Tusk versus PiS. safety as a subject for meaningless insults

On both sides of the dispute are the strongest words, accusations of “honor” and “fail”. And the canonade was the first to enter the current government coalition. erstwhile MEPs PiS and Confederations voted against the resolution European Parliament defence, Prime Minister Donald Tusk He immediately accused the right-wing opposition that “she was against the Shield of the East”. He utilized the word "disgrace" and has since consistently utilized it.

In fact, this programme to strengthen the east Polish border (and besides European Union) was added as an amendment to the 15th point of resolution, without any specifics, along with the Baltic Line of Defence. In fact, these names have only been utilized as examples. The points were 89. For the opposition, at least any of them are a deprivation program Poland Sovereignty in Defence Affairs.

Shield East. War on Invections

Tusk has just called for a consensus on defence. Now there is no slightest effort to talk to the opposition in order to bring their positions at least closer. Leaving for Brussels to the Defence Summit, Tusk requested the opposition to “wash off its shame” and support the Polish resolution Parliament. It, in turn, records the unconditional support of the EP resolution at the outset. The opposition in this form put against the wall had no election. She again voted no.

Comments are a parody of discussion on the most key issues of global policy. And evidence to the political level of the staff. associate KOWitold Zembaczyński appeared at the press conference of PiS parliamentarians with the banner “PiS, Confederation = Russia‘.

The subject serves to put the opposition on the head – we have a presidential run in the background.

The Law and Justice said, on the another hand, that he was willing to vote in favour of the Resolution of the GO, if there was a declaration of support for the EP resolution. In the text there were undisputed announcements of strengthening their own defence policy, including the Shield of the East again.

The majority of the government refused to support specified a correction. It can be lamented that the PiS MPs were harassing the Polish defence minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamisha ‘To Berlin!’. He didn't deserve this. But the opposition besides did not deserve his militant cries, denying her patriotism.

Defense dispute. Centralisation

There were so many points in the EP resolution due to the fact that it supposedly includes a programme to strengthen defence capabilities Europe, together with an appeal to European Commissionto make this programme in the form of the White Book.

"The Union must act immediately to guarantee its own autonomous security," we read. And then, “or the Union states will join forces and act together... or stay alone and put at hazard by aggressive enemies and unpredictable partners.”

The text does not hide that the Union considers specified an unpredictable partner USA Under Government Donald Trumpto whom the vote was mentioned in UN in defence of Russia. The same resolution explicitly recognises Russia as a possible aggressor towards Europe as a whole. There are besides strong military aid announcements for Ukraine (wherein it is not known why any have not yet been realised, even though the usage of frozen Russian assets has been made).

The PiS and the Confederacy considered that a imagination of the centralisation of the Union was materialised in the wake of a Russian threat. The announcements of coordination of defence policies, including joint purchases of equipment and preferences for European products, are recorded in many points. And point 66 announces the creation of the Council of Defence Ministers. And moving distant from the rule of unanimity on defence issues.

In fact, following specified a decision, Poland's autonomy would be limited. In view of the EU's long-standing quacking towards Russia, it is hard not to consider this as at least a risk. At the same time, this would be a step towards treating the Union as a superstate with its own “European army”.

Although it has not been written straight and we do not know erstwhile and what the next steps will be.

The Truism is to remind you that bodily changes would be permanent. For this determination Germany is France to have a tough policy towards Russia is something uncertain, elusive. For apparent reasons, Europe's remilitarisation programme must be set up for many years.

The Polish right, mainly the Law and Justice, is protesting that it is besides an effort to make structures and procedures for safety competing with NATO. Her politicians repeat like a mantra the expression about "pudding Americans from Europe".

This shows a weakness in their position. After all, the EU elite did not invent Trump's signals: "defeat yourselves." any consequence from Brussels and European capitals is natural. This does not pass through the throat of the PiS people due to the fact that they cultivate the idealized Trump myth, ready to aid Poland. It is simply a product of their imaginations more than reality, although of course it is derived from the gestures of the American President. Gestures that cost nothing.

NATO versus the Union?

But if Jarosław Kaczyński He has weaker cards than his pathetic spells, what to say about Tusk's cards. He asks Poles to blindly trust the Union, which is said to have awakened suddenly. He signs the program not only infernoly risky, but above all inferno vague.

I'm afraid he doesn't know the answers to the questions himself. It replaces this ignorance with the overzealousness of the European Primus, which it uses for 1 thing: the permanent hammering of its opposition.

I am reading this European resolution and I am asking whom all these projects are addressed to? Point 10 refers to the name ‘European Defence Union’. What kind of being is that?

In point 42, we find a declaration of the meaning of the Union-NATO cooperation. But besides the call for a "European pillar of NATO". How can he be isolated? Not a word about that.

Or are there hidden plans, specified as the creation of a separate “European General Staff”? How will he fit into NATO structures? Or there's 1 large improvisation behind it and no 1 knows the answer yet. Should Poland be working in the dark, then?

Is EU bureaucracy the best contractor for war preparations? I urge Mark Cichocki's text in "Political Theology". He doesn't believe in the talent of this bureaucracy. It recommends simply trying to strengthen the military cooperation of European countries.

Of course Trump is besides enigma, unknown. Even in the case of Ukraine, he says something 1 day, the another denies himself, and in practice, with Putin's stubbornness it is little effective than the hope of the right hand, besides Polish. So we have a clash of 2 secrets. But I think it would be best to test his intentions.

Is his mystery adequate for Tusk to reheat for the 150th time the song about “the sold-out Russian PiS” (in 1 of the tweets he straight utilized specified an insult)? This is only a recipe for us to hatred ourselves more in Poland.

And whether we are dealing with a clash of 2 political thoughts, or 2 ritual, organization songs, in our relations with the outside world, they change nothing.

Peter Zaremba