The designation of Karol Nawrocki as a liar by Szymon Holovnia was, according to Barbara Oliwacka from Poland 2050, the "strongest moment" of Monday's presidential debate. A candidate supported by the PiS threatened the Marshal of the Sejm with a lawsuit. After leaving the studio, however, he did not declare to take specified a step.
On the "Debate after debate" program, Agnieszka Gozdyr asked her guests about the most interesting part of Monday's presidential debate.
Presidential debate 2025. Nawrocki did not declare to file a lawsuit
- I'm sorry. The strongest minute was the question of Simon Holown to Karol Nawrocki and naming it (the case concerning the studio - ed.) that He lied, and he took his place. said Barbara Oliwicka from Poland 2050. She recalled that her organization leader encouraged Nawrocki to file a suit if he thought he was telling the fact about the apartment.
SEE: Comments from the presidential debate. "He took over the ball and scored a goal"
The question asked immediately after leaving the studio was asked Nawrocks. - I'm sorry. I'm not so excited about all these lawsuits.. But the marshal was fooling around, and I tried to explain. If I have time, possibly so, but for now I don't think about it - said the candidate supported by the Law and Justice.
"Charity is confused with interest"
Oliwacka stated that housing issues are 1 of the most crucial topics of this campaign, while Nawrocki "weakened municipal property utilizing legal loopholes". She added that if a candidate supported by the Law and Justice felt innocent, he would sue Holovnia in election mode. - I'm sorry. Charles Nawrocki shows that he is not honest. Charity is confused with same - interest - she said.
Holovnia itself is not afraid of the lawsuit, which he passed on to journalists after the debate ended. - He was scared. If he was gonna sue me, he'd sue me. Mr. Nawrocki lied, he said.
Andrzej Costowniak of the Law and Justice Department admitted that he did not know whether Nawrocki would go to court in this case. At the same time, he argued that the president of IPN He explained the full case, which is "complex".
