Two weeks ago, she said no. “Something has happened”

This is an highly hard situation to defend. Health Minister Isabella Leszczyna 2 weeks ago publically assured that she would not support the wellness contribution simplification project. And she was very convincing and firm about it.

Can NFZ handle this? “Surely not,” said the Minister of Health, asked about the issue of the task by journalists.

– I realize there is simply a coalition agreement and the coalition government is simply a truly demanding and hard government. But the Minister of wellness cannot accept a simplification in the wellness contribution, due to the fact that we have more and more needs – emphasized Isabella Leschina in a conversation with marketzdrowia.pl.

Health contribution 2025. Minister of wellness for Lowering

What's more, stressed that no wellness minister could accept a simplification in the wellness contribution. erstwhile asked how she would respond erstwhile voting on the matter, she replied: " I'm surely not voting for a simplification in the contribution. Health.

It has been 2 weeks and there has been a vote in the Sejm to reduce the wellness contribution for entrepreneurs. Isabella Leschina voted precisely as the full club of the Civic Coalition. She was all for it.

In another words: Minister of wellness was in favour of reducing the wellness contribution, although a minute earlier, she had promised that she would not vote that way.

Health contribution. Necessary: We had a common position

As we learn, the position of Leschina was clear. She argued that she would not support the simplification of the wellness contribution not only in talks with journalists but besides her closest colleagues. Including Deputy Minister for wellness Wojciech Konieczny.

– When I spoke to the Minister, we had a common position. – says Interia Deputy Minister of Health.

– seemingly something's happened in fresh days.But you gotta ask the minister. I know nothing about the reasons for this change – he adds.

– I'm a wellness minister, and I'm liable for keeping the NFZ from getting hurt. The Minister of Finance and the Prime Minister have undertaken to fill this loss. I'm in this government, I'm the vice president of the PO, and Another vote would be a vote of distrust towards the Prime Minister – she said after the vote Leschina.

Health premium reduced. ‘Step in the other direction’

Wojciech Necessary in government represents the Left. It's the members of this club who most publically appealed to the Sejm about patients. Twice from the Parliamentary Speaker The organization MP Marcelina Zawisza appealed to another groups for ‘remembering’.

Left and Together were opposed to reducing wellness contributions. Similarly, the PiS club voted. 25 Members abstained: 12 from the Confederacy, 7 from the PiS, 1 from the KO, 3 from the Republican ellipse and 2 non-attached.

How does Deputy Minister of wellness Wojciech Konieczny measure the result of this vote?

– It can't be good under these conditions. Money in the strategy is missing. The contributions that are are not at specified a level as to guarantee that the strategy works well. The Ministry of Finance declares that it will fill this loss, but This is not about filling the gaps, but about expanding backing to the EU average. And we're sending a signal that it's not necessary.to rise contributions, increase funding. That's a very bad signal – he evaluates Necessity.

- That's it. a signal that cuts the wings of those who care about patients, shortening queues, improving conditions, expanding hospitals. This is simply a step in the other direction that all of Europe is reasoning about how to increase backing for wellness care. If we had a budget with any large surpluses, we could think about it, but now we know that This will affect the large savings in wellness care. They will most likely be forced by those who will supplement the failure of this contribution," stresses Senator Necessary.

Health contribution 2025. ‘It was possible to reject this project’

Interestingly, The bill could have been rejected if all Members who abstained had voted against. 213 parliamentarians voted in favour of reducing the wellness contribution, and 190 were against. Twenty-five people stopped.

– This task could have been rejected. It wasn't about 230 votes. It is simply a signal that our work, the work of the Left worked and that is simply a large success. Sorry. The Confederacy helped push this task through.. The Confederacy's assistance “for the sake of Polish patients” was essential to vote on this law. Well, that's what happened. We have the Senate, we have the President, so we'll see how this ends. – the Deputy Minister essential wonders.

Luke Spitter