I read it on 1 of the websites.
"It is clear that 3 strong leaders are increasing in Europe today.Macron, Starmer and our Tusk". The title is beautiful, unfortunately false. These are the 3 politicians who, incapable to cope with the problems they have in their own countries, are taking a step forward to be in European politics. This is only part of his achievements in "smiling Poland". French president Macron , by many Polish commentators considered to be a prominent strategist, fucked his accelerated parliamentary elections in 2024 . The establishment of a unchangeable government without a sanitary cordon of the National Unity proved impossible. The change in the Prime Minister did not improve the situation. Only in February was the budget for 2025 passed. The economy shrinks, debt rises, EUR 3.3 trillion in debt, unemployment in February was 3.2 million. An increase of over 400,000 a year. This is briefly the position of "strong leader" representing France. Macron's communicative of "ready to usage atomic weapons to defend his European partners" shows a failure of contact with reality. Our leader, an educated historian, most likely learned that Poland had a signed alliance agreement with France since 1921 supplemented by a military agreement in 1939. And what did the French help? Whoever thinks that, with 40 bombs, Macron will save Europe must be an idiot. The usage of atomic weapons is the beginning of the end of the world.
As Macron lost the election, Keir Starmer became Prime Minister of large Britain. He inherited what came out of Tusk from the European Union - large Britain.In not the best condition which continues. Unpopular decisions of the fresh Prime Minister,chaos caused by protests and a gathering of support after respective months of office from 60 to 33% . The situation is disastrous, GDP growth forecasts for this year have been reduced from 1.5% to 1%. 4% unemployment etc. For a fewer months in office of Prime Minister "success" in interior politics, they are alternatively poor.
These 3 politicians, delicately speaking the weak, want to lead Europe, proceed the lost war in Ukraine, compete on military issues with the US. They're only doing this due to the fact that the American president has a different opinion on this issue.
Who and on what basis will send "reinsurance forces" to Ukraine erstwhile those who intend to send them there give them to proceed the war. Have the leaders consulted with the president of the United States, the president of Russia or possibly the UN. Or that's just what they do to each another to show that they be in politics. Trump's gonna set them up anyway.
https://www.liil.eu/promujnotke
