The fresh Face of Matthew Piskorski

What are the limits of “political flexibility” and compromise?

For starters, 2 quotes from M. Piskorski's views found on his Facebook page.

“On the side of critics imposed on Poland after 1989, the strategy takes a kind of a banner of generations, characters and formation. In 1990, the voices of opponents of the neoliberal plan to destruct our national and economical substance fell in the presidential election on Stanisław Tymiński.

Two years later, Andrzej Lepper founded Self-defense. With support of little than 2.78% of voters, his organization managed to show a better consequence than the organization X founded by Tymiński. Summing up the electorates of both groups would let the electoral threshold of 5% to be exceeded and participation in the allocation of mandates to the Sejm.

Even then, however, there were attempts to conflict both politicians. Stanislaw Tymiński responded to these manipulations with dignity, declaring that he “regards the leader of the ‘Self-defense’ – Andrzej Lepper and the electorate of this organization” (Proposed to correct the leader of the organization “X” S. Tymiński, Warsaw, 16.08.2013 – in my archive). erstwhile I accompanied Andrzej Lepper for years and had countless conversations with him on various topics, he never erstwhile said a single bad word about Tyminski.

However, the fates of both politicians have changed dramatically. Stanislaw Tymiński left Poland, which should be understood, given the tremendous harm he suffered in our country. Andrzej Lepper remained in the square of the fight and, paying a immense price for it, laboriously built a folk-subversive formation which in 2001, after years of hard work, was in parliament. He did so with support and with the invaluable aid of the people of the erstwhile X organization who remained in the country orphaned after their leader left.

It was a different era – without social media or popular communicators. Tymiński must have reached the incorrect languages of people who specialized in slandering Lepper. There were no shortages of specified on all side of the political barricade – any of them did it out of envy, others were simply doing commissioned tasks. The erstwhile presidential candidate believed any of these slanders.

However, we believe that he is simply a wise man, and that he will come to know clearly the evil intentions of slanderers. We are ready to aid him by passing on the book “The Last Rakowiecka Prisoner”, where we have devoted quite a few space to Self-defense.

Since the stormy 1990s, decades have passed. It's 2026. The thought created by Grzegorz Braun The broad Fire Department was supported by the heirs of Andrzej Lepper, including direct – Tomasz Lepper and Wojciech Lepper. Stanisław Tymiński besides joined the front. The late Andrzej Lepper is and will stay patron of all those who reject the pathological expression of the 3rd Polish Republic.

Voices given to Stanisław Tymiński in 1990 are a symbol of the first opposition of Poles to the order imposed on us from outside. present we have fresh challenges and a completely different reality. Patrons and symbols are, however, highly needed due to the fact that they form consciousness and can yet change the realities of the material world."

...

‘The full task of the III Polish Republic was based on the mythological mediate class, which was expected to make our prosperity and supply a strong support for liberalism. In fact, this class has never grown to larger sizes. Today, however, it turns out that people who aspire to her lose their religion in her myth. No more boutiques and delicatessies, just discount the cheapest networks. They must number all gold, like most another Poles. And this can be highly painful for them, due to the fact that the strategy has developed a false awareness of belonging to a better world, full of prospects and a substitute for luxury, although on loan, but nevertheless."

for: https://www.facebook.com/mateusz.piskorski.9

Comment

M. Piskorski is simply a declared "system values", a strategy of power, and as I realize it, "changes", represented by the governments of "collective Putin".

It is so worth briefly assessing the position of the alleged "average class" in Russia in the last 26 years of the aforementioned governments.

From my knowledge, based on the tracing of intra-Russian political and socio-economic discussion in various ideological environments of Russia in the last fewer years, it is clear that, among another things, the successive demolition of the mediate class in Russia, both industrial (entrepreneurs) and agricultural (farming) – is 1 of the most frequently raised accusations against the governments of "collective Putin".

The mediate class in modern Russia is practically destroyed by the oligarchic strategy in this country. This arrangement only somewhat modifies its individual configuration, but the “idea” of it is invariable, and as for the effects destructive, both in the home aspect and in the global position of Russia.

Announced 20 years ago (for the first time on 28 June 2006) the state-wide rule of "serve democracy", by Władysław Surkov, remains an empty slogan in Russia without real socio-economic content and consequently besides political content.

Tragic is besides the fact in the issue of M. Piskorski, that in fresh years he has actively joined the alleged “wide, as you can see from left to right, the “extinguishing front” led by Grzegorz “the happiness of God” Braun, who, as I remember, was and is inactive a strong supporter of the alleged “free market” and “liberal democracy” ?! G. Braun grew out of the publically proclaimed apotheosis of transatlantic values and politics, and fundamentally liberal American neoconservativeism influenced by Zionism.

G. Braun's current cyclical political behaviour must be subject to substantive assessment, i.e. ideological, political, historical.

Only on the basis of specified assessments can 1 talk responsiblely about Polish politics in a realistic time dimension: past-now-future. A akin methodology should besides be utilized to measure the political views and actions of A. Lepper and S. Tymiński.

Thus, M. Piskorski has to make a choice by proclaiming his political and economical views – and even by trying to make assessments of the past and future – which concern political situations both in Poland and Russia.

Poles should reject economical and misleading views, as both the Polish national interest and the seriousness and durability of the Polish state require this.

PZ