However, if that truly is his concept of reality, then the Russians will be able to play with it like a puppet and present portraits for concessions. By the way, a Russian court sentenced 4 independent journalists to 5.5 years in prison a fewer days ago for criticizing the Kremlin. Why don't Trump or Vance forget about freedom of speech in Putin's Russia?
Trump's statements about who started the war will go to the annals as 1 of the biggest bullshit in history. It's not his war, it's Biden's war, it's expected to be "Biden and Volodymyr Zelenski did an absolutely horrible job, allowing this farce to happen." He besides added the allegation to the president of Ukraine that "there is no beginning of war with individual who is 20 times bigger." So the president of the United States repeats the lies of Russian propaganda. We already know for certain that Putin does not want this war to end and demands for Russia 5 Ukrainian regions, even those not yet captured by the Russians. Trump tells us that he set Putin a deadline to end the war, but did not give a circumstantial date. I'm certain he'll put it down. ad Kalendas Graecas, or holy never, due to the fact that his past origin is nothing, and Putin plays his tunes on his nose.
Unfortunately, all this information confirms the concerns that the US has sided with Russia. Bloomberg revealed that the Americans would not condemn at the G7 summit the Russians' attack on the city of Sumy, as Trump "work on preserving space for peace negotiations". This is an element: to accomplish something in negotiations, you gotta put your conditions and press, not back off and take the opponent's point of view (yes, we gotta believe like Trump that the Russians were wrong, they didn't want to, it just happened to them that they killed helpless people in a criminal attack). Policy appeasement It won't win him, but it'll only evidence him on the past cards as co-responsible for the tolerance of crime. And approval to hand over the occupied territories to the Russians will be a disgrace to his administration.
What do Polish politicians say? alternatively of calling things by name, most presidential candidates (except for Hołownia and Biejat) took on water in their mouths, and as they have already spoken, like Braun or Mentzen, to say that they will not send Polish soldiers to Ukraine. In the campaign, they draw up alternate topics on immigrants, genders and sexual preferences alternatively of addressing what concerns the president's main prerogatives: abroad policy, defence and external aggression. These topics in the electoral run are mostly marginalized, due to the fact that most candidates either have no good ideas, or they clump about migrants (like Nawrocks). And yet we anticipate the president not only to be brave, but to be wise in the event of an armed conflict. If the main motive for the tv debates is to be common lashes and their heroes to change Trzaskowski and Nawrocki, then we do not have a chance to learn more about candidates' views on the most crucial issues. To be honest, I would like one-on-one tv and radio discussions involving journalists, or experts asking questions, alternatively than one-minute clippings that I can read in the propaganda brochures of future “presidents”. The press reports from the debates confirm that their subject is who was on them and who was missing, who behaved and how they fell out, not his or her views. Speaking of views has long since happened passé.
