The future of Poland and the Russian-Ukrainian war..

The planet we know is at a crossroads. In spite of Europe's dependence on its gas and oil, Putin's desire to rebuild the Russian empire has made mistakes that offer us opportunities. Putin went all the way and wanted besides much and besides fast. However, the Americans, taking precedence in stopping the emergence of China's power, could not neglect to announcement the German-Russian (and traditionally French) initiative to push them out of Europe in defence of which they intervened in the I and II centuries and the Cold War. At the same time, Putin, knowing the priorities of the US, approached China. Putin's authoritative statements show that he would like to regain influence and control over the erstwhile russian republics and erstwhile russian satellite states. In practice, this would mean the creation of a Russian buffer region which deprives a number of states of their right to independence. If Ukraine, which for us is simply a buffer state, falls then Poland will become a buffer state. It follows that stopping Russia is in our Polish interest.

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=

What another option do we have? Drept in a patient German tail to accomplish a task of German-Russian cooperation with Poland as a German monttown? Additionally, Poland, by the ecological madness controlled by Berlin's Brussels, is suppressed and strangled by the leftist ecological variations which devastate Polish culture, tradition and chance to last in its identity. all sane Pole knows that these castrates of Latin civilization should be left to their own suicidal misfortune...

Today, although Ukraine does not belong to NATO, we are observing the launch of a circumstantial Article 5 in any explanation of aid from members of the alliance. Putin's biggest strategical mistakes should be added to the provoked membership of Sweden and Finland in NATO, which will dramatically extend its boundaries with the alliance and bring the Baltic Sea to the rank of NATO-Vow Lake. They do not yet have full accession (Turkey) but their bilateral agreements with the US and England have already been signed. This fresh strategical situation drastically weakens the importance of the Kaliningrad circuit, which was to fall to Poland, but Churchill generously gave it to Stalin. In this arrangement Belarus remains bitter for Poland, but if the war does not end as Putin intended and it becomes a buffer state that protects Poland. Then we will be able to practically implement the inter-sea alliance task with American aid...

Currently, in Poland, the right-wing squad is ruled, the better part, which came “out” from the circular table. It is associated with the USA and Israel. PO is associated with Germans who sympathize with Moscow, which besides took over the “Stasi” agents' files. any communist agents were taken over by the US and are doing well in Poland. The left is associated with global globalists (type Soros, Davos, City of London). Of course, there are flows and mixed factions between these groups. In the United States today, Davos, Soros, is ruled by the faction, but the Pentagon is inactive strong, each of which has its goals. This squad associated with Biden supports the war in Ukraine. It seems that they have put Putin (the ambition to rebuild the empire) in order to halt his nose and besides halt the dangerous process for the US (but besides for Poland) of approaching Russia. Its nonsubjective would be to jointly manage the northern Eurazia and push the US out of Europe. Therefore, the Polish government is helping Ukraine so much to halt Russia and to see this alliance harmful to prevent it. The Polish government, fulfilling Washington's wishes, knows that these large expenses associated with the aid of the 1 willing to fight Russia Ukraine are more beneficial than its defeat and the failure of a large buffer state, even if we have and unfortunately will have reservations for the Ukrainians.

All concepts of the creation of a common state of Ucropolis do not stick to proverbial poop both due to the differences in civilization and immense corruption (similar to Russia) and straight Latin-American ownership structure in Ukraine. For the first time I heard about specified a task in 1980 in Łódź in Marchlewski's plants at a gathering with Michnik and Kuronia, who originate from the Polish Ukraine (KPZU) from the period II of Poland, seemingly this plan already has a mustache. Let us remember the immense influences of people like Soros and powerful oligarchs, if we do not want to be influenced by them, let us be on guard, due to the fact that akin leftist crap threatens us from Brussels too. It can be read that the large western corporations purchased about 17 million hectares of Ukrainian land. The question arises as to what is meant by the planned reconstruction of Ukraine after the eventual end of the war, or does it mean rebuilding the strength and wealth of the oligarchs?

Moreover, Poland is not a full sovereign state for the time being, it is simply a associate of NATO and the EU, whose members are subject to certain rules and restrictions. Poland should aid Ukraine, but thank God it is besides subject to restrictions in accordance with the NATO and EU statutes. Of course, present we do not know whether the Ukrainian-Russian war will lead to a fresh configuration of relations in Europe, or even to the exit of Poland from the Union. However, the astonishing submission of the Polish government to the dictatorship imposed on it by the Brussels Carat is worrying. The government is strong in rhetoric, and very weak in practice...

We have the memory of a common complicated past with Russia/Ukraine. Let us look at the terms “Cozak” and “Ukraine”. There are many references to the origins of the name “Kozak”, from a goat (agility, stubbornness), from the Chazars (a medieval people surviving between the Black Sea and Caspian Sea, who accepted Judaism in VIII/IX), meaning a watchman, a guardian, a convoy. In the Mongolian and Turkish-Tatar tradition around the 13th century, “the Cossack” meant an independent, free, junak man, but besides a adventurer or a steppe robber. “Ukraine” in the Republic of the 14th/XV century defined border countries and regions. In the 16th century, this name was utilized for areas located on the Dnieprem covering 3 provinces of the Republic: Kiev, Bracławskie and Chernihowskie. In time this name besides included Volyn and Podole displacing the word “Rus”.

It seems that the biggest mistake of the Republic of the Both Nations was the unfortunate Brest Union of 1596 which aimed to connect the Orthodox Church with the Latin Church in the Republic of the Both Nations. This not only united and turned against the Republic of Rusins, but besides Cossacks “no religion” made the defenders of Orthodoxy. The Cossacks were celebrated for their battles frequently supporting the wars of the Republic against both Russia and Turkey. Unfortunately, they besides showed a strong tendency to anarchy. Many times the Republic of Poland was in problem with Turkey going after Cossacks raiding and looting Turkish Black Sea coasts. Any settlements, truces in which the Republic of Poland committed to punish and control the Cossacks in the long run failed...

Despite the direction chosen for the formal inclusion of the Duchy of Rusi as the 3rd associate of the Republic (Hadzicka Union of 1658, eliminating the Russian-Cossavian Perejassan Agreement of 1654), the mutiny of black inspired by Russia stopped this process and for a long time. He besides ended the dreams (and opportunities) of Rusins about freedom and autonomy within the Republic. Both Russia and Turkey (the guardian of Orthodoxy in their empire) utilized Orthodox religion as a dynamite demolishing the anticipation of the Republic of the 3 Nations. Neither did the devastating Swedish flood, which the Cossacks openly supported, help. The Cossacks, having driven the Polish administration distant for respective years, achieved independence. However, over time, seeking tactical aid (the Tatars of the Crimean Khanate working with the Republic of Poland were complicated) against the Republic of Moscow (1654) the Perejasławska union, the hetman B. Chmielnicki and the lawyer of Tsar W. Buturlin) fell under the Russian shoe, becoming subject to the Tsar, which they inactive have a strong Orthodox hiccup...

Another chance for Ukrainians to interact with Poles came only in 1920 (Piłsudski-Petlura), but this effort did not end well for the torn between Bolshevik and white Russian Ukraine. Ataman Petlura, representing the east Kiev Ukrainian republic threatened by Bolshevik Russia, became active with Piłsudski, who was dreaming of a wreath, a sanitary cordon of countries associated with the Republic of Poland separating it from Russia. In a hard situation, Petlura agreed to join Poland the lands occupied by Poles in the fight against the Western Ukrainian People's Republic, which is why present he is not seen as the hero of Ukraine. Unfortunately, this alliance besides ended badly and Poles signed a truce with the Bolsheviks leaving their existing ally on the ice, for which later Piłsudski apologized to interned officers and soldiers of Petlura: “Lords, I am sorry, it was not meant to be so”...

War is always a conflict and a scuffle, it destroys the established order causing the suffering of average people and opens fresh opportunities for the victorious and surviving elites. In this case, it besides shows how diverse the attitude towards the Russian invasion of Ukraine is with the individual countries of the Union and NATO. Poland (or the Baltic countries) sees Putin's possible success as a direct threat to itself, as Paris or Berlin. Countries historically acquainted with Russian or russian imperialism present are forced to think about creating an alliance of countries straight threatened. NATO is seen as the strength of diplomatic force with Germany wanting to usage this crisis to build its Mitteleuropa, a European superstate that would cover Europe as a whole, destroying local patriotism and national identities. We cannot agree to this even if the consequence is to leave the leftist, corrupt, climate-crazy union. It is besides a “climate” and an chance to regain fuller sovereignty, especially erstwhile Poles see a progressive Brussels roller dangerous for our country and the nation of demands.

The nearest time will show whether we truly care about the behaviour inherited from our parents and grandparents POLSKI, whether we are already dunes without identity and how moths will go on the lop of global left-wing glowing beads...

Jacek K. Matysiak California, 2022/12/18