – the president can not do much and the candidates' stories how they will do this and this can be inserted between fairy tales. But idiotic, or oppressive laws miscarried by Tusk coalition can sign... and that's the game with Trzaskowski.
I think that before the elections it is imperative to go back to reading pre-accession literature. Many Poles, besides many, then, just as now, looked at and looked at the same situations: the freedom of a sovereign, the selling of rulers, lying narratives to justify the unheard of things, and yet – specified a common inability that nothing can be done, despite the reasonable solutions lying on the table.
It is certain that we are approaching the culmination: independence, quarrels, disintegration, disintegration, reflection, pen-warming, and possibly with a sword, burning hopes for a beneficial turn of global affairs. any form of combat, possibly just another emergence in the face of repression, poverty, humiliation and failure of the state, although not of territory. religion in regaining the Brightest.
Only that in a society that mostly delights with a buffoon, it will be highly difficult. Apart from the fact that the elections themselves will most likely have only media significance, due to the fact that the power that so far burned almost all bridges of law, moral rules and the national community of exit is no longer: the buffoon will win due to the fact that it must win. There are besides ways to do this – especially with the full support of the left and soros EU.
There is simply a runner-up in the reserve, to which Poland and the marshalling of the Sejm were confused with the tv show, mediocre quality. And as with buffoons, it's gonna be comic and scary...
Это как тигром: и страшно смешно
