reprint
Small talk is not their favourite activity.
Aleksandra Urbaniak
16 December 2025
Eleanor Roosevelt erstwhile said: “Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds – about events. tiny minds – about people.” reflection of the celebrated activist and diplomat confirms intellectual research. Rumors about others are a feature of the least volatile people, due to the fact that they do not lead to any crucial discoveries or interesting, deeper conclusions. Of course, everyone will get to talk about someone, but if we can't find any another common topics too talking about others – let's not imagine that we'll have a chance to talk intelligently with them.
What does intelligent conversation mean? It's a conversation where common reflection is just the starting point of a more complex reflection. It provokes both interlocutors to ask complex questions about the meaning, causes and mechanisms of certain phenomena – leading them besides to reality.
Naturally not all conversation can (and should) be so deep. Most of our communication has a purely applicable dimension or concerns our private affairs. However, erstwhile we are in any company, and the atmosphere is conducive to a longer, free discussion, then it is easy to see who is heading towards more abstract, complex ideas – and who is left with gossip, who has quarreled with whom, got married, or what they wear.
1. doctrine and Abstract Ideas
Psychologist Howard Gardner, who coined the explanation of respective types of intelligence, observed that intelligent minds tend to think abstractly. They can not only evidence facts, but go on and ask questions: “Why?”, “why?”, “how does it work?”. They do not halt at apparent constatations, but are curious in uncovering meaning in the chaos of reality.
2. individual development
Another feature attributed to intelligent people is [...] the ability to understand, monitor and control their own cognitive processes, specified as memory, attention or problem solving. A man endowed with intelligence does not focus only on judging others, but is curious about his own learning mechanisms and wants to actively improve them.
3. Future scenarios
A deeper reflection on the nature of observed phenomena is more likely to prompt intelligent persons to make theories about the future. They can foretell the far - reaching consequences of actions that most people do not even think about.
4. Psychology and Sociology
It is besides hard for intelligent people to escape the question of human nature. Seeing how conflicting our actions are and how easy we fall into traps of limited perception, they may more gladly discuss social and intellectual mechanisms that form human attitudes or views. Even if they do not straight usage ... specialized terms in the field of psychology, they can intuitively scope them in the course of conversation or self-reflection.
5. Cultural texts and their importance
One of the distinctions of intelligence is besides the way we consume the content of culture. To some, it is only utilized to “whisper” or is simply a form of escapism – they want to cut off from the grey reality for a while and plunge into the fantasy world. specified people will choose alternatively films, series, and books with uncomplicated plots, filled with sensations, twists or heart attacks.
Marcin Rotkiewicz
December 18, 2025
Traditional intellectual theories (or models) of improvement item the importance of congenital talent or a immense amount of specialized training initiated as early as possible. The work of researchers from Germany and the USA, published in Science, shows this from a different perspective. Researchers collected data from 19 large collections covering nearly 35,000 people successful in various fields, including science, music, sports and chess. They then compared them with the results of 66 studies on young talent to see if the large results in childhood truly foretell success in adulthood.
It turned out that outstanding juniors and world-class adults are 2 almost distinct populations that follow completely different paths of development. For example, the first 10 best chess players in youth and later the first 10 adult grandmasters are almost 90 percent completely different people. A akin trend, reaching almost 90% of divergences, was observed among leading athletes. Moreover, most Nobel laureates or excellent musicians did not stand out for outstanding achievements at the early phase of education, and frequently achieved results weaker than many of their peers.
The key difference between these groups lies in the training structure. Young recordrs usually specialize early in 1 field, train intensely and evidence fast progress.
Marcin Rotkiewicz
By education, writer (pulsar and weekly POLITYKA) and philosopher, scholarship holder Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Author of Rivers Interviews: with prof. Jerzy Vetulani on “The Brain and the Fool” and with prof. Bogdan Wojciszke on “Homo not rather sapiens”. He besides wrote “In the kingdom of the Monsathan. GMO, gluten and vaccines”, for which he received the Smart Books portal editors award.
16 December 2025
Eleanor Roosevelt erstwhile said: “Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds – about events. tiny minds – about people.” reflection of the celebrated activist and diplomat confirms intellectual research. Rumors about others are a feature of the least volatile people, due to the fact that they do not lead to any crucial discoveries or interesting, deeper conclusions. Of course, everyone will get to talk about someone, but if we can't find any another common topics too talking about others – let's not imagine that we'll have a chance to talk intelligently with them.
What does intelligent conversation mean? It's a conversation where common reflection is just the starting point of a more complex reflection. It provokes both interlocutors to ask complex questions about the meaning, causes and mechanisms of certain phenomena – leading them besides to reality.
Naturally not all conversation can (and should) be so deep. Most of our communication has a purely applicable dimension or concerns our private affairs. However, erstwhile we are in any company, and the atmosphere is conducive to a longer, free discussion, then it is easy to see who is heading towards more abstract, complex ideas – and who is left with gossip, who has quarreled with whom, got married, or what they wear.
1. doctrine and Abstract Ideas
Psychologist Howard Gardner, who coined the explanation of respective types of intelligence, observed that intelligent minds tend to think abstractly. They can not only evidence facts, but go on and ask questions: “Why?”, “why?”, “how does it work?”. They do not halt at apparent constatations, but are curious in uncovering meaning in the chaos of reality.
2. individual development
Another feature attributed to intelligent people is [...] the ability to understand, monitor and control their own cognitive processes, specified as memory, attention or problem solving. A man endowed with intelligence does not focus only on judging others, but is curious about his own learning mechanisms and wants to actively improve them.
3. Future scenarios
A deeper reflection on the nature of observed phenomena is more likely to prompt intelligent persons to make theories about the future. They can foretell the far - reaching consequences of actions that most people do not even think about.
4. Psychology and Sociology
It is besides hard for intelligent people to escape the question of human nature. Seeing how conflicting our actions are and how easy we fall into traps of limited perception, they may more gladly discuss social and intellectual mechanisms that form human attitudes or views. Even if they do not straight usage ... specialized terms in the field of psychology, they can intuitively scope them in the course of conversation or self-reflection.
5. Cultural texts and their importance
One of the distinctions of intelligence is besides the way we consume the content of culture. To some, it is only utilized to “whisper” or is simply a form of escapism – they want to cut off from the grey reality for a while and plunge into the fantasy world. specified people will choose alternatively films, series, and books with uncomplicated plots, filled with sensations, twists or heart attacks.
Smart people can besides treat amusement culture, but they besides like it erstwhile it presents them with any intellectual challenge and encourages them to meditate.
The full here:
słubiedlo.pl/psychology/554786,1,5-themes-to-talk-which-chosen-people-intelligent.read
-------------
Miracle children seldom grow up to be champions. Possible 3 reasons
Analysis of careers of tens of thousands of outstanding individuals – from Nobel Prize winners to Olympic champions – indicates that the road to the top does not lead through early specialisation.
The full here:
słubiedlo.pl/psychology/554786,1,5-themes-to-talk-which-chosen-people-intelligent.read
-------------
Miracle children seldom grow up to be champions. Possible 3 reasons
Analysis of careers of tens of thousands of outstanding individuals – from Nobel Prize winners to Olympic champions – indicates that the road to the top does not lead through early specialisation.
Marcin Rotkiewicz
December 18, 2025
Traditional intellectual theories (or models) of improvement item the importance of congenital talent or a immense amount of specialized training initiated as early as possible. The work of researchers from Germany and the USA, published in Science, shows this from a different perspective. Researchers collected data from 19 large collections covering nearly 35,000 people successful in various fields, including science, music, sports and chess. They then compared them with the results of 66 studies on young talent to see if the large results in childhood truly foretell success in adulthood.
It turned out that outstanding juniors and world-class adults are 2 almost distinct populations that follow completely different paths of development. For example, the first 10 best chess players in youth and later the first 10 adult grandmasters are almost 90 percent completely different people. A akin trend, reaching almost 90% of divergences, was observed among leading athletes. Moreover, most Nobel laureates or excellent musicians did not stand out for outstanding achievements at the early phase of education, and frequently achieved results weaker than many of their peers.
The key difference between these groups lies in the training structure. Young recordrs usually specialize early in 1 field, train intensely and evidence fast progress.
The future adult elite follows the way of "sustainable development", achieving a advanced level of skills slower and without focusing on 1 field, athletics or instrument. This pattern is repeated in different domains, suggesting the existence of universal rules for acquiring the highest competences.
The authors of the publication propose 3 hypotheses explaining this pattern:
The authors of the publication propose 3 hypotheses explaining this pattern:
- gaining experience in various fields increases the chance of uncovering an optimal match to your own talents;
- diverse practices make cognitive flexibility and learning capacity;
- avoiding early specialization reduces the hazard of burning or injury
Marcin Rotkiewicz
By education, writer (pulsar and weekly POLITYKA) and philosopher, scholarship holder Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Author of Rivers Interviews: with prof. Jerzy Vetulani on “The Brain and the Fool” and with prof. Bogdan Wojciszke on “Homo not rather sapiens”. He besides wrote “In the kingdom of the Monsathan. GMO, gluten and vaccines”, for which he received the Smart Books portal editors award.
pulsar.pl project/a associate of 2326565,1, wonderful-children-rare-rises- on-masters- possible-three-reasons.read
