From the dawn of Christianity to the present, it scares Christians and the passion of the Jews, the bloody ghost of the legend of ritual mortuary. They believe in it or deny its existence enlightened individuals, argue over it by Oriental scholars, experts in Hebrew antiquity, any in favor, others against.
It is so far a mystery, not scientifically settled, unsolved, closed ultimately. This mystery is inactive open to biased polemics and investigation by experts. Only the people believe and say that “Jews request Christian blood for their tentacles.”
From historical figures Bishop of Lugduński Agobard († 840) has already hit the ritual execution in his works: “De insolentia judaeorum“ and “De judaicis superstitionibus“
Cardinal Cezary Baronius (born 1538 † 1607), confessor of Pope Clement VIII, Vatican librarian, creator of the celebrated “Church Yearbooks” (Annales Ecclesiastici) lists a number of ritual murders from 425 to Nar. Christ, drawing the dates and names of the victims from the archival sources of the Vatican. His work was continued, as we know, by the Bollandists.
They had a large deal of problem and investigative work with the phantom legend of ritual mortuary. The 19th century itself, an enlightened age, looked astounded at more than a 100 trials, with a gloomy background.
One specified process is adequate to illustrate them.
On the large Thursday 1475 (March 24), a 29-month-old boy, Simon, boy of Christian parents, died in the Trident. erstwhile the child's corpse was found, 7 Jews were ordered by Prince-Bishop Hinderbach before the trial court, Jana de Salis di Brescia, accusing them of ritual murder. The court records of this trial, sent to Rome to approve the judgment, rested for any time in secret archives Castri S. Angela de Urbe, then moved to the Vatican, where they were forgotten over time. Even the Bollandists, who dig through the Roman archives, writing about the trial trial, knew nothing about them. Pope Benedict XIV addressed them in his work entitled “De Canonisatione Sanctorum“.
The court records include evidence of the accused of ritual execution of Jews, which Prof. Dr. A. Rohling made public in his survey entitled "Das Blutritual der Juden“ (1883).
The accused Jews denied their engagement in the killing of the child, but they, by the customized of that time, for torture, declared that they would tell the full fact if their podestas “take off the cord.” “Photos of cords” told unusual things, more than the investigator demanded of them.
Testimony under the horror of torture could be either a scream or a delirium of fear without technological value, but for the fact that all defendants testified mutatis mutantis Same, although they could not communicate with each another due to the fact that they were kept in separate, alertly guarded targets and examined each individual.
All the accused Jews testified about the same, but any knew more, others less, depending on their age, or the positions they took among their own. Samuel, the owner of the home where the execution was to be carried out, says the most widely.
From this Samuel learned the trident judges that the mystery of the “ ritual murder” was known only by the elders and excellent judaic notables, and they knew it not from the books, not from writings, but from the tradition given from mouth to mouth, from father to son.
When asked how far this tradition goes and why The Jews request Christian blood, he stated that: before many, many years, erstwhile Christianity was not yet a European religation, Babylonian scholars came to the council and vindicated that Christian blood greatly contributed to the salvation of the judaic soul, but only erstwhile it was brought distant from the child, tormenting them in the manner that Christ, whose “Christians call their God, was tormented.” Since this ritual operation is to be a reminder, a repetition of Christ's torment, it is so to be utilized by a male child, for Christ had the body of a man. The blood of a girl, even erstwhile she is simply a kid under the age of seven, is not suitable for ritual rites — it is “ungood”.
In describing the ceremony of the supper (on Passover day) Samuel told that the father of the household was dumping (usually hidden) into the cake from which matés are to be made, any Christian, liquid, fresh, or powdered, old blood. He besides pours a speck of this blood into the cup. At the beginning of the meal, the macha in the cup of fingers and sprinkles the wine with food and table, cursing at this ceremony with an undertone, in Hebrew, all opponents of the Jews and their faith.
In the same way, the judaic feasts are described with fine varieties by all the more fresh scholars of the customs and customs of the rightful Hasid, but not the operation with Christian blood. They know nothing about her: Paolo Medici, B’uxdorf, Bartolocci, Basnage and others.
“The method of the ritual murder” was reproduced by Moses, the Old 80-year-old patriarch of the trident ghetto. According to him, Simon was killed in the following way: with a handkerchief so tight that he could not give a human voice, a plate and a half of blood was drawn from him. Then, setting him on the ground in the form of a cross with his hands drawn out from both sides, he was stabbed with sharp heels until he died out of the spirit, which lasted half an hour.
It moved and the judaic gold flowed from everywhere. To Rome, to the emperor, to the princes, there were “mules loaded with gold.” And to the judges of Trident they found their way, and they shook many of them. The prince-bishop Hinderbach was promised by the Jews to rebuild him who had been bitten by the teeth of the time of the castle, the podesta, de Salisa, they tempted, saying, Release ours from under the key, and we'll give you as much gold as you want.
Jews and Kahalas – Secret papers revealed by hebrew baptized Brafman
He tells of these judaic procedures by Bonelli, drawing news from the trident records, in his “Disertazione apologetica“
But judaic solidarity hit the hard stone of the honesty of the bishop and the podesta. Neither of them were weasels for gold.
It amazed everyone that the bishop of Trident had taken on the Jews, he who liked, defended and protégéded them before killing Simon. He replied to the question: “Let us erstwhile know the truth!” — and he was on his way to the destination, deaf to the sound of mammoths. As a prince-bishop, he was not only the shepherd of his diocese, but besides its secular ruler, its ultimate judge. According to him, the erstwhile Jews were guilty of ritual murder, which was yet accepted by Rome, approving the judgement of the Trident Court (1478).
After the review of the trial, Pope Sixtus IV established a commission, consisting of six cardinals, who were headed by the celebrated Francis Panavin of Padua (uditore delle Causae del S. Palazzo) an excellent lawyer of that time.
Before Panavino went to work, he explained the importance of the bull of the popes Gregory IX and Innocent IV, to which Jews, defending their fellow believers, referred.
According to Panavin, it is not certain whether the bull of Innocent IV of 1247, nevertheless Baronius recorded it in his “Yearbooks”, is authentic, but it does not halt the appropriate improvement of the process, due to the fact that it does not turn against ritual execution at all, but only against malicious, unjust, slanderous accusations of Jews and punishments committed without trial and proof of guilt, What happened sometimes. All Privileges of the Jews a parte abolished the Vienna Concil.
Non obstant — said Panavino — privilegia Gregorii et Innocenti: tum quianon faciunt fidem nec authentica nec sine suspicione falsei, tum quia etiam ad litteram intellect non sunt servanda ad jure, tum etiam quia Concilium Vienense talia rescripta aparte improbat, tum etiam quia sane intellect ecludunt samam fraudientam calumniam. Patet non fuisse intent of pricedentium talia privilegia nisi ecludere calomnios vexativnes.
Having thus placed the case, Panavino and his cardinals subjected the trial trial to review and having examined the submitted file, the rightfulness of the prosecution recognized and approved the sentence.
As in the Trident, the Jews besides testified in the second European-wide process of ritual murder, which took place in Damascus (1840), to the European consuls, due to the assassination of O. Thomas, Capucin, although they were “not taken for cords”, to torture. And as in the Trident, so in Damascus, he sentenced them to death, from which their gold, brought by Cremieux, later French Minister, and Montefiore, president Alliance Israelite Universelle, pair of England. Until specified judaic matadors considered it an work to fly to Damascus to rip their fellow believers out of the clutches of the executioner.
Extraordinary solidarity! There is no specified thing in any another nation, in any another race.
What the accused and condemned Jews in the Trident and Damascus said about the ritual mortality only stated the fact itself, without explaining the essence, psychology of the degenerative act. Only baptized Jews did this, mostly rabbis and scribes, acquainted with the ritual mystery of their nation.
Not Christians commented on the “ritutal murder”, and it was for the simple reason that they did not know, could not know the secrets of the ghetto, guarded urgently from the reluctant, watchful eye of the ingenuaries. They were done by neophytes. How the Talmud denounced Christian, ecclesiastical and secular authorities, Jews baptized before German humanism got to the books of Judah, so they served their erstwhile neophiles terribly, cruelly, betraying the mystery of ritual murder. If they lied by anger, by hating the Jews, who, as we know, did not spare and spare their sects of contempt and persecution, work falls for the bloody consequences of this “discovery” on their conscience.
John of Feltro, the neophyte, called in 1475 by the Podestal of Trident, John de Salis, as an expert in Simon's execution trial, acknowledged the existence of a ritual execution and explained how Jews usage Christian blood for their mysteries.
And our Jacob Frank, the creator and ruler of the Frankists, having been baptized, accused the Jews before the Polish authorities of ritual murder. The same is confirmed by the archmandrite of Lavra Pochajowska, Awtonom, from Jews in Kiev.
However, only 1 neophyte of Moldavo, a baptized judaic rabbi (born 1765), reached the nucleus of the ritual morde. Having changed his religion at the age of thirty, he wrote (in 1803) in the Moldovan language a brochure entitled “The End of the Hebrew Religion”, translated into Greek and Arabic, and incorporated into the work of French Orientalist Achilles Laurent, p. t. “Rélation historique des affaires de Syria depuis 1840— 1842“.
As John of Feltro and the accused trident and Damascus Jews besides tells the erstwhile rabbi that the secret to the usage of blood is only held by the notes of Judah: rabbis, teachers, scholars and Pharisees, or the most legitimate of the Hasidic. The remainder of us know nothing about the meaning of this mystery. And like them, it confirms that this secret, traditionally passed from father to son, protected from the commune, is not recorded in any judaic book.
The request for Christian blood for wine and mac is explained by the Moldavian rabbi in this way: any commit ritual execution from hatred of non-Jews (police fanatics), others for medical purposes, as they attribute blood to Christian healing properties (magics), the 3rd in the end for fear of “the divine punishment” (cabalists, mystics). For they are “learned in writing” and rabbis who hesitate about the concept of a individual of Christ: was he truly a judaic Messiah or not? If he was, he must be atoned with him by consuming the blood of his followers, or blood.
What Moldavo says about the mystical side of the ritual murder, Samuel Tridentsky has already said, testifying in the investigation that “Christian blood is needed by a hebrew to save the soul”, with only the difference that he did not know why, for what reasons?
If the comment of erstwhile Rabbi Moldawa agrees with the truth, he could only be born in the head of any “mistaked mystic”. For it is essential to be “mistaked” in order to be able to combine the salvation of the judaic soul by Christian blood with defiance, insulting the passion of Christ. But it is known that mysticism and cabals come up with ideas, arguing with simple logic, astounding their perverseness.
From among Aryan scholars he dealt with the ritual execution in item Dr. August Rohling, prof. of Hebrew antiquity at the Prague University. He believes there is simply a ritual murder.
For his studies about Talmud, they threw themselves at him with large fury reformed Viennese rabbis, calling him: a fool, a reverser, a obscurant, an anti-Semite, as the Jews call anyone who does not take their hand, who dares to look into their books and intentions. Rohling proved to the rabbis in his answer entitled “Meine Antworten an die Rabbiner“ (1883) that he is not a fool, but they, for he knew the Hebrew language and Talmud better than they did. His works are an excellent textbook for everyone who is occupied by the judaic psyche, for they are German thoroughness and accuracy. From him I mostly learned my “Jewish Wisdom”.
He besides believes in the ritual execution of our Hebrew priest Pranajtis. He goes even further than Rohling and the baptised judaic rabbis, for he says that he decoded in the mystical book “Zohar” not only the confirmation of this crime, but besides the method of murder, as he pointed out in his opinion of Mapert about the Kiev Bejlis.
In particular, the second expert, the Kiev Dr. Sikorski, noticed how the reported journals, on the body of the boy Yuszczyński, the same "killing technique" described by the Jews of Trident 400 years ago.
The opponents of the ritual murder, not believing in it, were: the Fuldaic bishop, the present cardinal Kopp, the archbishop of Erlauski in Hungary, the friar of O. Bonawentura and respective Protestant writers, in addition to the Paris Rabbi L. Vogue, who fought a terrible legend with large momentum.
So much discipline and past of ritual mortality.
It is not adequate to answer the question ultimately, decisively: whether a ritual execution exists or does not exist. For the evidence of the accused Jews may be the consequence of fear, at the bottom of explanations of baptizers or anti-Semites may savor hatred, judicial sentences may yet be wrong, which sometimes happens.
In any case, if ritual execution exists or exists so far, it does not fall on the full judaic nation, but only on any mystical or cabalistic sect.
And we Christians know what terrible, crazy results mystic brains are coming to, and we have had and have so far our demented sectarians, specified as, and so on, whose ideas flout logic and human feelings. Recently, however, any marjovites demanded that their clergy let themselves to be crucified.
But we Christians, We are not solidarity with this kind of spiritual madness, knowing their origin and We don't stand together, poop in defence of the defendants.
This mistake is always made and everywhere only by Jews to their disadvantage.
The nervous, delicate to everything that relates to them, they hatred the lightest criticism of the innoisseurs, wind even in innocent comedy ("Golden Cielec") or in any humorous monologue (Klemens Junosha) of an assassination on their national dignity.
Wherever the Innovative Authority takes a hebrew for a collar and puts him in front of their courts (trials in the Trident, Damascus, Dreyfuss, etc.) moves, the full Judah storms, outraged — roars, the full judaic press of both hemispheres of the earth crows. The hebrew is not allowed to lay a finger on anyone due to the fact that he is simply a “chosen nation”. But his writers, his press are allowed us, Christians, to defame, spit, ridicule what is happening systematically, constantly.
No 1 could contact more painfully, insult our spiritual traditions and national dignity than Macoch, whose terrible crime desecrated our Jasna Gora Czętachowska, and who of us thought to protest, to smear the crime, to defend an unfortunate criminal? Touched alive, we didn't get active in the trial, waiting for a court order.
And as many as 700 European rabbis were sent to Kiev to protest about Bejlis. Jews of large European cities call rabbles, the full judaic press shouts “obscurantism of Christians...”
Unhandful is the method of defending a case that is not yet explained — not given or proved. alternatively of extinguishing it, only the Jews irritate in this foolish way the indifferent Christians, and their opposers thrill. Smart people are called, and they always lose consciousness and balance in their individual affairs.
Wouldn't it be wise to wait calmly for a court hearing? The courts are from reaching the origin of fact or lies, and Christian courts do not origin hatred, they effort to grasp the root of the fact itself.
Even if the courts, supported by science, proved the existence of ritual murder, the Jews as a nation would not lose anything. For which nation is liable for the aberration of their sects, their semi-mad spiritual mystics?
Teodor Jeske-Choinski, 1914.
Ritual execution in Rzeszów? Historical investigation
