– Why do we not yet know the content of the last conversation of the Kaczyński brothers, just before the Smolensk disaster? – asked our writer Anna Dryjanska, erstwhile justice Wojciech Więczewski.
He ruled in the past on the preparation of the presidential visit in April 2010. I say yes, I think it is simply a substance and political will. And strict political will," he said.
Last conversation of the Kaczynski brothers
– So what, Tusk doesn't want us to know the content of the Kaczynski brothers' last conversation? He was adopted by a journalist. – I think so, and I will say more......There have been various myths and theories about this conversation. 1 issue is very meaningful, due to the fact that yesterday at 1 of the tv stations (...) Jarosław Kaczyński admitted that he spoke to president Prof. Lech Kaczyński twice – erstwhile after 6am and erstwhile after 8am – indicated the erstwhile justice in a conversation with Temat.pl.
And he continued: – So claiming that he did not talk to him twice, it is most delicately speaking, that he misses the truth.
– You know the content of this conversation, so you have said for respective years. The paper has a top-secret clause on it. And now, given your cognition – I know that you cannot quote the content of the paper – whether given the cognition you have, do you consider it actual or close to the truth, the content of the plaque at the wreath, which is placed under the east of Smolensk activist Zbigniew Komosa? – Anna Dryjanska asked him.
Former judge: 1 of the NATO embassies passed on the content of the conversation
– Madam editor, I say yes, I never said I knew the strict content of the conversation. I can say this so I don't miss the fact and at the same time not put myself at risk. 1 of the NATO embassies donated the content of the conversation, and in fact the recording of this conversation, but not the recording of the strict sense – he described.
– So not a stenogram, but a summary, right? – the attention of Dryjanski pointed out. Not a transcript, just a summary of this conversation. And that can be brought back to what I said in my time, which means they're making me problems like they did in Georgia. I hope you can handle this. And this is not a breach of secrecy, what I am saying at this point," stressed the erstwhile judge.
And he added: "It hurt me a lot at a time – I do not want to usage specified a phrase that individual twisted something, omitted something, said something wrong. That's about as much as I can bring it down to, which I can make public.
– Okay, I'll ask you something else. Does the contents of the tablet I just read, or memory of 95 victims of Lech Kaczyński, offend you? – wanted to find out the writer on Temat.pl.
– Let me put it this way, I'm a lawyer, I'm not a psychologist, I'm not a psychiatrist," Mr. “I ask you as a man, not as a lawyer, not as a psychologist,” explained Dryjanska. It doesn't offend me as a human being. due to the fact that the relation between brothers, twins, brothers is very specific. Apparently. I'm talking about what I read in the textbooks of psychiatry, forensic psychology, etc.," concluded the lawyer.
The Smolensk tragedy, which took place on April 10, 2010, is 1 of the most dramatic and shocking disasters in Poland's history. 96 people were killed as a consequence of this tragic event, including president Lech Kaczyński, his wife Maria Kaczyńska, the highest representatives of the state authorities, commander of the armed forces, members of the families of the victims of the disaster, as well as journalists and accompanying persons.
