The russian Union, in order to operate more effectively and to halt the improvement of the countries of Europe dominated by Moscow, created a subordinate organization called the Council of common economical Assistance. The abbreviation of this name, or RWPG, was read most correctly at the time as: "RWPG or Russian All Poland G...o".
Today's European Union, reclining into a nightmare increasingly ghastly, for decades having nothing to do with the thought of its fathers – the founders, on the scale of its booming pathologies, has long since pierced the former, with ground-gangrated RPPG. It is already this unfortunate Union to the same degree as the RPPG, the trampoline of imperialism and the instrument of efficient exploitation of the weaker by a cynical hegemon who cares only for his own interests. The russian Union was the hegemon in the RPPG, Germany in the European Union.
Let us note that everything in both Russian and German political phraseology, constructed for its own interest of ideology or historical narrative, is simply a cruel lie. The Germans called each of their expansions "the bringing of culture" (Kulturtraegeren). Russia – “gathering of Russian lands” (The kacapas found these “Rusian lands” even west of Kalisz) and then “internationalism”. The Germans called their genocides "medical procedures" (so the production of Zyklon B gas, gas chambers, crematoria, etc., was qualified in all papers of the 3rd Reich), Russia's drowning in the blood of independency occurrences to this day is inactive called "sedation". It is very crucial that we realize the appropriate meaning of the words utilized by forces that carry out lethal intentions for us. In the Bundestag and the European Union, for example, more and more are said to be "the work of Germany to take greater responsibility". This means that "Germany must have more power over another nations". It is besides very dangerous to fall for the beautiful word "federalization". According to the dictionary, it means an equal order of countries specified as the United States of North America, or a federation of 50 countries, each of which has a large degree of autonomy (e.g. the law established by these national or spiritual groups which the state has established) and each, regardless of its size, has the same number of representatives in the common state parliament. Nothing like this has always been said in the European Union. Although there is alleged EU law and Germany requires everyone to comply with it day by day, effectively enforcing the fines imposed on those who do not comply with it, they themselves stand on the ground of ‘the superiority of German law over the EU’. Because, despite the fact that (contrary to legends implanted in the ideas of reptiles) Germany itself was never a state of law, it was a doctrine that "Germany is simply a higher legal culture". Which means that EU law can be enforced from others. And not from Germany. For decades, this has had tremendous consequences. This allowed to co-finance and save all German shipyards at the same time, while all Polish shipyards were doomed. Force Poland to close its mines while building a full mass of German mines. Ban the sailing of Polish rivers while investing in the improvement of the navigability of German rivers. The same rule applies to everything and we have already experienced it by applying for admission to the European Union. In gathering the accession requirements, we have liquidated many businesses, even specified as sugar mills or dairy mills (where the Odra tycoons immediately entered). Due to “unprofitableness”, we were besides forced to destruct over 3600 kilometres of Polish railway lines. In Germany, not a kilometer was removed, even though not a kilometer from their line from time immemorial was never profitable, always required budget subsidies. However, Germany considers that "all German railway lines are strategical infrastructure requiring protection". Germans must not deprive any railway lines. And Poles take them distant slow and even request to.
The functioning of Germany above all law and their permanent practice of exploiting the weaker ones is possible through the servillistic attitude of France. It is hard to defy the impression that after a series of historical disasters which the Germans had caused to the French, they came to the conclusion that the best solution for them would be to occupy "position 2" in the Union. The French seemingly concluded that respective of their last generations had already accumulated adequate beating, after which they found the position of the “juniorpartner of Germany” satisfactory. In 1870 – 71 the Prussians drove through France like a fight, easy tore out the disputed provinces, humiliated Paris with parades of triumph and declared the decision to unite Germany straight from the Versaic office of the French kings. The First planet War theoretically brought France a victory, but – most strictly Pyrrus. It was not carried on German soil, the French land was destroyed, and then the German land was not able to enforce a percent of the compensation due. The awareness of the losses that Germany could make, in 1940, made French opposition appear weaker than the year of earlier opposition of Poland, which was then in a situation for a full hell of worse. In 1940, the French had adequate of a fewer weeks of German assault to make the French scold about the truce and control to Hitler. Since then, the skunk France has consistently seen its “big brother” in Germany. Taking care of the appearance of its power, improving the self-esteem of the production of slanders about alleged “Polish Holocaust co-workers” and giving advice, specified as “that we may take advantage of the chance of sitting quietly”, focuses on reaping the benefits of being “the first footstool of Germany”. For Poles, who for centuries have understood the thought contained in “Mr Tadeusz”: “What the French will come up with – then the Pole will like” this fact is painful. And even more painful for us are the effects of French same – degradation.
The French ‘strategy’ of agreeing to Germany's position as the main 1 draining the possible of another members of the Union, due to the fact that they agree that France should be the second 1 suctioning – it has increasingly worse effects for us. The staff of specified activities seems to have no end. Recently, arguing for this in the war in Ukraine, it was decided to allocate funds to all EU countries (largely out of their Giga-credit bills) for investments in the arms industry. Almost all of these investments will be concentrated in Germany and France. At the same time, the European Commission (in the form of which Poland has no influence, this determining body in the Union of everything is outside any real control and in no democratic way is elected) decided to de facto prevent the acquisition of arms from suppliers another than EU suppliers. Which can destruct all American or Korean investments in Polish industry. Will what we give to invest in the French or German arms manufacture bring us even more security? Absolutely not! Even if Germany and France increase the production of weapons – in the long term. During which it is very possible that our money is besides intended for purposes completely different. There is no adequate transparency (arms are secret things!) and very frequently it is hard to separate them from civilian investments (for there are many electronics, chemistry, vehicles, etc.). So I bet dollars against chestnuts that sooner or later it will turn out that the Russian-based threat (as it is known that Germany and France are at hazard most of all) of the "EU-wide" discharge on German and French arms factories will prove to be an thought to subsidize the only presently intoxicating economies of Germany and France.
And how not to callback the Polish People's Republic – this truth, according to which the RWPG is “Russia All Poland G...”. It is now the European Union that means "Germans (and a small bit of France) Everything." And Poland – even little than the proverbial “G...o”
Artur Adamski
