The conflict in Ukraine, which began with Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022, has evolved into a protracted war with far-reaching geopolitical implications. Looking towards 2025, the alliance between Russia, China, Iran and North Korea is not only strengthening its geopolitical clout but besides posing a direct threat to both European safety and regional stability. It forms a formidable challenge not just for Ukraine but for the European continent and the broader global order. As the conflict continues, it has become clear that Russia’s ambitions extend beyond its borders, seeking to reshape the geopolitical scenery in ways that could undermine Europe’s established safety architecture.
January 2024 was marked by rocket attacks on Ukraine’s largest cities, Kyiv and Kharkiv, resulting in at least 130 injuries and 18 fatalities. What truly distinguished both these assaults was the diverse arsenal employed by Russia, which included missiles from North Korea, drones from Iran, and technology from China. The end of 2024 saw a crucial rocket strike on the Ukrainian city of Dnipro, utilizing a fresh “experimental” kind of rocket technology. This missile, referred to as “Oreshnik” by Russian president Vladimir Putin, is described as a medium-range ballistic rocket equipped with a non-nuclear hypersonic warhead. It is capable of carrying multiple warheads to mark multiple locations simultaneously. The missile’s advanced features, including its hypersonic velocity and multiple warhead capability, make it a crucial threat to existing rocket defence systems. Its intermediate scope means that it can besides strike well beyond the territory of Ukraine.
For Europe, the improvement of Oreshnik is peculiarly alarming, as its scope and precision mean that key parts of the continent – including critical infrastructure and military installations – could rapidly become susceptible if the conflict were to spill over. And, erstwhile again, the creation of “Oreshnik” was possible thanks to the collaboration with China, Iran and North Korea. Each country has played a distinct function in supporting Russia’s rocket capabilities, either straight or indirectly.
Since the beginning of the conflict, Russia’s military capabilities have advanced significantly, with the country now producing about 330 drones each month. Furthermore, Russia is collaborating with Iran to establish a drone manufacturing facility on its territory, which is expected to enhance production further. In addition, North Korea has been supplying Russia with artillery shells, delivering about 5 million so far as Ukraine’s own stockpiles dwindle. China has besides become Russia’s main economical partner, increasing its imports of Russian oil and gas while supplying a wide array of military technology. This partnership has allowed Russia to circumvent western sanctions and sustain its economical stableness amid global isolation. In turn, Europe’s stableness is straight impacted, as any bolstering of Russian capabilities along its east periphery raises the stakes for regional security.
Since 2022, the ties between Russia, China, Iran and North Korea have strengthened considerably as these nations aim to make an alternate to the existing global order. Despite their distinct ideologies and governance structures, their collective efforts pose a crucial challenge to global planet order as we know it. Recent news reports indicate that North Korean soldiers are undergoing training in Russia, with estimates suggesting that around 10,000 troops are joining Russian military operations in Ukraine. This only further complicates the geopolitical landscape. Their collective efforts now pose a crucial challenge to Europe’s safety and strategical autonomy, forcing European policymakers to re-examine their defence and diplomatic priorities.
Furthermore, the BRICS summit, which brought together leaders from various nations in the Global South, illustrates a crucial shift towards multilateralism aimed at countering western, and more specifically US, dominance in global affairs. At this year’s summit, Russian president Vladimir Putin talked extensively about the creation of the BRICS banknote. However, he tempered earlier aggressive calls for de-dollarization by indicating that the goal of BRICS associate nations is not to decision distant from the US dollar-dominated SWIFT platform. Instead, he emphasized the importance of deterring the “weaponization” of the US dollar by developing alternate systems for utilizing local currencies in financial transactions among BRICS countries and with their trading partners. For Europe, these moves could not only restructure global economical alliances but besides put force on its own financial mechanisms, possibly undermining economical stableness and integration with global markets.
Despite historical rivalries and existing tensions among the countries of the alliance, their shared opposition to western influence has fostered a partnership that has the possible to redefine existing global power structures. The proposed BRICS currency could enable these nations to assert their economical independency while competing with the current global financial system, which is mostly dominated by the US dollar. After all, it accounts for about 90 per cent of all currency trading. Until recently, nearly 100 per cent of oil trading was conducted in US dollars. However, in 2023, about one-fifth of oil trades were reportedly made utilizing another currencies. This collaboration extends well beyond military alliances; it includes robust economical and technological exchanges that could effectively undermine western strategies and initiatives.
Recent political developments in Washington have added another layer of complexity to this evolving landscape. The fresh change in the US administration has signalled a possible recalibration of American abroad policy priorities. any observers note that the fresh leadership is adopting a more nuanced stance toward Russia’s communicative on the war in Ukraine, a shift that many fear may lend an implicit legitimacy to Russia’s actions. This could thereby undermine longstanding western support for Ukraine.
In this fresh era marked by the unpredictability of hegemonic power dynamics, the rapidly deepening alliance among Russia, China, Iran and North Korea poses an even greater challenge. Their seamless cooperation and fast technological advancements – exemplified by innovations like Oreshnik – are rapidly transforming them into a formidable counterweight to NATO. Analysts inform that if the United States decides to scale back its conventional commitments to European security, Europe could be left highly susceptible to renewed conflict or even occupation as these adversarial powers seize the strategical opportunity.
Geopolitically, this emerging alliance poses formidable challenges – especially for Europe, whose safety and stableness have long been underpinned by a delicate balance of power in the region. The interdependence of these nations enables them to coordinate actions and responses, thereby complicating European defence planning and diplomatic initiatives on multiple fronts. As these countries prosecute both individual and collective interests, the hazard of spillover conflicts increases, possibly stretching Europe’s military resources and destabilizing neighbouring regions. Ukraine serves as a prime example of this alliance reshaping regional dynamics, with profound implications for European security.
The evolving relationships among Russia, China, Iran and North Korea signify a profound transformation in global relations, representing efforts that could straight undermine Europe’s longstanding safety frameworks and organization stability. Failing to address these developments would be a grave mistake for European leadership. This alliance is poised to alter both military and economical power balances in ways that could leave Europe increasingly exposed to instability.
The challenges posed by this evolving alliance should be confronted with a clear set of policy recommendations. European policymakers must adopt a comprehensive strategy that prioritizes diplomatic, economical and multilateral initiatives while besides bolstering independent defence capabilities. The key to this approach is strengthening existing partnerships – specified as NATO – while simultaneously developing fresh frameworks centred on economical and technological cooperation, ensuring that Europe’s sovereignty and strategical interests are proactively protected. In addition, Europe should invest in robust cyber capabilities and soft power initiatives to counter hybrid threats and safe regional stability.
Europe now stands at a critical juncture. With advanced systems like Oreshnik demonstrating that Russia and its allies are rapidly expanding their military capabilities, European safety can no longer trust on outdated paradigms. The continent must rapidly modernize its armed forces and defence infrastructure by importantly expanding defence spending to support the improvement and acquisition of cutting-edge military technologies and integrated rocket defence systems capable of neutralizing advanced threats. Strengthening NATO’s collective capabilities is imperative, as European nations request to deepen military cooperation; enhance force readiness through faster mobilization and streamlined command structures; and conduct comprehensive joint training exercises. A unified and robust military deterrence strategy must be established through improved intelligence sharing, the repositioning of critical military assets in susceptible regions, and a resolute commitment to border defence.
Europe’s ability to keep safety in an era marked by heightened unpredictability and aggressive military posturing depends on its capacity to pivot from passive reliance on conventional measures to decisive, forceful military action, making immediate and unequivocal military improvement an urgent necessity. Although Europe has traditionally thrived as an economy-driven union, the time has arrived now for it to step forward as a military power as well.
Maryna Venneri is simply a Ukrainian freelance author and policy analyst specializing in east European affairs and civilian war studies. She is simply a erstwhile fellow of the mediate East Institute’s Frontier Europe Initiative, focusing on Black Sea security, and presently works as a elder improvement Associate at JA Europe, Europe’s leader in entrepreneurship, work readiness and financial wellness programmes for youth.
Please support New east Europe's crowdfunding campaign. Donate by clicking on the button below.
