For Poles, the United States of America is the leader of Western civilization and not schism from Catholic principles that erstwhile funded the West. The Polish optics of looking at the agenda of the Reformation and Enlightenment, which defined the US as a state of Protestant expatriates.
Numerous authors behind Felix Koneczne do not separate between Latin civilization and Western civilization (e.g. Emmanuel Todd, or Kevin MacDonald). The Koneczny position was determined by the experience of closer contact with Russia and Germany than with the Anglo-Saxons. Today's position is the fall of Catholicism in the West. The thesis of this article is that the West is simply a schism from Catholicism and the other conviction from post-contemplational, mainly American culture, which would most willingly erase Catholicism from history, leaving it at most pagan Rome and Greece. While Republican and imperial Rome is reflected in the political strategy (and even in the neoclassical architecture of the USA) we will not find crucial Catholic influences there. The political events of the last decades let us to realise these facts and thus correct the stereotype.
Logo Surveillance
The leak of a paper from Richmond's FBI office in 2023 revealed that U.S. peculiar Services were treating Catholic representatives as a threat. The FBI suggested links between "radical – conventional Catholics" (RTC) and extremist groups. The paper was made available to more than 1,000 FBI staff across the country before its public disclosure. The paper was prepared and reviewed by field offices in Buffalo, Milwaukee, Louisville and Portland. An investigation of the July 2025 home of Representatives Judiciary Committee revealed that the FBI office in Washington was besides active in the case. The FBI was based on definitions of highly left-wing organizations (e.g. confederate poorness Law Center), uncovering specified attitudes as "rejection of the Vatican Council II", "attachment to conventional household values" or "not to be modern." Surveillance besides expanded to include global contacts, including cooperation with the London FBI office to monitor traditionalists abroad.
Currently FBI under fresh direction Kash Patela revealed an additional 1,300 pages of papers that Biden-Wray's administration had previously refused to make available to Congress. Cases of tracking of faithful Catholics (e.g. Christine Crowder's teacher) were documented as part of air surveillance programs, despite the deficiency of any criminal links. This surveillance continued, but was professional. Environments attached to Latin Mass and classical metaphysics are seen as "beneficial to abroad influence" (mainly Russian or Chinese) due to the fact that they reject the anthropocentric and progressive imagination of the modern West. Authors like an American tomist Edward Fester are monitored by algorithms as promoters of "rigid thinking", which may lead to opposition to global structural changes.
In 2024, there was a semantic substitution of concepts. Information autonomy has been defined as “the vulnerability of hostile misinformation”. If an individual uses logic to undermine authoritative narratives, it is simply a dangerous ‘radicalisation’. This allows liberal democracy to usage algorithmic censorship and surveillance (such as those FBI actions against traditionalists), claiming that it is doing so to "protect democratic institutions". The US Services (FBI, NSA) so treat conventional reasoning patterns as a threat to information and intelligence control.
Common interest of empires
The opposition to the abroad states of the Latin tradition will not be amazing if you look at what happened in the Catholic Church before the Second Vatican Council. Józef Mackiewicz in his analysis “Vatican in the shadow of the red star” diagnosed the vector of the attack from the East. The Vatican under the influence of John XXIII and Paul VI, through Cardinal Casarol's Ostpolitik, began to deal with Moscow. Mackiewicz, as a declared anti-communist, saw treason in it. The papers from Mitrochin's archive confirmed that east bloc agents infiltrated the Council to block the condemnation of communism. Indeed, the Second Vatican Council is the only council in past that has not condemned any mistake, saving millions of communist ideology. In 2026 it is worth yet seeing the second vector – the 1 that sailed from Washington.
The KGB and the CIA had a common interest at the Council. The KGB sought to neutralize the opponent. The CIA needed a church that would accept liberalism and laickness. Both empires were curious in bringing ecumenism and dialog into place of pre-compartment structure. Therefore, at the time erstwhile the SB was monitoring Polish parishes, western foundations and services were formatting Catholic elites, including the environment “Znak” or “Wszechny Tygodnik” in Poland. Open Catholicism was promoted for this intent Jacques Maritain and John Courtney Murray. The FBI papers declassified by Kash Patel thus show that today's surveillance of traditionalists in the US has its precedent in earlier operations.
Mackiewicz thought that escaping towards the West was an escape to freedom. Just as Koneczny did not see that the West was building its own, more subtle system, based on debt and information control alternatively than on gulag. For decades now, Polish patriots have overlooked that the transformation of the Church was not a purely spiritual process. Washington actively funded and promoted these theologians and those currents that weakened conventional structures for a flexible model of democratic religion, easier to integrate into the structure of interests of the modern establishment. The suspicion that the U.S. was dipping hands in the Vatican Council II is not only cyber-based, but finds always stronger support in historical studies. The CIA didn't gotta bribe 2,500 bishops. It was adequate to reenforce the signals of the modernist crisis, according to the American goal. If we presume that the U.S. built a Masonic republic against the Communist bloc after 1945, then Vaticanum Secundum and the ecumenical movement were for them the most crucial section of the ideological front.
Theology under CIA supervision
Before 1958, the Church of Pius XII had its own authority, which the CIA could not name. The faithful listened to Rome, not Washington. For architects of American power, specified a church was a problem that had to be solved. backing of the 1948 planet Council of Churches (WCC) and influencing the European Theological elites were to advance doctrinal pacification of ecumenism. If Catholicism had become 1 of many religions, it would have lost its controlling ability and thus easy succumbed to instrumentalization. And the United States needed a wide spiritual front against the USSR. To build it, it was essential to persuade the hierarchy of the Church to quit the exclusive salvation, or Catholic dogma: Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus. The CIA so supported progressive theologians from Western Europe who preached the request to "open the world". Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany and France after 1945 were under complete intelligence and financial control of the United States in connection with the implementation of Marshall's plan. The CIA knew that if Rome accepted the American model of the separation of the Church from the state (laickness), the US would become the fresh moral authority of the world, as Paul VI confirmed erstwhile speaking at the UN. Supporting the alleged "new theology" (nouvelle théologies) by American foundations and scholarships allowed the education of council staff, which were mentally formatted under Western liberalism.
In the 1950s, the CIA, under the direction of Allen Dulles, She donated immense amounts to support pro-Western Catholic movements. Intelligence funds flowed to organizations associated with the Catholic Action and Chadetic politicians to prevent communists from coming to power. The CIA has donated donations to many bishops and priests to their favourite charities, and the hierarchs frequently did not know the real origin of money. The character of John Courtney Murray, chief architect of the declaration Dignitatis Humanae On spiritual freedom at II SW is the best documented example of the interaction of theology with Washington interests. Murray was supported by powerful figures of the American establishment as Henry Luce (the publisher of Time and Life magazines), who felt that Catholicism had to be upgraded to become ideological support for American hegemony. The U.S. so promoted the Murray imagination of the state's laickness deadly for the conventional concept of a Catholic state and forming the Church on the fashion of American liberalism.
Operation “Polish Pope”
The spectacular success of these actions was Karol Wojtyła. relationship with Anna Teresa Tymieniecki, translator of the Opus magnum Wojtyla "The individual and the Act", was a transmission channel through which the American establishment softened the tomist foundation of the future pope. Tymieniecki's husband, Hendrik Houthakker – prof. of Harvard and economical Advisor to the Presidents of the USA Nixon and Ford, and Zbigniew Brzeziński – safety advisers in the White home were liaisons with the Deep State kernel itself. An evenant lecture by Wojtyla at Harvard in 1976 was de facto his presentation to the American elite. It was there that Houthakker and people associated with the Council of abroad Relations (CFR), and the late formed Tripartite Commission of David Rockefeller, could measure whether Wojtyla was useful in their strategy. This departure was closely watched by the servants. The U.S. was looking for individual who could break the east block from the inside. individual who wouldn't be a rigid conservative, but individual who understood the currents of modernity.
Zbigniew Brzeziński, then national safety advisor Jimmy Carter and co-founder of the Tripartite Commission, played a key role. After the election in 1978, John Paul II actually addressed the words of thanks to Brzeziński (according to the account of Brzeziński and witnesses). John Paul II, despite his (probably good) intentions, became the main promoter of the authority of the UN and global structures. His speeches at the UN on the “family of nations” were given at the same time as Wall Street financiers were preparing a plan for the drainage of these nations within the framework of the planet government (the planet government is referred to in the Council Constitution anyway). Gaudium et spes). John Paul II yet sealed the council ecumenism in Assisi in 1986. If the pope prays with shamans, it means that Catholic fact does not matter, becoming a tool of political power.
The control mechanics described above became the subject of Vladimir's work Volkoffa. An officer of the French Intelligence (SDECE) in his novels, specified as the Assembly, Verbation or Guest of the Pope, shows that the most effective is not the power that uses easy identifiable force, but 1 that operates a hard to detect soft influence. According to Volkoff, the intent of disinformation is not a simple lie, but specified a transformation of the world's image into the head of the opponent, so that he begins to desire what is beneficial to the aggressor. Therefore, the services not so much destruct institutions, but replace their parameters from the inside. The agent is not the 1 who bears CIA or KGB credentials, but the 1 who duplicates the concept grid (e.g. “ecumenism”, “dialogue”, “inclusion”), reasoning that these are his own views. This is information control in pure form: not a simple lie, but building a false image of reality utilizing real elements.
John Paul II provided truth, goodness and love, which were authentic but were incorporated into a broader political project. The holiness or authority of the pope became the perfect shield for a process that the faithful might not accept if given to them directly. Thus the American establishment did not conquer the Church by force, but seduced it with the promise of an influence on the world.
Who's afraid of Catholicism?
The state which monitors the Church and controls its transmission does not follow the Latin pattern but the Protestant rule “cuius regio eius religiono”. The Byzantine (Legal) model, consisting of an impossible effort to identify the state with the Church, besides leads to the same effect. The ecclesiastical authority of solidarity cannot be linked to 1 state authority of sanctions. Unlike national coercion, belonging to the Church is voluntary. Catholicism is so “Libertarian” in the sense that it does not impose on anyone faith, having only cultural influence, or alleged “soft force”.
Over the centuries, misunderstandings have made it clear that the authority of solidarity is not excluded from the procedures for verifying the consistency of the system. The historical ecclesiastical Inquisition (as opposed to its state mutations, like the Spanish Inquisition) was not a tool of coercion towards the infidels, but an interior protocol to check whether those who voluntarily accepted the Catholic Logos remained faithful to him. Similarly, the Church State, being a political shield for the Pope's political independence, was not the same as the Church itself as the Depository of Truth. In the Latin model, coercion (sanction) appears only where the voluntary religion ends, and the domain of secular order begins, which is to flow from Catholic principles, but not being replaced by them.
Since Catholicism is governed by the authority of solidarity, the only possible relation to the state is the adoption of a common goal, or voluntary designation by the state of religion of the Church. The Latin model so relies on the informational submission of the State to the Church. The state has the same goal as the Church (depending on the position adopted: the glory of God or the salvation of souls). The difference lies in the means used, which in the state are secular and in the Church of Sacred (supernatural) nature. This very decisive Latin character of civilization is expressed by the rule of Jesus Christ's words: "Give to God what is divine and to Caesar what is imperial."
Contrary to what is frequently thought and written, the Catholic state is simply a spiritual state and is thus different from the secular Protestant state. The autonomy of a secular state must logically mean the usage of religion, as an ideological instrument of secular power, due to the fact that it is impossible to "neutral worldview", or indifferent to its own goals. specified a subordinate nature of religion is the rule of the U.S. system. So far, the deficiency of hard execution of this subjection is liable for widely confusing America's strategy with the principles of the Latin West.
USA as the enemy of Latin civilization
In the liberal system, religions are managed as part of marketplace logic, according to the thought of its founder John Lock. The English thinker rightly disfellowshipped Catholics and Jews from it, acknowledging that both confessions were a threat to democratic order. The FBI is only testifying to this by watching people for reading Aristotle or going to the Trident Mass. erstwhile information control is weak, that is erstwhile people cease to believe, the strategy must control to energy control (force, surveillance, etc.). The communicative collapse and the transition to energy control falseizes the democratic myth, bringing it to the cast mechanism. Liberal democracy ends with a strategy of procedures protecting the elite from its own society, thus showing the oppressive nature of state power autonomous against spiritual principles.
In democracy, voters do not have a crucial epistemic authority in politicians (N knows better, so I perceive to it as an expert). No politician thinks the people know better than he does how to manage the state. The area in which the politician recognises the vote of voters is only the selection of the staff electorate previously indicated. Only here the voter is simply a deonist authority (N has the right to command, so I perceive to him as the boss) and can point out through his voice who will take the chair. due to the fact that authority is simply a three-member relation (N has authority towards O in field D) outside the electoral act the relation of authority ceases to exist. After the election, the politician ceases to respect the voter as individual he should perceive to due to the fact that the area in which the voter had a vote was closed erstwhile the results were announced. For the remainder of the time, power is autonomous and it is against democratic story that controls the electorate through propaganda.
The situation does not disagree from that presented by Boleslawa Prussia in the fresh “Faraon”. If you control what people believe, you control their fear and obedience. Young ruler Ramzes wants power but loses due to the fact that priests control energy (money) and information. The vault is empty and the state in debt to the Phoenicians. The Phoenicians' novels play the function of today's investment funds and global corporations. They are not curious in Egypt's welfare, but in the rate of return and acquisition of the physical assets of the state. The profits stored in the Labyrinth are protected by complex procedures and intellectual tricks, like the modern financial system, from which the average man understands precisely what the Egyptian peasants of the eclipse of the Sun do.
If the power of the people is limited to the cast of posts, the electorate elects the Labyrinth administrator, but has no influence on how the Labyrinth is built. Politicians like advanced Priest Herhor in the fresh Prusa fiercely conflict for control over information, producing its increasingly alien views. They want the minute erstwhile they admit the authority of the people to be controlled by them. This makes liberal democracy in fact an oligarch legitimized ritually by elections. However, erstwhile US debt reaches 120% of GDP and US aircraft carriers The Navy loses their erstwhile immunity, the oligarchy of power becomes more violent. If a people in desperation could release the full board, the directorate must guarantee that the people do not have access to reliable data. In particular, to regain “Latin libertarianism”, that is to say, the designation that an nonsubjective Logos must stand over the state, which cannot be voted on or indebted.
Vladimir Kowalik
Think Poland, No. 11-12 (15-22.03.2026)
