The first movie I remember was "Only for Eagles." In the lead roles of Richard Burton and Clint Eastwood, playing, soldiers, respectively, British and American intelligence. They undertook the almost impossible and carried out the task.
In sports I besides liked tough guys like our athletics Kozakiewicz and Malinowski, basketball player Jordan and tennis player Djokovic. Djokovic especially impressed me erstwhile he refused to vaccinate, though he was threatened with exclusion from the Australian Open, where he was always a favorite. I didn't want any vaccines. That's not what I thought. I was impressed by my willingness to go to war with the full planet so as not to let myself to impose rules that you do not accept. Djokovica was thrown out of the tournament and out of Australia, but he was on his way.
In Poland, the perfect of an athlete-hardy was always for me Justyna Kowalczyk, always ready to cross the limits of endurance and even monstrous pain to accomplish the dream goal. It is besides worth mentioning in order to emphasize that real strength does not have gender, which has been convinced by characters from past and life, besides from the immediate surroundings.
Strong politicians were Margaret Thatcher and Golda Meir. Their sex was perfectly irrelevant in terms of strength. Women mostly seem stronger than men, although sometimes they give their men a gift in the form of appearances of their own powerlessness, which allows them to cultivate the illusion of their own strength. The strength of women has, of course, the incorrect side. As you know, they are, for example, spreaders of the flu, due to the fact that there is no human strength for a cold man to get out of bed and the more he leaves the house. He just, it's normal, dies.
It should be stressed that I am writing here only about the actual force, which allows us to fight adversity, defy the stronger and effort the impossible. Threatening the weak and setting up the powerless is not a force, it's a worthy thug and a thug.
Of course, to complicate things, the same people sometimes execute in diametrically different roles. The Piłsudski fighting the invaders was strength and honor. Piłsudski's trampling opposition and its rights, it was already weak and simple murderism.
Unfortunately, we live in a planet of deception and appearances. The image is more crucial than the truth, the puppets and followers are more crucial than reality, make up is more crucial than face. Nawrocks and Trump are 2 excellent examples of this. Unfortunately, nobody told Nawrock that knowing and getting them girls was not proof of force. He's just proof you're a gang buddy and a pimp.
However, he is impressed by the gangus, his world, hence being cast at Trzaskowski's track-kibol calls, specified as "I am coming for you" or "be a man at last". The expected expert on masculinity tested it only on the "love ship". However, erstwhile it was essential to get off the deck and enter the election ringing of debate, the boxer reportedly utilized a series of evasive and second-hand tricks to escape the ring. Unfortunately, my friend Nawrocki, these eggs in the Frog will not buy, although a wide scope of ours The Frog is waking my admiration.
What country, specified pimp
Trump worked on an infinitely larger scale than Nawrock's thugs. He is besides the president of the United States, not the schmuck who aspires to the presidency in Poland. The gangsters and villains' society impresses him, of course. However, while Nawrocki liked to hang out with large Bu, Ole and the herring, Trump preferred Epstein. Like a country, like Manhattan.
Trump is simply a clown who, like Nawrocki, poses as a strong man. Hence, these knayak texts about leaders of another countries who kiss his ass (even imagining it disgusts him). Trump is evidently strong erstwhile it is possible to intimidate mediocre illegal immigrants, good Canadians, susceptible Danes and fighting for the lives of Ukrainians.
However, erstwhile specified Putin appears on the horizon, Trump's tight biceps flaunt, the chest falls, and the language of a violent individual turns into the language of a breech, weak, weak and losing. Trump becomes a sneakers. I don't know what else is going on with Trump, but even erstwhile he talks about Putin, he sees the full readiness of the political and erotic satisfaction of the Russian dictator. Trump's alleged power melts like, nomen omen, ice.
Nawrocks are just a dick, Trump is simply a large game that pretends to be an invincible emperor. Both of them are alternatively imbecile, highly complexed with tiny brains and low IQs. There's nothing to be afraid of. There's something to laughter about.
In 1978, Vaclav Havel wrote a celebrated essay "The Power of the Powerless", indicating a large possible force of seemingly helpless people willing to take up a clear moral position and supporting this clarity, uncompromising, symbolic gesture. It was not an essay about Nawrock and Trump, nor an essay addressed to Nawrock and Trump of this world. Apart from the fact that no of them read any essays, and doubtful even if any of them knew who Havel was.
An essay about Nawrocki and Trump should bear the title: "The Appearances of Powerless Weaks". Havel would have given it a better title, of course. possibly Power Appearances. Havla's gone, and she won't compose anything. The essay is written about itself by Trump and Nawrocks. Mediocrity is simply a work of art. The past of essays will not enter into the past of politics, although they both may, as a symbol of the vanity of our times and our modern politics.
Some had Mandela and Havla, others have masquerade and Muska.
