Venezuela opens a fresh world. America shows it's inactive handing out cards

resetobywatelski.pl 2 weeks ago

Perfectly conducted operation in Venezuela – without leaks, without failure of its own, but with a global blood-freezing effect in the veins – has become a signal for many that the United States not only does not lose its position, but actually demonstrates a fresh form of hegemony. In an interview with Paul Sito, lawyer and mediator Roman Rewald unveils the scenes of a geopolitical game in which Donald Trump, Heritage Foundation and American services form a puzzle more complex than media headlines suggest.

Venezuela as a signal to the planet

Nicolás Maduro's kidnapping operation – although symbolic and not straight based on a change of power in Caracas – triggered a global resonance.

Rewald stresses that its importance is not about the local impact, but about the demonstration of possibilities: "If they can do it there, they can do it anywhere."

It was this consciousness, not the destiny of Venezuela itself, that caused goose bumps in the capitals of the world. Russia, which itself tried akin actions in Kiev, saw the difference between amateur and surgical precision.

Trump: A genius of strategy or a performer of another people's plans?

There is simply a discrimination in the conversation:

– Trump as a showman, a champion of hyperbole, a tv man who can “sell” any narrative.

– Trump as a contractor of the Heritage Foundation program – a 900-page plan to rebuild American politics, which his administration implements with an iron consequence.

Rewald has no doubt: “I would not overestimate Trump as an architect. It is Heritage Foundation who wrote the script, and he reads it.”

This explains the apparent contradiction between the President's chaotic kind and the precise geopolitical actions of the US.

Mediations that are not mediations

Witkow's subject – the U.S. envoy who talks with Ukraine and Russia – opens a discussion about what mediation is and what it is not.

Rewald recalls: “The mediator must be neutral. Witkov represents 1 side, so he conducts negotiations, not mediation.”

At the same time, it allows the US to act as a quasi-mediator in a global context if the parties consider them neutral enough. However, this depends on confidentiality and intent – and these stay classified.

Does Trump play Putin?

There is simply a communicative in public space about Trump's alleged pro-rossiness.

The Rewald is simply a game at the highest level. We see only scraps falling off the table.”

If Trump had been Putin's agent, Ukraine would have fallen by now. American services proceed to support Kiev. Complements to Putin may be part of the game, not proof of sympathy.

VENEZUELA OPENS fresh planet - Roman Rewald - Paweł Sito

Greenland – a joke, a threat or a negotiating theatre?

Trump's imagination of Greenland's “buying” seemed absurd.

Rewald, however, sees this as a classical negotiating technique: first a joke, then a repeated joke, then a gag that ceases to be a joke. It is not an invasion, it is simply a renegotiation of the conditions of US presence on a strategical island.

"Grenland is not Trump's whim. This is an American business.”

NATO: No more illusions about free protection

The Rewald recalls that Trumpian "I don't like NATO" does not mean wanting to leave the alliance, but force on Europe to start taking its own defence seriously.

Europe has an economical possible equal to the US, but militarily lags behind. The war in Ukraine brutally exposed it.

VENEZUELA OPENS fresh planet - Roman Rewald - Paweł Sito

The planet By fact

One of the strongest parts of the conversation is the diagnosis of fact in politics. Rewald mentions that erstwhile he arrived in the US in the 1970s, the lie was embarrassing. The Internet, Cambridge Analytics and fresh political culture have made lying a tool – and sometimes even a virtue. This has changed not only America, but the world.

We live in an age of uncertainty – and that is simply a fact

Paul Sito’s conversation with Roman Rewald is simply a uncommon example of geopolitical analysis that does not pretend to be omniscient.

Instead of simple answers, we get a map of uncertainty: What truly happens between the US, Russia and Ukraine? Is Trump a player or a pawn? What are the real objectives of the Venezuelan operation? What will happen in Iran? Is Greenland a gag or a prelude to fresh safety architecture?

Rewald stresses: “We only know what falls off the table. The remainder happens behind closed doors.”

And possibly that's why this conversation is so valuable – due to the fact that alternatively of pretending that the planet is simple, it shows how complicated it truly has become.