Transit is simply a smooth transition from 1 paradigm to another. Although countries specified as Iraq and Libya are already full bankrupt, Wikipedia inactive calls them "regimes in transition". Similarly, the planet strategy is in a state of transit (transition) from liberalism to postmodernism.
Classic liberalism is already becoming a past, absorbed by postmodernism. In its erstwhile text "Global strategy and Antisystem Competition at Metapolitics Level"[1] The author wrote that modern postmodernism had far removed from the assumptions of the creators of classical liberalism (John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham, Adam Smith). The highest good is no longer an individual. Even the nonsubjective existence and consciousness of the individual itself was undermined.
Demoliber and postmodern society always consists of tomized individuals whose sole intent is to consume. According to the author, the correct consequence to the expansion of postmodernism is not to keep ongoing processes in place but to return to the paradigms of conventional society.
During Modernity, natural communities were replaced with artificial mass communities (nations, states, classes). In specified mass communities our identity fades and there is simply a sense of “looseness in the crowd”.
In his erstwhile text, the author wrote about the request to return to natural communities specified as families and clans[2]. Man is able to function well only in a community that combines ties of kinship and community of fate. Only families and clans are communities that give the chance to transfer culture and property.
These functions are not performed by atomic family. The Polish literature of the 19th century describes many stories of families who lost their means of life after the only host father suffered an accident at the factory. The atomic household is incapable to last without social packages from the state. The death or illness of 1 parent prevents it from continuing to function.
The safety and self-sufficiency of all members are provided only by wider communities of relatives (rods). While functioning within the family, man can make his skills and at the same time enrich himself with the accomplishment of others. Families and clans can function decently if they are patriarchal, based on healthy men capable of working and fighting.
System transit goes multi-vector. any elements of liberalism are lost in modern meaning, while others are strengthened even more.
Certainly, the economical section of the strategy (capitalism) based on transnational corporations controlling national governments is increasingly strengthened. All critics of capitalism, led by Charles Marx, were right to say that in the countries that first adopted capitalism (UK, United States, Netherlands) governments always act in the name of large capital.
The bottom-up "people's capitalism" based on tiny enterprise has no chance of competing with large companies. As a consequence of the systemic transformation in Poland in the 1990s, tiny entrepreneurship was completely swept distant by Western large companies.
The demolition of insignificant entrepreneurship by global capital besides occurred in France under the current president Emmanuel Macron, who is simply a puppet in the hands of global corporations. The Yellow Kamizelek Movement in France was a desperate effort to save the interests of tiny entrepreneurs (craftsmen, shopkeepers, manufacturers) threatened by large corporations. It was brutally suppressed by the Macron government. The petty bourgeoisie (petite bougeoisie), which throughout France's past has been the driving force behind its economy, has been completely ground by transnational capital.
If in Belarus or Russia the authorities were to suppress social protests in a akin way, there would most likely be screams in the Western opinion centres that the authoritarian government is pacifying society, suppressing entrepreneurship, etc. However, since the Yellow Kamizelek revolt took place in France, a country that is 1 of the most crucial centres of the West, liberal elites and mainstream media sided with Macron and large capital. Similarly, the protest of the Yellow Kamizelek presented liberal media in Poland. In any places even conspiracy theories have appeared saying that Yellow vests were inspired by Vladimir Putin.
The political section of the strategy (democracy) is increasingly weakening. Under modern globalisation, large capital has a much greater impact on power than social masses.
Classical democracy understood as the regulation of the elite chosen by society is fundamentally a thing of the past. In modern liberal democracies, the gap sharing the global capital-related political elite and social masses is increasing, which only confirms the conclusion that a strategy based on universal equality is simply a utopia.
In the first democracies that began to appear in Europe in the second half of the 19th century. The elite actually legitimized their power by referring to the social masses. The organization that mobilized the most supporters came to power.
In the democracys of the second half of the 19th century. and early 20th century. It was impossible to regulation without the support of a broad social mass. For example, during the period of partitions in Galicia, the strong position was held by conservative environments (so-called “Stans”). From 1895 to 1897, Polish Conservative number Kazimierz Felix Badeni was even Prime Minister of the Government of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.
The situation changed rapidly erstwhile Poland regained its independency in 1918, democracy, organization strategy and universal electoral law were introduced. The main function in the Polish politics began to be played by the parties that subjugated the command circles in the army (Pissudians) or were able to bring masses to the street (socialists, endeci). Aristocracy-related conservative “Stan” organization did not find broad support in society and rapidly became marginalised.
The democratic states thus operated until the mid-20th century. In the second half of the 20th century, erstwhile globalization processes in the planet greatly accelerated for political elites, it became more profitable to base its power on transnational capital.
Today, with the support of elite capital, they can regulation over and sometimes against society, as Macron is. This makes it impossible to make any alternate to the System. Even a tiny liberal organization powered by large capital has better conditions to come to power than a mass populist organization powered only by contributions from its members. National authoritarianisms powered only by taxation revenues, the mobilisation of the masses and the army from the draft always lose to the demoliberal states that support the large capital.
An example of liberal democracy in which the globalist elite separates from society is the French strategy mentioned, as well as the German system.
W Germany's strength that tries to break the ruling strategy is alternate to Germany (Alternative für Deutschland, AfD). However, it seems rather doubtful that AfD could actually seriously endanger the German political class.
A clear gap separating the demoliberal political class from society is besides visible in Poland. There is inactive a political cartel that was formed in the late 1980s and 1990s, and even earlier (in the Polish elite there are inactive active politicians who started operations before 1989). The only thing that changes is the arrangement of forces and organization signs. The basic content of the political class remains the same.
The Kaczyński Intelligence and the Moravian technocrat
Jarosław Kaczyński and another PiS activists from the Centre Agreement (PC) are among the old intelligence having a sense of mission. The “Solidarity” intelligence Kaczyński represented believed that its goal was to lead the Polish society to the planet of liberal democracy of the West. All solidarityal intelligents came from the liberal left and everyone believed in the power of progress. People like Kaczyński had the same sense of mission as the intelligence of the 19th century. operating during partitions.
Bohdan Cywiński in his book “The Roots of the Incorruptible”[3] describes the environment of Polish intelligence in the 19th century. Formed at the end of the 18th century in Kuźnica Kolłatajowska, intelligence set itself the goal of bringing liberal, progressive and democratic values to the Polish society. The sense of this mission led intelligence throughout the 19th century. The same ideals were believed by anti-communist intelligence in the times of the Polish People's Republic.
The old intelligence from “Solidarity” knew well that Poland would become a full liberal Western country only if bankers and technocrats who made the essential reforms took over. Rafał Ziemkiewicz wrote that the intelligence derived from the “Solidarity” will lead Poland to the West, and then the generation of aidless technocrats and bankers will take power.
The typical of this generation of perfect technocracy is Mateusz Morawiecki, connected with the large capital of the economist, who held training at western universities. It should be noted that the father of the erstwhile Prime Minister, Kornel Morawiecki, is besides an intelligent 1 from Solidarity, as is Kaczyński. He is an example of the fact that old intelligence intended to accomplish its mission intentionally raised a generation of non-ideo technocrats.
Technocrats specified as Mateusz Morawiecki in no way betrayed the ideas of their fathers. On the contrary, erstwhile the governments of global capital introduced in Poland, they completed the full process of integration with the West, i.e. they carried out a mission which guided intelligent people from “Solidarity” specified as Jarosław Kaczyński and Kornel Morawiecki.
Liberal environments in Russia, which in the current situation have been heavy marginalised but inactive talk in the debate, believe that in the full post-communist bloc liberal transformation and integration with the West was best done in Poland. Russian liberals mention to Poland as an example of a country that decently implemented liberal reforms and regret that the same failed in Russia, where after the fall of communism the regulation of oligarchs prevailed.
Also ruling from 1993 to 1998 Slovak Prime Minister Vaclav Mečiar was considered oligarch. Liberal European elites besides call the oligarch of the current Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico and the current Hungarian Prime Minister Victor Orbán. All these politicians are accused of illegally taking over EU funds and distributing them among their colleagues. The word "oligarcha" is clearly pejorative and European elites call almost exclusively right-wing and non-liberal politicians. However, it is worth noting that the real oligarch was besides undoubtedly the Liberal Prime Minister of the Republic of Montenegro Milo Dukanović ruling from 2003 to 2006. Indeed, in Montenegro, it was in Dukanović's time that EU funds were taken over and distributed between businessmen associated with the authority.
Transnational large capital
Demoliber and postmodern content spread all over the West thanks to the support of large capital. large corporations sponsor global organizations, online social networks and platforms spreading moral rot (Facebook, Netflix). all society that chooses to join the strategy and open itself to large capital falls to the moral bottom.
An example of this phenomenon may be Canadian Quebec. Quebec is simply a French-speaking state of Canada. Prior to planet War II, unlike the English-speaking part of Canada, Quebec was a Catholic state and powerfully conservative. From 1936 to 1939 and 1944 to 1949, Maurice Le Noblet Duplessis premiered there. During his reign Quebec was the most Catholic and conservative land in the full Western planet (not counting Frankist Spain). Agriculture was organized in a model, even feudal. large areaers took care of little wealthy peasants. The household had a peculiarly strong position. advanced fertility (some families had even respective children) was noted.
However, Duplessis made the mistake that he relied solely on Catholic conservatism prevailing in the state and did not pay attention to large cities specified as the capital of Montreal. In order to guarantee economical development, he allowed the capital to make large capital from the Anglo-Saxon part of Canada and the liberal activities of Anglo-Saxon media.
Children from multi-children families from the state began to go to college in Montreal, where they soaked in demoliberism. In the end, demoliberism reigned throughout Quebec. Until the strategy had led to the disappearance of the revolutionary left at Montreal University, Maoism had a strong position.
Today, there is nothing left of the old spiritual and multi - kid families. Today, French-speaking Quebec is Canada's most left-wing province. There are strong LGBT movements and feminism. The people of Quebec look at their past with shame and measure the times of Duplessis as a “dark garden”.
Another example of a conservative society being infected with demoliberalism is postwar Germany. After 1945, the Christian politician Union (CDU) took over power in Germany. At that time, it was a group referring to average Christian conservatism. In the time of the first postwar Chancellor Konrad Adenauer and his successor Ludwig Ekhard, German society was the most conservative society in Western Europe.
At the same time, the CDU did not put a barrier to transnational corporations and demolized Anglo-Saxon media, it allowed to spread leftist views at universities (trockism, maoism). The society began to become more and more deliberal.
Finally, the young generation of Germans raised after the war decided to overthrow the conservative order. The 1969 election was won by the left-wing Social Democratic organization of Germany (Sozial Democratische Partei Deutschlands, SPD), which ruled for the next thirteen years. It was only in 1982 that the CDU returned to power. Helmut Kohl, who held this office until 1998, became Chancellor. At the time, however, they were completely different Germans. There's nothing worth defending from erstwhile conservatism.
Currently, Law and Justice (PiS) in Poland follows the same way as the postwar CDU. He is besides a conservative-Christian organization and besides during his regulation he did nothing to halt the spread of moral degeneration on online platforms (Netflix). This led to the fall of moral society and the emergence of rainbow liberals and left.
Pro-Western Intelligence
The second origin that decided to join Poland was the activity of liberal intelligence. The real intelligent is not only a man educated and read (intellectualist) but, above all, individual who has a sense of mission to advance progressive, liberal and humanistic values. Therefore, actual intelligence must be a progressive leftist.
Bohdan Cywiński in his “Birthless Families”[4] He described the 19th century Polish intelligence operating under the conditions of partitions, whose mission was to fight Tsar's absolutism, to bring to the people democracy, humanism and progress. The same mission was carried out by revolutionary intelligence in Tsarist Russia.
Cywiński includes among others the intelligentness of the creators of the Endek movement (Jan Tomasz Jeż, Zygmunt Balicki, Jan Ludwik Popławski and Roman Dmowski). erstwhile acting under the command of specified intelligences, they set themselves the goal of raising awareness of the people, building democracy and national awareness, which was to reconstruct independence.[5]. A akin mission was carried out by the anti-communist intelligence of the period of the Polish People's Republic associated with the Committee for the Defence of Workers (KOR) and "Solidarity".
W Azerbaijan intelligence is associated in the Musavat Party, which seeks to advance western liberal values in conventional Muslim society. Kemalists played a akin function in Turkey.
Because the intent of intelligence is to advance liberalism, it occurs only where there is no liberal society yet. In liberal Western countries (e.g. France, Britain, etc.) there was never real intelligence. Intelligence with a mission occurs only in east countries aspiring to be the West (Poland, Russia, Turkey, Central Asian countries, African countries).
The long-time editor of the weekly “Wprost” Marek Król wrote in this letter that after Poland joined the European Union (EU) there would be an end to liberal intelligence. The mission that guided the intelligent will be accomplished, so intelligence can go away.
Rafał Ziemkiewicz was of akin opinion. He argued that solidarity intelligence leads Poland to the demoliberal West and will no longer be needed erstwhile we are full Western. It will then be replaced by a generation of brainless technocrats, bankers and economists.
These predictions came true. The Union of Freedom (UW) was a typical intelligent group in Poland. It aimed to advance liberalism and integration with the EU. It dissolved shortly after Poland joined the European Union. She was replaced by a non-ideical technocratic Civic Platform (PO) based on bankers and businessmen.
Currently there are no longer politicians with a mission and vocation in Poland, specified as Bronisław Geremek or Tadeusz Mazowiecki. In politics, media, and academic environments, it is dominated by professionals, people who chose a given profession to gain money and influence.
Medium class
The social layer through which the strategy was able to take root is the mediate class, the most degenerate part of society. It is crucial to emphasize that the modern mediate class is no longer understood classically (such as Aristotle's) as having its own medium-sized assets. In modern demoliberal societies, human position determines not so much the size of property as the amount of consumption. Modern mediate class are those who consume little than rich but more than poor. They are usually people doing slave work in large transnational corporations. They constitute an office “proletariat in white collars” entirely dependent on large capital.
Traditional society was based mainly on peasants-managents working on their own land and able to make their own armed formations (cosiniers), which took part in all Polish national uprisings. On the another hand, the demoliberal society is mainly based on employees of large corporations, which are only tiny cogs in the large strategy machine.
On the another hand, the Antisystem is based mainly on those who do not want to be mediate class and abandon the large urban consumption lifestyle. The most crucial thinker of integral traditionalism Julius Evola saw the right elements of anti-systemic rebellion even in subcultural movements of beatniks and hippies. Evola felt that beatniks and hippies were right in their criticism of consumer society. At the same time, he emphasized that their movement lacks a strong moral formation that would prevent him from falling into drug abuse and sexual promiscuism. The beatnik and hippy movement actually died out as a consequence of drugs and AIDS, causing their revolution to fail.
Today on Facebook, there are portals promoting the abandonment of large cities, life on their own soil, ecological food, strong household and sports lifestyle. The popularity of specified portals is simply a very affirmative phenomenon and anti-system environments should make in this direction.
Of course, the thought of returning to conventional life in the countryside is spreading mainly on the social networks controlled by the strategy besides gives emergence to the hazard that the strategy will commercialise this phenomenon, castrate it from all affirmative content and no Antisystem around it will arise.
Such an assumed by the strategy and a completely commercialized empty pseudo-Revolutionary symbol is now the image of Cuban revolutionary Ernesto Che Guevary. The real Che Guevara was far from the thought of a modern "caviar left" that made him an idol. He was just drunk on brutality and violence, he was a fanatical “homophobe”, a kind of truly male, opponent of effeminateness and womanizer. Now his image is simply a meaningless symbol appearing on the shirts of banana youth from large cities. There is simply a fear that Facebook posts calling for the abandonment of cities and surviving off their own hands will play a akin role.
However, any anti-system environments are not limited to promoting graphics on Facebook. any actually choose complete isolation from the strategy in real life. An example is the Dire Dogs group operating in Italy. It is simply a branch of the U.S. Wolfmen. "Werewolves" is an alt-right organization established in the United States, which has branches in respective European countries. In the United States, the “Wolfs” group was liquidated by peculiar services as being incompatible with the constitutional order, but its Italian branch survived and is inactive active. Members of this group began moving out of cities. They purchased land in the countryside, where they created a completely self-sufficient conventional community.
In addition to highly masculinistic anti-system groups promoting neo-Paganism in promoting conventional life on their own soil, Anti-system groups promoting conventional multi-children's household are besides active. An example of the Christian version of the Antisystem is the Facebook-based Trad West profile promoting a strong household and Christian values.
In addition to conventional familial streams, there is besides hedonist masculinism. It aims at combating the strategy and at enjoying all the pleasures it offers. This trend promotes sexual promulgation among men and the subject-matter attitude towards women, promotes bodybuilding as something that makes a man attractive and allows for the acquisition of women. This is mostly degenerated manhood. There is concern that this current of the Antisystem can be utilized by the strategy to direct male energy to false tracks. Therefore, household life should be valued higher.
Is there an alternate to the System?
For many years, the author believed that the strategy would fall erstwhile the global hegemony of the United States, the strongest demoliberic power, would come to an end. planet domination will then be divided between another non-liberal powers and evolution will take place from the single-polar to multi-polar world. Recently, however, he concluded that there was no indication that any change in the global power arrangement meant a crisis of U.S. hegemony would happen in the foreseeable future. no of the non-liberal powers can build alternatives to the System.
Russia, which can be considered (at least partially) as a non-liberal power that could be an alternate to the System, bleeds out in the war in Ukraine. The war aimed at restoring Russia's power position in the assumptions was to last from days to a week. In fact, it has continued continuously since 2022. In Ukraine there are dense positions. Russian forces have long not recorded any crucial successes in them, and on many sections of the front, even Ukrainian forces are subjected. There is no indication that the conflict in Ukraine would end with Russia's triumph in the close future.
On the another hand, the theocratic Iran, which is the strongest power of Central Asia, now resembles the russian Union in the Leonid Brezhnev era. On the 1 hand, it leads to a lively external expansion, on the another hand it is experiencing a deep interior crisis (in the time of Brezhnev there was a crucial decline in natural growth among the Slavic population of the USSR and a simultaneous demographic improvement of Muslim peoples of the Caucasus and Central Asia).
In East Asia, China is the strongest power. Today, however, their economical growth has slowed down rapidly. The long-term "one child" policy has besides hampered demographic dynamics. economical and demographic stagnation in China makes them incapable to compete effectively with the US on the planet stage.
India is now the fastest developing economically and demographically developing country in Asia. India is China's biggest competitor in the fight for hegemony over Asia. It should be noted that India is besides the largest demoliberal country in the planet in terms of population and is simply a geopolitical ally of the US, which means that it cannot be an alternate to the System.
The arabian planet is divided into respective competing centres. Moreover, most of these countries are liberalised and modernised in a Western way. The arabian planet now resembles Europe in the 19th century, where progressive liberal elites effort to introduce liberal values in conventional society.
Thus, according to the author, there is no anticipation of combating the strategy at global level. The construction of Antistem is only possible at the level of the tiny groups mentioned earlier. Anti-systemists should quit their lives in cities, buy land in the countryside, grow this land, make their own cataracts and advance male virtues.
In the present situation, it is besides impossible to overthrow the strategy in the way of the folk revolution. Poland does not have its own manufacture or economical independence. We are a country completely addicted to the West. In the event of a abrupt return against the Western institutions and the withdrawal of capital, the country would likely be in a deep economical crisis.
The second reason is that a large number of Poles work in the West to guarantee their families are alive. In many families, the only income is the work of a father-feeder abroad. specified people will not go out on the street in protest against the West, due to the fact that leaving Western structures means losing their only chance to earn.
Social groups that could emergence against liberal elites and trigger an anti-system revolution, specified as Polish farmers, were completely broken up by the strategy or cooped into it.
Even in 2000, charismatic Andrzej Lepper could drag peasants along with him and endanger the elite with the “March on Warsaw”. presently there is no longer a conventional peasantry in Poland, there are only large agricultural tycoons powered by grants from the EU and fur farms. Their sole nonsubjective is to request greater grants from the EU. They will surely not support the revolution of the Antisystem and Poland's exit from the EU.
The most revolutionary component was besides historically the layers excluded by the strategy and pushed to its margin. presently there are mostly no specified groups. The poorest are totally dependent on state social assistance or do low-paid work in, for example, Western hypermarkets. mediocre layers receive small from the System, but they will not go out to protest due to the fact that they are afraid to lose even what they have.
Entering mainstream politics, the Confederate announced the overthrow of the existing political class based on youth formed by the March of independency and tiny entrepreneurs. These 2 groups were the main electorate of the Confederation in the first period. According to the author, these are besides not revolutionary and anti-systemic groups.
Youth (especially in large cities) has a typically pragmatic attitude towards life. Most after graduation or college simply want to find a good occupation and are not curious in any revolution. In addition, young people are a group whose view is not yet shaped and always follow current trends. First, the event shaping the views of Polish youth was the March of Independence, now the Women's Strikes.
On the another hand, tiny entrepreneurs in Poland are, most often, people who made their own money in the first phase of capitalism (the alleged “Business Januszes”). They don't usually have a peculiar worldview. They're only curious in the company's business. "Business Johns" usually don't want a revolution due to the fact that it could harm their business.
Moreover, there is no developed culture of entrepreneurship in Poland. In France or Italy tiny businesses (e.g. shops, bakeries, etc.) have a long tradition. They belong to 1 household and are passed from generation to generation.
On the another hand, the Polish “Januszes of Business” who gained from zero in the late 1980s and 1990s erstwhile the boundaries with the West were opened usually think of their company in terms of immediate interest and do not look to the future beyond 1 generation.
Catholic traditionalist Fr Henri Delassus (also recognized as an anti-Semitic publicist) in his book "The household Spirit at Home, Society, and State" delighted to present the planet of French fine bourgeoisie. He wrote that all enterprise has its own tradition. Fathers teach their sons the art of doing business and make certain it lasts for generations[6].
The business culture described by Fr Delassis is only possible in countries with their own traditions of economical independence. The countries of Central Europe, specified as Poland, are the easternmost periphery of Western Europe. We mention to ourselves as the alleged “younger Europe”[7] or periphery, which only aspires to be Europe in the right sense.
We don't even have any historically established independency traditions. Even if in Poland there are projects e.g. between the sea or Latin civilization, their authors admit that they can only be implemented on the basis of the West.
Is the populist right antisystem?
Today, various types of right- populist movements are becoming increasingly crucial throughout the Western world. This trend includes, among others, supporters of Donald Trump in the United States, National Assembly (National Assembly) Marinne Le Pen in France, AfD in Germany, Law and Justice and Confederation in Poland.
Often these movements are mistakenly referred to as “antisystemic”. In fact, there are any elements of opposition to liberalism in these cases, but generalisation and clear qualifications must be avoided. any populist right-wing organizations have more anti-system elements, others have less, and any do not have them at all. Therefore, each organisation of this stream should be characterised separately.
The most crucial typical of the populist right is, no doubt, Donald Trump. By taking over the office of president of the United States, the global demoliberal empire, it will have the top impact on the System. Reaching power, he broke the liberal political correctness within the US. The fact that the demoliberal elites of the planet were so afraid of him and did anything to prevent him from winning the election may prove that he is actually able to destruct at least certain elements of the System.
The right- populist movements in the European Union are much more questionable. For example, the Italian Brothers (Fratelli d’Italia) organization leader current Italian Prime Minister Georgia Meloni is in no way a typical of the Antisystem. She's a part of a de-liberal policy. The melons analysed only social sentiments in a way convenient for the strategy and directed them to false tracks.
Another example of the postfascist communities' co-optation to the strategy is the National Assembly (Rassemblement National) Marine Le Pen, France. In order to enter mainstream politics, it broke off with the extremist program of the National Front (Front National) proclaimed by her father Jean-Marie Le Pen, changed the party's name and made its transformation towards the demoliberic right. Even the late 2024 celebrated actor Alain Delon, who referred to himself as a Gaulist or opponent of the monarchist and nationalist right forming Vichy's government, admitted that he had voted for the National Unity.
The extremist right associated with the Vichy government was reborn in France after 1945. She made many attempts to enter politics and yet created in 1972. The National Front, headed by Jean-Marie Le Pen. In 2018, his daughter changed the party's name to the National Assembly to cut off from negative associations and adopted the program of the demoliberist right hand, which allowed even Gaulists specified as Delon to vote for it.
The biggest doubts on the populist right rise an alternate for Germany (Alternative für Deutschland, AfD). On the 1 hand, the AfD has indeed been trying to break up a demoliberal political cartel ruling Germany since 1945 (CDU-CSU, SPD, FPD, Greens), on the another hand, there are 2 lesbians in the leadership of the party. By allowing tolerance for sexual deviance, AfD breaks all the rules on which the Antisystem should be based.
AfD is simply a typical example of moral degeneration prevailing throughout the Germanic world. It concerns not only Germany but besides another countries. For example, the head of the populist right in the Netherlands Gert Wilders is openly gay. Since the 19th century, feminism has had a major influence on politics in Sweden. In the Germanic countries, even movements that preach right content and that can be a possible alternate to demoliberalism are profoundly degenerated.
In Poland, led by Jarosław Kaczyński Law and Justice (PiS) is simply a full organization of the System. The author described earlier that PiS was nominally referring to Catholic values and at the same time allowing the spread of moral rot from the West to follow the post-war German CDU and will most likely end up with the same bankruptcy as the current CDU.
On the another hand, led by Krzysztof Bosak, Dr Sławomir Mentzen and Przemysław Wipler, the Confederation is the most defunct and opportunistic group in Poland. It is simply a model example of the co-aptation of right-populist environments into the System.
Currently, the only (at least partially) anti-systemic Polish policy is the late held mandate of Euro MP Grzegorz Braun, presently a candidate for President. A part of the anti-system environment voted for the Confederacy not due to the fact that they liked its perfect program, but due to the fact that Grzegorz Braun worked there. The people who voted for Braun did not realize that he was only a private Euro MP in the Confederacy (formerly MP) and that his possible to influence the full group was very tiny or even none.
Mentzen, Bosak and Wipler tolerated Braun's activities until then only due to the fact that he caused the Confederacy to vote the most extremist voters.
According to the author, it is crucial to measure the affirmative expulsion of Grzegorz Braun from the Confederation. The environment of the Polish Crown from the Confederation should make its own independent movement far right. Braun is simply a politician with very extremist views and a talented talker who can convince those views. If he had decided to make his own group, he would surely have found any support in society.
The current Hungarian Prime Minister Victor Orbán is simply a affirmative example of the transition from the strategy to Antistem. On the scale of 1 tiny country, he built a non-liberal democracy that was a good alternate to demoliberism.
Initially, Orbán's party, Fidesz, was the right-wing organization acting on the principles set by the System, being the Hungarian equivalent of German chadecia. Orbán in his 2009 book “Home is One”[8] complained about the average and besides small conservative nature of the German CDU. Rather, it is identified with the strict Catholic and Conservative Christian-Soziale Union (CSU) operating in Bavaria and acting as a smaller CDU coalition within the CDU-CSU. A peculiar example for him was the head of CSU, the current Bavarian Chancellor Markus Söder being the most utmost wing of this Bavarian party.
Although CSU is the most utmost conservative organization in modern Germany, it nevertheless works in accordance with the demoliberal principles of political correctness. Orbán, who was modeling it, besides acted at that time within the framework designated for the right hand by political correctness.
The current leader of Fidesz Victor Orbán is the most prominent typical of non-liberal democracy. The Minister of abroad Affairs in his office Péter Szijártó opposes US politics at global forum and prohibits the Batory Foundation from operating in Hungary.
Another example of a policy that created non-liberal democracy starting from systemic positions is the current Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Initially, his Justice and improvement organization (Adalet ve Kalkinma Partisi, ACP) was 1 of many parties in the Turkish political system. At that time, an army was guarding the secular strategy of the state, eagerly guarding that no muslim politician would come to power. Turkey's last president referring to Islam was İhsan Sabri Cağlayangil overthrown by the army in 1980.
ACP Erdoğana was always a right-wing party, but initially acted in accordance with the secular nature of the state. presently Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is simply a leader unambiguously associated with Islam and the leading typical of non-liberal democracy. He says his mission is to advance Islam among the Turks. Examples of Orbán and Erdoğan show that non-liberal democracy is simply a possible alternate to the strategy in 1 country.
National Movement Raises Careers
The Confederation's National Movement (RN) created by Krzysztof Bosak on the basis of the All-Polish Youth (MW) deserves peculiar attention. It is simply a group that castrated national environments from all extremist content. Initially, people with sincere right-wing beliefs joined the MW and RN. However, the leadership with Bosak successfully turned them into opportunists, careersmen, and servants of the System. For example, all members of the current editorial board of “National Policy”, the authoritative writing of omnipolacs, besides began publishing graphics in memory of Marshal Philippe Pétain and promoting various fascist and authoritarian interwar regimes.
Such a young man full of extremist ideals in good religion is enrolled in the MW or RN. In training, the organization’s leadership continues: “There is no chance of a national revolution. Therefore, extremist views must be abandoned and acted in the reality that it is. We request to engage in ad hoc political activities, support Mentzen and Bosak. In the second circular “though all Duda” or Tusk will corrupt our children and the police will torment us. Before answering all question, 1 must cut off from extremist nationalism." This is how many young people were turned into career and opportunistic.
The RN members never specify their views as "nationalist", they simply say that they are "national" and claim that Roman Dmowski himself was cutting himself off from nationalism.
In fact, Dmowski avoided the definition of the notions of endection of the word "nationalism" and utilized the name "national ideology" due to the fact that he was against all particularisms and wanted to make something of his own alternatively of copying abroad patterns.
On the another hand, members of the RN and MW avoid nationalism due to the fact that it is simply a politically incorrect word and creates panic among the demoliberal elites.
A fewer years ago, the president of the Lublin territory of the All-Polish Youth published on his profile graphics in memory of Leon Degrelle, which unleashed a media storm. The central management of the MW alternatively of giving him support cut off from him and joined the hunt. Finally, the curious individual himself filed a lowly self-criticism akin to what repentant communists had filed on Stalinist trials and stepped down from office.
Can Israel be a non-liberal democracy?
Israel is simply a country consisting exclusively of visitors. In 1948 the waves of Jews from all over the planet were coming. Initially judaic visitors from different countries had nothing in common, they spoke different languages, had different past and different worldviews. Suddenly, Jews from all over the planet found themselves in 1 country and were to make 1 nation.
The most influential group in modern Israel are liberal Jews from Europe. They concentrate mainly in Tel Aviv's capital, taking over media and large business. It is mainly on them that the democratic state is based.
The second crucial group are Jews who, as a consequence of the Operation “Most”, went through Poland to Israel from the territory of the USSR. They took leadership positions in the army and peculiar services. russian Jews represent a kind of warrior, have Zionist views, vote for the Likud organization and are supporters of a forceful policy towards the Arabs. any of them even request that the borders of Israel be extended to Jordan. The most utmost Zionist circles talk of "great Israel" reaching all the way to Euphrates. In the present situation, these claims are without basis, but it is worth noting that specified voices appear among the judaic extremists.
All points to the fact that maintaining the war against Hamas in the Gaza Strip and Hezbollah in Lebanon in an average state of Zionist Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu tries to consolidate the full society around him. His political reforms are aimed at removing influence from liberal Jews.
The liberal opposition has the support of the richest layers of judaic society. On the another hand, the Zionist Likud of Netanyahu is voted mainly by the little earner voters. Likud presently has about 30% of Israel's support. That's all he needs to be the chief force in the Knest. If Netanjahu strengthens his position, he will establish an alliance with the orthodoxes and will lead to the marginalization of the liberal environments against the war in Israel a non-liberal democracy will be built.
It should be stressed that Israel cannot function alone. It persists mainly due to the fact that it is in the interests of the large powers. Israel must always have a power over it that will keep it safe. Even in the ancient age, the judaic state has always been a protectorate of any power or was divided. Periods during which it was an independent centre of strength were uncommon and continued briefly (e.g. King David's Age). For a long time, the protector of ancient Israel was the Kingdom of Persia.
Israel is now a protectorate of the United States due to the fact that it is profitable for it. In the mediate East US policy, Israel is to be the centre of halting Iran's expansion. That is why Washington demands that the arabian states themselves sign average relations agreements with Israel. The first specified agreement was signed by Egypt in 1979. In 1994, Jordan made an agreement with Israel. In 2020, on the initiative of Washington, the Abrahamic Agreements between the United arabian Emirates, Israel and Bahrain were signed.
Further support for Tel Aviv may, however, cease to be profitable for Washington. It is possible that Trump will follow Obama's doctrine and carry the burden of interest from the mediate East to East Asia. judaic elites are aware of this and are conducting a multi-vector policy by bringing revived contacts besides with the main rival US, China. Israel is presently beginning up to economical cooperation with China. Thanks to Chinese investments, the port in Jaffa was upgraded, among others.
The judaic state has a large pragmatism in abroad policy and can change its protectors depending on the situation. With the change of protectors, it besides changes its systemic and civilizational paradigms. Israel is now a demoliberal state due to the fact that specified a strategy requires an alliance with the United States. However, if there are far-reaching changes in the politics of the United States that will end the support of Israel, the judaic state will easy submit to another power and change the government from demoliberism to non-liberal democracy based on Semitic ethnicity.
It seems possible that Netanjahu will take an example from Orbán. Both these politicians support and inspire each other. The Government of Orbán is now the most pro-Israeli government in the European Union. Israeli services have successfully assassinated Hezbollah leaders in collaboration with Hungarian intelligence. The judaic environment is constantly active in Hungary's politics, and Europe's largest active synagogue is located in Budapest (the author visited this synagogue a year ago).
Israel was to be a liberal democracy from the very beginning and the foothold of Western civilization among healthy patriarchal arabian tribes. In Asia, a liberal and secular Turkey was a akin foothold of the West. Despite this, Erdoğan managed to introduce non-liberal democracy there. Israel may have a akin way under Netanjah.
It should be noted that demoliberism in Israel present is simply a local variant of the strategy adapted to the specificity of judaic culture. Compared to Western Europe or the United States, the deliberal nature of Israel seems questionable. On the 1 hand, Israel is based on national awareness and institutions of liberal parliamentaryism, which are not present in clan states specified as the United arabian Emirates or Saudi Arabia, and on the another hand, the judaic spiritual law plays a strong function there, which may be gross for the Western man raised in secular culture.
Authors of sociology textbooks, which the author utilized during studies, wrote that the characteristics of a given model can only be determined by comparing it with another models[9]. Compared to the soft opportunist Bosak Netanjah, he seems to be a typically male politician, even a model nationalist and militarist. In relation to Western Europe and the US, Israel, in which ethnicity plays a strong function and religion looks like non-liberal democracy. In contrast to conventional arabian communities from the Gaza Strip surviving in the javelin clans of parliament, the military service of women's LGBT parades in Israel is simply a typical example of degenerate demoliberalism.
Wartime system
In many places in the world, the strategy is at war. He feels threatened due to the fact that to last he must establish alliances with non-liberal environments and negate any of the liberal principles he creates.
For example, volunteer armed formations in Ukraine, which, fighting on the side of the System, usage utmost right-wing symbolism (swastikas, Celtic crosses, wolf hooks). If AfD activists were to appear in Germany decorated with swastikas and Celtic crosses, their group would be banned. Similarly, if any identity movement in Western Europe wanted to treat immigrants the way Ukrainian nationalists treat a Russian-speaking number would hazard full persecution. Ukrainian nationalists are allowed to preach utmost views and to usage extremist symbolism due to the fact that in the present situation they are needed by the System.
The strategy besides completely abandoned the thought of the regulation of law in 2007-2010 and liquidated its opponents in an out-of-law manner. The thought of a "state of law" became a slogan to which the strategy refers only verbally.
After the 2001 WTC bombing in the panic atmosphere of George W. Bush adopted the alleged Patriot Act. According to him, persons suspected of terrorism could have been held in Guantanamo without a conviction and subjected to torture.
The illegal operation of the strategy is besides visible in the countries of the "East flank of NATO". A large part of the Russian number in Latvia was deprived of citizenship. About a 1000 people were deported to Russia. They are mostly aged people who came to Latvia in russian times.
In Poland, anti-system activist Mateusz Piskorski was held in custody for over 3 years without a sentence. An investigator's arrest, whose average function is to prevent the suspect from interfering, has become a place where enemies of the strategy can't be proven guilty. The strategy took on a militant character and became a totalitarian system. This is no longer early liberalism from the 1990s, which gives everyone equal rights in political life.
Antisystem in Poland
In the current situation, the Antisystem in Poland has no chance of entering the planet of politics and creating an alternate to the ruling cartel of demoliberal parties. Theoretically, the Antisystem could usage an utmost right-wing electorate disappointed by the Confederate's opportunistic course. In anti-system environments there are ideas of establishing a fresh Conservative-Catholic organization standing “to the right” from the Confederation. It is to be headed by Stanisław Michalkiewicz, Grzegorz Braun and Janusz Korwin-Mikke.
All indications are that this would be a typical example of an utmost right combining conservative and Catholic content with libertarian content. Stanisław Michalkiewicz is simply a classical liberal, Janusz Korwin-Mikke is simply a libertarian and alt-rightist (pronounced alt-right views in Poland before alt-right appeared in the US), while Grzegorz Braun constantly intertwines Catholic and libertarian themes.
The author points out that he disagrees with many of the content preached by Michalkiewicz, Korwin and Braun. However, he would be inclined to support any group standing “to the law” from the Confederation. All 3 mentioned activists are well-known and expressive representatives of the far right in Poland, all are politically incorrect and all are of any value to the Antisystem.
Michalkiewicz is simply a respected Catholic-convegetative publicist, Korwin-Mikke continues to scare liberal elites with his statements about women and gays, while Braun is simply a well-known tracker and opponent of judaic lobby influences.
Even if the organization they founded was not full anti-systemic, it would surely be politically incorrect and would give a chance to break the monopoly of demoliberal parties in Polish politics.
James Ignaczak
[1] Ignaczak J., Global strategy and Antisystem conflict at the level of metapolitics, Consevatism.pl-portal conservative thought, https://conservativeism.pl/jakub-ignaczak-global-fight-system-and-antistemu-on-level-metapolitics/, date of access: 10-12-2024
[2] See ibid.
[3]See Cywiński B., Rodowody niekórnych, planet of Book, Warsaw 1996
[4] See ibid.
[5] See ibid., pp.335-414
[6] See Delassus H., household Spirit at Home, Society and State, Fr P. Skargi Christian Culture Association, Kraków 2005, pp.129-141
[7] See Kłoczowski J., Junior Europe. Sodium-East Europe in the ellipse of Christian mediate Ages, State Publishing Institute, Warsaw 1998
[8] Orbán V., Homeland is one, Fronda, Warsaw 2009
[9] See Stampka P., Sociology. Analysis of the Society, Wydawnictwo Znak, Kraków 2002
