"I know from the crucible talks with politicians that in mid-January the case seemed to be "slaped" and was in the process," said Prof. Kamil Zajączkowski, referring to the SAFE Act vetoed on Thursday. The change of opinion on the EU mechanics with the erstwhile head of the MON, Mariusz Błaszczak, was judged as astonishing by the expert.
Veto of president Karol Nawrocki to SAFE Act caused a political earthquake. While the government launches "Plan B" in the form of a resolution, Prof. Kamil Zajączkowski, a Europeanist and investigator of global relations, warns that polarization is beginning to endanger the foundations of state security. - This is for us researchers, a fresh and highly dangerous situation - the guest of the program "The Most crucial Questions".
On Thursday's message President Karol Nawrocki has announced that it will not sign the law implementing the EU SAFE mechanism, arguing for this concern for sovereignty. In return, he proposed a task "Polish SAFE 0 percent." based on NBP profits. The government's answer was immediate - on Friday the Polish Monitor was published Resolution of the Council of Ministers "Army Poland"which is intended to enable the programme to be implemented despite the deficiency of signature of the head of state.
Dispute over the implementation mode of the SAFE mechanism. Bill or resolution?
The main controversy is the way in which the post-vet programme is implemented. The government has decided on a resolution, which the opposition and the president's surroundings call "the circumvention of the law". However, Prof. Zajączkowski considers that "EU regulation can be introduced in average government mode". "The President's environment pushes the thesis that this is an global agreement requiring his signature, but the reality is different," he stressed.
SEE: Government movement on SAFE. "Polish Armed Forces Program" published
Inquired by the lead, are we dealing with classical Government agreementProfessor Zajączkowski replied, "That's right. This is simply a financing agreement that falls within the competence of the Council of Ministers. "The full dispute is sad proof of how the immediate organization business takes over the modernization of the military," he said.
Why did the government initially fight for the bill?
Karolina Olejak asked the guest about the point of dispute over the bill, since the same issues can be regulated by resolution. According to Prof. Zajączkowski, the bill had primarily improve spending procedures.
- I'm sorry. The fact is, in geopolitical matters, you gotta anticipate the movements of your opponent. We all know that the aim was to amend the law here in Poland, to improve things, to decision things forward, especially in areas where money can be spent. However, there was no long-term strategical reasoning here," said the professor.
Changing the front of Mariusz Błaszczak
In the conversation there was besides the subject of changing the position of erstwhile head of the MON. The expert recalled that Mariusz Błaszczak He was late an enthusiast of the SAFE program.
- I'm sorry. From the bullet talks with politicians, Still in mid-January, the case seemed "stuck" and was in the process. All the more amazing attitude of Mariusz Błaszczak - said Prof. Zajączkowski. - I have tweets, I read the boards - he showed how crucial the program is for the Polish army. Today, a change of 180 degrees is amazing.
The expert besides referred to Błaszczak's announcement that the Prime Minister should be placed before the Court of State for the implementation of the programme on the basis of a resolution. "This is purely political rhetoric, due to the fact that we are talking about a debt mechanics with the European Commission for circumstantial defence purposes," he concluded.
Did you see anything important? Send a picture, a movie, or compose what happened. usage our Inductors
