I have a concrete example. The review of the small Mermaid by Adriana Prodeus [1] was before my eyes. It formulates the following criteria for evaluation of films:
A good movie is designed to make “girls power”, to give a field of black culture. Women and black people are expected to influence the film. The past of exploitation is to be and to show the sad reality alternatively than the beautiful diversity that is simply a story. This multiculti is, fresh York 1 where different people live harmoniously and it is wrong. There's got to be something else to compose about.
II
I utilized this deep metaphor once: imagine that individual has specified a criterion for evaluating films, that a good movie is 1 that takes place in Kłobuck. And if there's no Kłobuck in the movie, he's weak. It can make reviews, but for others they will be worthless due to the fact that we have average rating criteria: action, actor's game, sound, image, camera work, specified as. And the same is actual here: we will learn nothing about movie aspects. It's almost nothing, due to the fact that it's good about songs.
Anyway, the essence of the thing is that it's actually an audience that's not so much against what doesn't care about those criteria. good movie people want to watch, and the criteria haven't changed much over the years. A small movie art evolved, but not that much. The essence of Adrian's reviewer represents the level of social and critics assessing culture from Marxist positions in those times. To Stalin, Bieruta, Gomulki. It is full of analogy and it should be easy for us, having specified experience, to read the thought sub-building of a akin columnist work with its dogmas, specified as the fight against patriarchism, which is part of capitalism. The white heterosexual male as another incarnation of coercion and another reaction forces. It must besides end similarly: the extermination of a public ignoring the achievements of the next phase of the revolution.
III
Why is Disne doing old animations? Yes, he does not lose on fresh acting adaptations. I guess. But it's about trashing them, just like it did with Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, Willow, etc. "Evil is incapable to make anything new, it can only distort and destruct what has been invented or created by the forces of good."
In the meantime, we won't know about the cultural origin of the incriminated mermaid fairy tale. That he put this communicative into circulation in the tragic version of Hans Christian Andersen. Dane. That it belongs to the cultural sphere of what? That we have a cultural property here.
Adrian's reviewer tries to rise his social position here [4] by aspiring to Anglo-Saxon society, that as he claims to be liable for exporting slaves to America, he becomes 1 of the exporting. He belongs to this group. Oh, no. For them, he's inactive an intermediate.
These sick aspirations make it not lift (Adrian) our dramas, misfortunes, exploitation. It copys the Anglo-Saxon discourse without thought (especially!!!) due to the fact that it wants to belong there. Meanwhile, we are not a post-Protestant, post-Puritan and mostly messed up society. That's why we're being discriminated against, and erstwhile someone's grandpa was killed by communists, or in the Ubek case, he died, and he shrugs his arms at those problems. Like Lajkonik, who is he? This is Tatar who stayed after the robbery and lived with us and acclimatized.
IV
As you can see, the revolution went to the next phase [2], while Disnej se thought it would change colors here, you would insert toxic femaleity and milk the cashier. Right now, he's putting the shareholders' ignorance that he's doing it for the money. But the works from the next phase would make the flap inevitable and you couldn't bullshit any more. Adriana and her companions will not do the screening. There has been quite a few discussion on this subject recently, where 1 and the another claimed that for money the labels go into vocalism, but after all, that is what makes a flop.
Why does specified an approach gotta produce pocket films? Why can't you make a movie about Zulus Chace?
Footnotes:
1 - ]]>https://www.vogue.pl/a/demontaz-attraction-mala-syrenka]]> [3]
2 - Comrade Lenin revealed the fact that the revolution consists of stages. Each phase has its truths, goals, means, methods. After moving on to the next stage, the fact of the erstwhile becomes a lie, etc.
3 – he drew my attention to this thing The Woodcutter Rebajło
]]>https://youtu.be/Shrvo1ePfHo]]>
You truly read it like any kind of social.
4 - Notice, however, that Stalin was accused of falsely accusing himself. In an individual sense - a single communist himself personally. They knew that falsely, but the good of the revolution according to them required pitolili phraseda.
