Defend yourself or not? That's the question.

I would like to discuss an interesting approach of 2 voters about whom I know they voted for KO (PO).

Both are gunmen with a permit. Are they in favour of access to weapons? I'll add: legal.

To any extent, yes. They own it. If there were no access, they wouldn't have. So I guess they're there somehow. I personally wrote about this many times – mentioning the explanation of erstwhile Deputy Minister of MON Romuald Sheremietev based on a simple analysis of the fact that Switzerland was not attacked by Hitler in the IIWS due to the fact that she was determined to defend to the last bullet and the last defender of the country. These signals send to the 3rd Reich very specifically. respective Nazi aircraft crossing the Swiss airspace were shot down without a pardon. German soldiers were interned doing the same. Generally, the signal was simple. However, delight note that the full Swiss defence society was united and supported unanimously the functioning of its government. It's worth remembering. Another aspect which Mr. Sheremietiev raised was, of course, a simple message that if a crucial part of society is an absolute majority is armed And determined to usage weapons – towards the possible of any aggressor goes a very simple signal: it will not be easy. Add to this analyses made for many years at military academies around the world, including in the US, fighting partisans (to these analyses Mr. Sheremietieev had access to – quoted them), saying that in order to neutralize the live sewing threatening in the occupied area, the business troops should have an advantage of at least a twelve soldiers per armed guerrilla. Let us imagine the situation that 15 million Poles have a ball weapon – including a storm gun, can usage it and this signal goes into the ether. A possible invader seeking to control our lands would gotta set up at least respective more armies. To make certain that this area is under control. Even utilizing state-of-the-art technology would not let him to occupy an effective area. Drones may attack but they have batteries and are incapable to control the area 24 hours a day. It takes force alive – soldiers to occupy the area.

Such assumptions are made by losers around the world. Only here we do not analyse this most simple and comparatively cheapest version of safety. Of course, for this we request Poles - patriots. But are there surely specified patriots, mother-parents, who want to die for the planet due to the fact that Poland is something like this, as they frequently say, “Christ of nations”?

Let us look at this concept. Who uses it? That's interesting, due to the fact that among my colleagues in patriotic and right-wing circles, no 1 uses this concept as a concept; which they would like to implement. I mean, "I want to die for another nations." Or even, "I want to die for the Polish nation." I haven't heard either.

To make it more interesting: the vast majority do not want to die at all, and the desire to have a weapon motivates first, that they simply want to learn how to usage it, to see: 'can I play', to rise qualifications – to get active in sports shooting – which simply raises... Nobody wants to die for anything. Yes, somewhere in the back of the head – and note: no division into right-wing, left-wing or liberals: everyone speaks; just in case due to the fact that the hard times are going.

Absolutely everyone. So besides the leftist I know and the liberal and the rightist. But why? I'm asking any of them. 1 responds: to have something to defend themselves while fleeing to Germany abroad and then to Switzerland. Another: to defend myself and the household from the gangs that will surely rise. Three: I don't know what's gonna happen, but it's better to be armed than not. Another: I'll know how to usage a gun, I don't want 1 due to the fact that I love peace And I'm a pacifist, but I shoot what I can to learn, due to the fact that erstwhile it comes to what I'm counting on, I'm going to get it. It's a cross section. Of course there are those who say they only have for Fanu. And they grin strangely without saying anything.

That's the way it is. In our nation. Now, let us complete the analysis of the word “Christ of the nations”. It turns out that this concept is utilized in an unauthorized way by the media not entirely Polish, any specified unusual liberal and absolutely not right-wing. What's behind this? A simple sociotechnique of disgusting the notion of patriotism. This “Christ of nations” means that we are foolishly consecrated and inactive get prey by dying in the name of ... yes – patriotism (not defined e.g.: love for the country despite stupid I treacherous politicians, commanders – in the September run for example - and specified akin examples).

So these expected patriots blinded by their love for their homeland without loving their fellow men And in spite of them, they go willingly to die for those fools who prove them, or what they are told... I'm not saying that for all the mass that died during the IIWS fighting a fewer specified things, the fanatics can say that, but from what I've been talking to the pervert veterans, my grandparents And many of the others who survived the war were mostly intended to survive, and the weapon was the addition that made it easier. As they have already gained it, they utilized it either to defend their families, villages, etc. against the devastating advantage of enemies (various Germans, Russians, Sponsors, their communists, etc.), or for fear of bandits who were full and depending on the situation they claimed to be left-wing, right-wing guerrillas, or any another 1 representing any ideals or power.

The conclusion is one: all the assumptions conveyed by liberal media threatening with this concept are unauthorized due to the fact that they are based on a presumption that specifically created that the people who died died due to the fact that they wanted to. And that's absurd. But the presumption in your head is simple: we will repeat 1,000 times or more of our lying theory...

And as Pavlov's reaction people will associate her with this ugly notion of patriotism. Thus it will deprive Poles of self-organization due to the fact that anyone who wants to defend his fyrtl (from Poznań: the area in which he lives, may be a house, a tenement house, a block, etc.) will be considered a dangerous patriot. But it is from these smallest social cells that defenders work most effectively – due to the fact that they defend their families of their belongings sometimes. That's the point. To disgust the thought of a common integration for defence purposes, to disgust the thought that 1 can defend himself at all due to the fact that it is not trendy – after all, as I have heard from the mouth of colleagues about left-wing views – we have police to defend ourselves, we will call and come... Yes... especially the police are presently so understaffed that as I heard from a colleague; as for the accident, say that an ambulance must arrive due to the fact that otherwise we will arrive in a fewer hours due to the fact that there are no people... That's naive.

Simplifying the equation: Christ of nations = Patriotism (which in this edition – and everyone else is not trends) which gives us the effect of rejection. There is no defence of home miru only immediately from a thick pipe: Poland, Warsaw etc ... No, it's not. For Gdansk we will not die! callback the celebrated sayings of 1 of our “souls”.

In the meantime, I repeat: the best is local patriotism, which I don't really know if it's specified a conscious patriotism – everyone will most likely defend their home built up there even without valuables – I would call it artifacts from life, defend his cool motorcycle, his BMW or another precious machine. due to the fact that he's attached to these things. Sometimes you get attached to your wife, Mother, son, daughter... And you want to defend them, too. And to the neighbour sometimes, 'cause a cool guy talks like a beer and watches a game. And besides, it's better to defend yourself from that neighbour across the street due to the fact that he never suits us... Although as if they had come (Russians, Germans ... whoever) then possibly I would have needed it due to the fact that it's going to the gym is "rounded" knows sports fighting for such...to last first...

Yeah, and we're getting to the bottom of it. Let us not let ourselves to make water out of our brains: We do not request any lofty words. For what? Personally, I think it is adequate that about 15 million Poles will think so as I wrote above. I'll add 15 million... armed Poles.

Finally, about these 2 gentlemen who voted for the PO due to the fact that they hated the writing (for the same thing that the PO had done before and again began to do with double force - but this is simply a different story). So 1 shoots himself for a fan chasing the shooting ranges dynamically and doing nothing but training... in fact, offensively to fight. Besides, he said himself, "if it's hard, he'll go to Rusk." His will. I'm not defending him. They're needed, too. I mean, aside from the fact that wellness doesn't work even if I'm super full functional, I'd never go first. Even later. I'd alternatively quit any "talent" in defence of my family. That's why I'm building a beautiful large group of people around here who think the same way; due to the fact that always together - strength.

I would add that this gentleman, while playing his shooting, emphasizes: for his own hard-earned money (a lighter state), does not realize how individual might want to build more shooting ranges, so that people would shoot them for half free, or even for free children would play shooting sports. Parents should pay. So why the shooting ranges?

See the logic? due to the fact that I don't.

The second: he besides shoots for the fan, but without breath - he concluded that the static had to be mastered to better aim and possible shooting shields “disposal” from a greater distance. He bought himself any guns. The Patriot does not want to be due to the fact that he associates with this unfortunate “Christ” but I presume that the families want to defend, even in escaping to another country (as shortly as he can and succeeds, which will not be easy). And that's actually adequate for me. There's 1 more thing to scare off, he's got a licence for respective guns to teach his woman... At least it won't be easy for the Russians to rape.

I hope there's as many of them as possible. due to the fact that as a result, a Pole with a Pole will always get along with any external enemy. And no 1 will look at whether in the last vote, his colleague voted for an KO or a Writ or a Confederate or whatever... standing side by side in front of an aggressor-gnore who wants to fart his fresh super car, rape his wife and rob the home and burn it.

Together, we'll stand up for our families and our homes, and that's it - and... no more. Just to be clear.