Arguments of USAID Maintainers

myslpolska.info 4 months ago

U.S. president Donald Trump suspended payments from the USAID (United States Agency for global Development). This decree hit those whose leftistness was reinforced with Washington money. Having Facebook makes us discuss with different people. Without any names, I will effort to show you a way to reason those people who were agitated by Donald Trump's decision or hysterical about stopping a financial drip from the United States.

The first individual accused me of being a heartless boy of a bitch. The supposedly deficiency of money from Washington will origin AIDS/HIV epidemics and syphilis. According to a young lady, only the United States prevented humanity from copulating widely with those infected with these diseases. I have learned that blocked programs will prevent the transportation of condoms and deprive the young generation of sexual education. Then he added, “Are you happy that they will fuck unhealthyly?” I thought to myself, “Mother Divine, what happened?” After all, it was Political Criticism, the Wyborcza Newspaper, and the OKO.press that I always associate with unhealthy bullshit...

The another 1 considered me anti-democrat. This man believed that the act of the president of the United States would disturb media pluralism in Poland. "Today no 1 will defend civilian society, equality before the law and minorities enough". I was sad to hear what I found out. It turns out that these people are convinced that democracy is possible only if it is maintained by a abroad power. According to their logic, it is fair that many editorials received money from the United States. They received them to advance their model of democracy, and political dogmas. Honesty, after all, would require them to request the financing of competing editorials, e.g. by China, India, Russia and the DPRK. However, specified content on his profile failed to find.

The 3rd discourse touched me with sincerity. He stated plainly: "I took as much as a job, not projects." I realize that if any example justice of the Provincial Administrative Court or any PiS MP took money indirectly from the Russians or Belarusians – but “for work alternatively than projects” – this would be morally justified according to the debater? I'm terrified of that argument.

The 4th amazed with the thought. He stated as follows: "This is political criticism, whoever on our side is simply a banner erstwhile written about it/talking about it". That's an interesting argument, too. If a paper called “Apolitical Praise” were to be created for this, and was publically funded by Hungary, would that net user defend the magazine due to the fact that “this is what you are writing about?” That's an ugly argument.

It is worth noting that the first 3 were openly utilized for long months by arguments – "unice" and "putinists" against opponents of war or critics of Ukraine. The 4th 1 was more moderate. And suddenly, it turns out that the problem isn't just any stinking putin and Lukashenko, it's Biden and Soros' pants. Although in these cases, more diapers. It's not in the minds of the Atlanticists and the lefties that people can have their thoughts and opinions. They cannot realize that political orientation is not due to the direction of the subsidies. Americans, Germans, British or "Hungarian" cresus Georg Soros loaded and loaded money into editorial offices, projects and institutions in Poland. The amounts are huge. There are dozens of specified foundations. They all had to shout about the alleged money coming from Russia, Iran, Belarus or China, so that no 1 would be curious in the real money flowing to supporters of building liberal Nazism. The milk has spilled. present we know who's who and who's behind.

PS. What remains of those who lived with the money they sent from the United States? There are 2 possibilities. First start writing and acting on your own account. Unfortunately, this will not bring any material benefits, but you can look in the mirror and sleep easily. The second anticipation is to change worldview and geopolitical orientations. Go to the fresh ruler, kneel before him, and kiss his hand. Then you've got it under control. Start writing that Greenland is always American. That cows won't gas our planet. And what's crucial is that a 120-pound boxer James with a bird isn't under any comparative princess Olivia. In the case of Law 447 you can stay at the old views. Then possibly any fresh foundation will hug and won't let you starve. Just a goddamn competition.

Łukasz Jastrzębski

Read Entire Article