Trump Administration monitor social media activity, utilizing a fresh definition of "anti-Semitism", which includes criticism of the State of Israel. The aim is to catch people with “extremistic views”.
Trump is introducing censorship. On 9 April this year, the United States Immigration and Citizenship Service (USCIS) announced that it had begun checking immigrant activity in social media for “anti-Semitism”. It is about extended efforts by the Trump administration to combat pro-Palestinian statements and accusing judaic people of war crimes and against humanity.
USCIS, subject to the Department of Homeland safety (DHS), has reported that it will start to take into account "anti-Semitic activity of foreigners in social media and physical harassment of judaic people as a basis for rejecting immigration applications". The bill is to affect immediately "foreigners applying for permanent resident status, abroad students and foreigners associated with educational institutions related to anti-Semitic activities".
"Anti-Semitic activities" refers to pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses, which were defined as anti-Jewish, even though judaic students and judaic organizations besides participated in the demonstrations.
In social media activity controls, the Trump administration is likely to usage the definition of “anti-Semitism”, which includes criticism of Israel as a state. In the 2019 Implementing Regulation referred to in the USCIS statement, president Trump ordered all national agencies to apply the definition of the anti-Semitism of the global Alliance for Holocaust Memory (IHRA) and to usage a list of examples of “modern anti-Semitism” of this organization in the enforcement of Title VI of the civilian Rights Act.
The fresh definition was promoted in 2018, at the conference of the European judaic legislature in Vienna, from which the study "An end of Antisemitism" was compiled. Scandalous content of the study He discussed in his paper: “Sages of Zion. fresh opening’Radosław Patlewicz.
Examples of ‘modern anti-Semitism’ given by IHRA include, among others, "Comparing Israel's modern policy to Nazi policy". They besides mention the application of alleged double standards to Israel through "required from him conduct which is neither expected nor requested from any another democratic state" and “refuting to the judaic people the right to self-determination” by ‘the claim that the existence of the State of Israel is simply a racist undertaking.’
Secretary DHS Kristi Noem is in favour of the definition of IHRA. Last year, erstwhile she was inactive politician of South Dakota, she signed a bill that required the definition of “anti-Semitism” according to the IHRA to be taken into account in investigations into attacks on Jews.
Critics of Trump's administration's statements noted that even if any social media activity was considered anti-Semitic according to the conventional definition of the word, it would proceed to be a protected message under the First Amendment.
"From now on, DHS has officially conducted a policy to monitor social media against 'anti-Semitic' sentiments and deport non-citizens" – wrote on X Jenin Younes, a civilian rights lawyer. "Remember that Trump's administration has redefined anti-Semitism to take account of Israel's criticism and Zionism, but nevertheless actual anti-Semitic statements, like racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, and Islamophobic statements, are protected under 1A" She added.
OUR COMMENTS: Are we amazed that Donald Trump, though fighting censorship in another fields, at the same time, as a faithful servant of criminal Zionism, introduces censorship of telling the fact about Jews and their shameful practices? NO, due to the fact that from the beginning we wrote that it would be a dark component of the fresh presidency in the US.
We besides recommend: English police and air force have suspended white reception. The nonsubjective of diversity
