What is simply a day after tablet? The tablet is simply a synthetic hormone that inhibits ovulation and makes it hard to connect sperm to the egg cell. Therefore, the ‘day after’ tablet is considered emergency contraception. So she should not origin moral dissension. However, the tablet ‘day after’ is simply a hormonal agent with a very strong effect on the female body. Physicians inform about the serious consequences of taking this pill for the wellness of a woman. You don't request medical education to read in the drug description that “due to the possible side effects of the tablets are not intended for frequent use, they will be bought no more than erstwhile all 30 days”. And a female should not drive a car after taking a pill.
Is this why women can be banned from utilizing “day after” tablets? Can anyone be forbidden to drink alcohol (in large quantities) or to smoke cigarettes? An adult should be aware of his decisions and the consequences. Therefore, in matters as crucial as treatment and the adoption of medical treatment, these issues are clearly and unequivocally regulated by the Act of 5 December 1996 on the competition of doctors and dentists. Article 32 p. 1 of the Act provides:
‘Your doctor may execute a physical examination or another wellness benefits, subject to the exceptions provided for in the Act, after agreement by the patient“.
Therefore, it is the work of a doctor to get the consent of a patient to treatment and to take certain medical measures, and it is an inalienable right of a patient to get reliable information from a doctor on the foreseeable consequences of their use. The case is clear erstwhile the patient is an adult and can consciously consent. In the case of insignificant (underage) patients, the Act referred to in Article 32 p. 2 provides:
‘If you are a minor or incapable to give informed consent, the consent of its statutory typical is required, a if you do not have a statutory representative or it is impossible to communicate with him - authorisation of the welfare court“.
Thus, in the case of a insignificant patient, it is the legal work for the doctor to get authorisation for treatment and medical measures, but not expressed by the patient only by his legal representative. Is that until I was 18? No, the Act in Article 32 p. 5 provides:
‘If you are 16 years of age, you are required also his consent“.
In conclusion, until the age of 16, a doctor is required to get approval from a legal typical of the patient after the age of 16, until the age of 18, a doctor is required to get two consents: both the statutory typical of the patient and the patient itself. Applicable in Poland law does not allowto start treatment, to prescribeand to compose a prescription for a insignificant who is under 18 without the consent of his legal representative.
The regulation published in the authoritative diary allows women over the age of 15 to buy a ‘day after’ pill without a prescription issued by a doctor, and the pharmacist will only be required to interview a insignificant patient to determine, among another things, the appropriateness of selling the tablet ‘day after’. In this way, Mrs. Leschina broke the law in force in Poland. First, the application of the ‘day after’ tablet is to be a pharmacist alternatively than a doctor, and second, consent is to be given by an underage individual alternatively than by his legal typical as provided by the law. Many ministers of the current government have committed manifest violations of the law. You can take over tv by force, you can forcefully remove prosecutors from their positions. They are illegal, but in any time they are reversible. However, it is irreversible to apply to minors, young girls, unaware of the risks and future consequences, to apply them against the applicable hormonal remedies law. No 1 destroyed their wellness will always return. The representatives of the Chief Pharmacy Chamber are aware of this, who, in their Communication of 30 April 2024, stated: "The ultimate Pharmacy Council takes the view that the supply of a insignificant patient with an emergency contraceptive medicinal product (intelligence and possible pharmaceutical prescription), on the basis of a decision by a pharmacist, require the consent of the statutory typical of the insignificant patientIt’s okay. ”
Is it possible that Minister Izabela Leszczyna, erstwhile taking on the position of Minister of Health, could not become acquainted with the fundamental law in force in the Polish wellness service? Is it possible that she does not have coworkers and advisers who have learned about this law on her behalf? This is not possible, so I wrote in the title of this text: They know what they're doing. Mrs. Lestin not only breaks the law, but knowingly endangers the wellness and life of minors, endangers the wellness and life of young Polish girls. Mrs. Leszczyna commits crimes on the Polish Nation. In this case, we must not wait, we must not put this aside for the future, we must not put it on the future ministers of future governments. We must request that Mrs. Leschina be immediately dismissed from her position as Minister of Health, that her immunity be lifted and that she be brought to justice. But above all, we must request the immediate withdrawal of a regulation so harmful to the wellness of minors. This case must not be waited.because the consequences will be dramatic for the wellness of Polish women and for the future of Polish Nation.
They know what they do. They know precisely what they're doing..
