Third anniversary of the TK judgment. Dr. M. Skwarzyński: “He stated something that for anyone who correctly and honestly interprets the Constitution, it is obvious”

marsz.info 1 year ago

22 October 2020 The Constitutional Tribunal ruled that killing the unborn in the event of severe and irreversible impairment of the kid or his incurable life-threatening illness is incompatible with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. It was a large day to win the civilization of life in our homeland!

The Constitutional Court's judgement is part of the permanent case law. As the guest of Radio Maryja and tv Trwam Dr. M. Skwarzyński, assistant prof. of the Department of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, pointed out:

Democratic states always focus on ensuring protection of the most susceptible actors in the country. He stated something that for anyone who correctly and honestly interprets the Constitution is obvious. I mean, if we presume that the conceived kid has rights, it is not the object of the law, it is the subject of the law, then we cannot sacrifice its existence for a value that is not at least equivalent.

The law of the stronger?

The guest of the “Unfinished Conversations” programme stated that the judgement of the Constitutional Tribunal of 22 October 2020 changed the situation in an absolute way as regards the alleged abortion performed on children of the sick In Poland it was on this basis that the most children were killed, mainly with Down syndrome. But not just that. another disadvantages were besides pretext, and not only those of a dense nature. In the list of abortion indications there were besides diseases that did not stand in the way of the baby being born, survived, and functioning, though with any dysfunctions. However, before the ruling 3 years ago, as the lawyer pointed out:

All categories are shallow to 1 bag, which says it is simply a hard case, it will require work from parents, it will require work from the state, so it may be easier to get free of it, due to the fact that for apparent reasons it cannot talk at this point. The Court gave the floor, i.e. on their side. If we make a country that does not stand for the weakest, we have no chance. They're always bigger business groups, they're always stronger, and they can do what they want with us..

There is no “right to abortion”!

Dr. Skwarzyński noted that many lies arise in the discussion about killing unborn children.

There's no specified thing as reproductive rights and abortion rights. This is 1 of the myths the Left uses very fashionablely. However, if you would read any documents, any case law of global bodies on human rights, it does not say that there is simply a right to abortion, on the contrary. For example, the European Court of Human Rights, which the Left so eagerly cites, in cases against Poland it clearly points out that it has no right to abortion.

However, groups of leftist, pro-abortional activists and a full array of lawyers who service not truth, but ideology, performs skillful manipulation.

If a kid conceived is simply a subject of law, and is, due to the fact that heirs in all legal order, it is, due to the fact that you cannot attack pregnant women, due to the fact that you violate the wellness of the mother, you violate the wellness of the kid and it is entitled to its health, then at the same time there can be no right to abortion said the guest of Radio Maryja and tv Trwam.

That's the choice.

The lawyer noted that “the full lie about abortion concerns that actual arguments are rejected”. besides the apparent ones about the beginning of human life, confirmed by science. In this way, the weakest who cannot stand up for themselves begin to be ignored.

We will either make a country that protects specified individuals or fights. It's a choice. In the abortion narrative, abortion is shallow to the kind of contraception. No 1 wants to show and make public, enter into a discussion that this is simply a legal entity. I don't want to show it. This does not want to present itself due to the fact that there is immense money behind it at the end – stressed Dr. Skwarzyński.

Not being able to rise a sick kid doesn't mean you gotta kill them. There are a number of solutions available in a situation where all female can benefit from a hard diagnosis. Indeed, the State should extend aid in this respect. But that's not all...

We request to be aware of something. Women who consider abortion as a regulation consider it by an irresponsible man that they have no support in the father of this child. You gotta name a thing. It is besides a scandal that the state does not work in this regard. No 1 can force anyone to love a kid or a woman, it's impossible, but you can and should be responsible. – summarized the Chair of Human Rights and Human Rights of KUL.

The Polish legislator could return to what he himself established 29 years ago – i.e. to the first wording of Article 1 of the 1993 household Planning Act. As the Ordo Iuris Institute recalls, in its first version, this law in Article 1 provided that “Every human being has a natural right to life since conception” (paragraph 1) and "Life and wellness of the kid from the minute of conception stay under the protection of the law" (paragraph 2). A clear view that a man “becomes” at the time of conception and from that point on he has the right to life and the right to the protection of this fundamental value could contribute to the conclusion of the current and unobserved dispute. Indeed, it comes down to the question of whether man is human.

Despite the judgement of the Constitutional Tribunal, the force of pro-abortion environments continues! In the Ministry of Health, a squad has been established to make guidelines for abortion! so Center for Life and Family sent appeal to the Minister of Health to take a firm stance to defend the unborn and to rise standards of care for mothers expecting a baby.

MZ/Radio Maryja, ordoiuris.pl

Pharmacological abortion in Poland. Catholic doctors request immediate action

Read Entire Article