"The Strongest Moment". Emotions after the presidential debate

news.5v.pl 1 month ago

The name of Karol Nawrocki as a liar by Szymon Holovnia was, according to Barbara Oliwacka of Poland 2050, "the strongest moment" of the Monday presidential debate. A candidate supported by the PiS threatened the Marshal of the Sejm with a lawsuit. After leaving the studio, however, he did not declare to take specified a step.

Agnieszka Gozdyr asked her guests about the most interesting part of Monday's presidential debate.

Presidential debate 2025. Nawrocki did not declare to file a lawsuit

– The strongest minute was the question of Szymon Holown to Karol Nawrocki and naming it (the case concerning the studio – ed.) that He lied, and he took his place. said Barbara Oliwicka from Poland 2050. She recalled that her organization leader encouraged Nawrocki to file a suit if he thought he was telling the fact about the apartment.

SEE: Comments from the presidential debate. “He took over the ball and scored the goal”

The question asked immediately after leaving the studio was asked Nawrocks. – I'm not so excited about all these lawsuits.. But the marshal was fooling around, and I tried to explain. If I have time, possibly I will, but for now I don't think about it," said the candidate supported by the Law and Justice.

"Charity is confused with self-interest"

Oliwacka stated that housing issues are 1 of the most crucial topics of this campaign, while Nawrocki "reduced municipal property utilizing legal loopholes". She added that if a candidate supported by the Law and Justice felt innocent, he would sue Holovnia in election mode. – Charles Nawrocki shows that he is not honest. Charity is confused with same - interest – she said.

Holovnia itself is not afraid of the lawsuit, which he passed on to journalists after the debate ended. He (Nawrocki-ed.) was afraid. If he was gonna sue me, he'd sue me. Mr. Nawrocki lied, he said.

Andrzej Costowniak of the Law and Justice Department admitted that he did not know whether Nawrocki would go to court in this case. At the same time, he argued that the president of IPN explained the full substance which is ‘complex’.